Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elastographic evaluation of mucinous carcinoma of the breast

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Elastography is widely used as a diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. However, no study has yet shown if elastography for diagnosing mucinous carcinoma is as useful as that for diagnosing the usual invasive carcinoma. Mucinous carcinoma is considered as a soft tumor. In this study, we used elastography to evaluate the elasticity of mucinous carcinoma.

Methods

Among 1,015 patients who underwent surgery for primary breast cancer between February 2007 and August 2008 in our facility, the final pathological diagnosis showed only 32 mucinous carcinomas. We evaluated 16 of the 32 mucinous carcinoma patients who underwent preoperative elastography.

Results

There were 13 cases of the pure-type and 3 cases of the mixed-type mucinous carcinoma. B-mode ultrasound (US) imaging showed mass formation in 16 patients. The elasticity score was 2 in 1 case (8%), 3 in 3 cases (23%), 4 in 7 cases (54%), and 5 in 2 cases (15%). The fat-to-lesion ratio (FLR) was evaluated in 7 cases. The mean value of the FLR was 12 (range 3–30).

Conclusion

Twelve of the 16 (75%) cases had an elastography score of 4 or 5. Although mucinous carcinoma had an elastography score similar to that of usual invasive carcinoma, elastography may be useful for distinguishing mucinous carcinoma from benign fibroadenoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ueno E, Umemoto T, Bando H, Tohno E, Waki K, Matsumura T. New quantitative method in breast elastography: fat-lesion ratio (FLR) (abstract). In: Proceedings of the Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Meeting. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America. 2007; 697.

  3. Nyugankenshinnihituyonabyorigakutekitishiki, Sakamoto G. J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen. 2001;10(2):153–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Regini E, Bagnera S, Tota D, Campanino P, Luparia A, Barisone F, et al. Role of sonoelastography in characterising breast nodules. Preliminary experience with 120 lesions. Radiology medicine. 2010;115(4):551–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaefer FKW, Heer I, Schaefer PJ, Mundhenke C, Osterholz S, Order BM et al. Breast ulotrasound elastography—results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(3):450–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tohno E, Ueno E. Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:200–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu QL, Jiang YX, Liu JB, Liu H, Sun Q, Dai Q, et al. Real-time ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of breast lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:1232–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, Mariani L, Marchesini M, Suman L, et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2381–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleury EF, Rinaldi JF, Piato S, Fleury JC, Roveda Junior D. Appearence of breast masses on sonoelastography with special focus on the diagnosis of fibroadenomas. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1337–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miki Mori.

About this article

Cite this article

Mori, M., Tsunoda, H., Kawauchi, N. et al. Elastographic evaluation of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer 19, 60–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-011-0268-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-011-0268-3

Keywords

Navigation