Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization approaches and climates investigations in NZEB—A review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Building Simulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conception of net zero energy buildings (NZEB) has been introduced to limit energy consumption and pollution emissions in buildings. Classification of NZEB is based on renewable energy (RE) supply options, energy measurement process, RE-sources location, and balances whether are energetic or exergetic. In general, it is traditionally agreed that there are three main steps to reach the NZEB performance, starting through the use of passive strategies, energy efficient technologies, and then RE generation systems. Then, these three steps could be accompanied with the smart integration of advanced efficient energy technologies. A state of the art shows that the main ZEB studies are related to: energy savings, reduce electric bills, energy independence, pollution reduction, and occupants comfort, in addition, others are more interested in the aesthetic aspect by combining modern technologies with innovations to achieve high energy and sustainability performance. Building optimization is a promising technique to evaluate NZEB design choices; it has been adopted to choose the perfect solution to reach the zero energy performance through the optimization of an objective function related to energy (thermal loads, RE generation, energy savings) and/or environment (CO2 emissions) and/or economy (life-cycle cost (LCC), net-present value (NPV), investment cost). This paper starts by presenting the global energetic and pollution challenges the world faces. Moreover, it shows, to the best to the author’s knowledge, the existing NZEB definitions and the corresponding case studies investigated in 8 different climatic zones (humid continental, humid subtropical, Mediterranean, moderate continental, moderate continental, marine west coast, tropical, semi-arid and hot), the paper also focus on the importance to treat each climate separately. Even in the same country, two or more climates may co-exist. NZEBs drawbacks are also presented. Furthermore, different optimization problems are reviewed in the last section. Building energy optimization methods are employed to obtain the ideal solution for specific objective functions which are either related to energy, and/or environment and/or economy. Optimization variables are distributed between passive and/or RE generation systems. Finally, a table summarizing the most commonly used electric and thermal RE applications which yield to the zero energy balance in each climate, as well as three flowcharts are presented to summarize the whole three-stage procedure, to reach NZEB, starting from building designing, passing through the optimization procedure, and lastly categorizing the zero energy balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AlAjmi A, Abou-Ziyan H, Ghoneim A (2016). Achieving annual and monthly net-zero energy of existing building in hot climate. Applied Energy, 165: 511–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida M, Bencresciuto A, Ferreira M, Rodrigues A (2015). Costeffective energy and carbon emission optimization in building renovation—A case-study in a low income neighbourhood. Energy Procedia, 78: 2403–2408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi E, da Silva MG, Antunes CH, Dias L (2012). A multi-objective optimization model for building retrofit strategies using TRNSYS simulations, GenOpt and MATLAB. Building and Environment, 56: 370–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione F, Bianco N, De Masi RF, De Stasio C, Mauro GM, Vanoli GP (2015). Multi-objective optimization of the renewable energy mix for a building. Applied Thermal Engineering, 101: 612–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione F, Bianco N, De Stasio C, Mauro GM, Vanoli GP (2016). Multi-stage and multi-objective optimization for energy retrofitting a developed hospital reference building: A new approach to assess cost-optimality. Applied Energy, 174: 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASHRAE (2008). ASHRAE vision 2020 Producing Net Zero Energy Buildings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

  • Athienitis A, O’Brien W (2015). Modeling, Design, and Optimization of Net-Zero Energy Buildings. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attia S, De Herde A, Gratia E, Hensen JLM (2013). Achieving informed decision-making for net zero energy buildings design using building performance simulation tools. Building Simulation, 6: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attia S, Carlucci S (2015). Impact of different thermal comfort models on zero energy residential buildings in hot climate. Energy and Buildings, 102: 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azari R, Garshasbi S, Amini P, Rashed-Ali H, Mohammadi Y (2016). Multi-objective optimization of building envelope design for life cycle environmental performance. Energy and Buildings, 126: 524–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglivo C, Congedo PM, Fazio A, Laforgia D (2014). Multi-objective optimization analysis for high efficiency external walls of zero energy buildings (ZEB) in the Mediterranean climate. Energy and Buildings, 84: 483–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambrook SM, Sproul AB, Jacob D (2011). Design optimisation for a low energy home in Sydney. Energy and Buildings, 43: 1702–1711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee R (2015). Importance of Net Zero Energy Building. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, 2(5): 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchgeo (2013). World Map of 360 International Known Net Zero Energy Buildings. Available at http://www.batchgeo.com/map/net-zero-energy-buildings. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.

  • Belleri A, Napolitano A (2012). Net ZEB Evaluation Tool—User Guide. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren B, Wall M, Flodberg K, Sandberg E (2012). Net ZEB office in Sweden—A case study, testing the Swedish Net ZEB definition. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 1: 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier MA, Ferron Y, Biaou A-L (2004). Simulation of zero net energy homes. In: Proceedings of ESim, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthou Y, Biwole PH, Achard P, Sallée H, Tantot-Neirac M, Jay F (2015). Full scale experimentation on a new translucent passive solar wall combining silica aerogels and phase change materials. Solar Energy, 115: 733–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichiou Y, Krarti M (2011). Optimization of envelope and HVAC systems selection for residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 43: 3373–3382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biwole PH, Achard P (2014). Thermal behavior of a passive solar wall with silica aerogel and phase change materials. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Energy Forum on Advanced Building Skins, Bressanone, Italy, pp. 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojic M, Nikolic N, Nikolic D, Skerlic J, Miletic I (2011). Toward a positive-net-energy residential building in Serbian conditions. Applied Energy, 88: 2407–2419.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPIE (2015). Nearly Zero Energy Buildings Definitions Across Europe.

  • Brinks P, Kornadt O, Oly R (2016). Development of concepts for cost-optimal nearly zero-energy buildings for the industrial steel building sector. Applied Energy, 173: 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle N, Van Geet OV, Pless S (2009). Definition of a “Zero Net Energy” Community. Golden, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlucci S, Cattarin G, Causone F, Pagliano L (2015). Multi-objective optimization of a nearly zero-energy building based on thermal and visual discomfort minimization using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Energy and Buildings, 104: 378–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpino C, Mora D, Arcuri N, De Simone M (2017). Behavioral variables and occupancy patterns in the design and modeling of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings. Building Simulation, 10: 875–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrilho da Graça G, Augusto A, Lerer MM (2012). Solar powered net zero energy houses for southern Europe: Feasibility study. Solar Energy, 86: 634–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causone F, Carlucci S, Pagliano L, Pietrobon M (2014). A zero energy concept building for the Mediterranean climate. Energy Procedia, 62: 280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellura M, Guarino F, Longo S, Mistretta M (2014). Energy life-cycle approach in Net zero energy buildings balance: Operation and embodied energy of an Italian case study. Energy and Buildings, 72: 371–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellura M, Guarino F, Longo S, Mistretta M (2015). Different energy balances for the redesign of nearly net zero energy buildings: An Italian case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45: 100–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho J, Kim J, Lee S, Koo J (2016). A bi-directional systematic design approach to energy optimization for energy-efficient buildings. Energy and Buildings, 120: 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary R, Augenbroe G, Gentry R, Hu H (2008). Simulationenhanced prototyping of an experimental solar house. Building Simulation, 1: 336–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua K, Yang W, Wong T, Ho C (2012). Integrating renewable energy technologies to support building trigeneratione—A multi-criteria analysis. Renewable Energy, 41: 358–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congedo PM, Baglivo C, D’Agostino D, Zacà I (2015). Cost-optimal design for nearly zero energy office buildings located in warm climates. Energy, 91: 967–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagdougui H, Minciardi R, Ouammi A, Robba M, Sacile R (2012). Modeling and optimization of a hybrid system for the energy supply of a “Green” building. Energy Conversion and Management, 64: 351–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dall’O’ G, Bruni E, Sarto L (2013). An Italian pilot project for zero energy buildings: Towards a quality-driven approach. Renewable Energy, 50: 840–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgarm N, Sajadi B, Kowsary F, Delgarm S (2016). Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: A simulationbased approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO). Applied Energy, 170: 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng S, Dalibard A, Martin M, Dai YJ, Eicker U, Wang RZ (2011). Energy supply concepts for zero energy residential buildings in humid and dry climate. Energy Conversion and Management, 52: 2455–2460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng S, Wang RZ, Dai YJ (2014). How to evaluate performance of net zero energy building—A literature research. Energy, 71: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doust N, Masera G, Frontini F, Imperadori M (2012). Cost optimization of a nearly net zero energy building: A case study. In: Proceedings the 4th International Conference on Advances in System Simulation (SIMUL 2012), Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussault J-M, Sourbron M, Gosselin L (2016). Reduced energy consumption and enhanced comfort with smart windows: Comparison between quasi-optimal, predictive and rule-based control strategies. Energy and Buildings, 127: 680–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eley C, Goodrich K, Arent J, Higa R, Rauss D (2011). Rethinking percent savings–The problem with percent savings and zEPI: The new scale for a net zero energy future. ASHRAE Transactions, 117(2): 787–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshraghi J, Narjabadifam N, Mirkhani N, Sadoughi Khosroshahi S, Ashjaee M (2014). A comprehensive feasibility study of applying solar energy to design a zero energy building for a typical home in Tehran. Energy and Buildings, 72: 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2010). The Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings. Official Journal of the European Union.

  • Fabrizio E, Filippi M, Virgone J (2009). An hourly modelling framework for the assessment of energy sources exploitation and energy converters selection and sizing in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 41: 1037–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrizio E, Corrado V, Filippi M (2010). A model to design and optimize multi-energy systems in buildings at the design concept stage. Renewable Energy, 35: 644–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanney AH, Payne V, Ullah T, Ng L, Boyd M, et al. (2015). Net-zero and beyond! Design and performance of NIST’s net-zero energy residential test facility. Energy and Buildings, 101: 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong KF, Lee CK (2012). Towards net zero energy design for low-rise residential buildings in subtropical Hong Kong. Applied Energy, 93: 686–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fux S, Benz M, Guzzella L (2013). Economic and environmental aspects of the component sizing for a stand-alone building energy system: A case study. Renewable Energy, 55: 438–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde F, David M, Lenoir A, Ottenwelter E (2011). Towards net zero energy buildings in hot climates: Part 1, New tools and methods. ASHRAE Transactions, 117(1): 450–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde F, Lenoir A, Scognamiglio A, Aelenei D, Waldren D, et al. (2013). How to design a net zero energy building? Solution sets and case studies: Experience and feedback of the IEA Task 40/Annex 52, High Energy Performance Buildings Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggins J, Moran P, Armstrong A, Hajdukiewicz M (2016). Lifecycle environmental and economic performance of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) in Ireland. Energy and Buildings, 116: 622–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goia F (2016). Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implications on total energy saving potential. Solar Energy, 132: 467–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good C, Andresen I, Hestnes AG (2015). Solar energy for net zero energy buildings—A comparison between solar thermal, PV and photovoltaic–thermal (PV/T) systems. Solar Energy, 122: 986–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good C, Kristjansdottír T, Houlihan Wiberg A, Georges L, Hestnes AG (2016). Influence of PV technology and system design on the emission balance of a net zero emission building concept. Solar Energy, 130: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Deal Energy Solution (2016). About Energy Performance Certificates. Available at http://www.greendealenergysolution.co.uk/about-energy-performance-certificates. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.

  • Hamdy M, Nguyen A-T, Hensen JLM (2016). A performance comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for solving nearly-zero-energy-building design problems. Energy and Buildings, 121: 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hani A, Koiv T-A (2012). Optimization of office building facades in a warm summer continental climate. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 3: 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkouss F, Fardoun F, Biwole PH (2016). Optimization of design parameters of a net zero energy home. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Renewable Energies for Developing Countries (REDEC), Lebanon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkouss F, Fardoun F, Biwole PH (2018). Multi-objective optimization methodology for net zero energy buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 16: 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassoun A, Dincer I (2014). Development of power system designs for a net zero energy house. Energy and Buildings, 73: 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirvonen J, Kayo G, Hasan A, Sirén K (2016). Zero energy level and economic potential of small-scale building-integrated PV with different heating systems in Nordic conditions. Applied Energy, 167: 255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan Wiberg A, Georges L, Dokka TH, Haase M, Time B, Lien AG, Mellegård S, Maltha M (2014). A net zero emission concept analysis of a single-family house. Energy and Buildings, 74: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra LMC, Feldheim V, Dumont E, Pierret S, Deramaix D (2014). Building energy and light simulations for the design of passiveapartment buildings in Belgium. In: Proceedings of Building Simulation and Optimization Conference (BSO14), London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Biwole PH, Wurtz E, Achard P (2014a). A study on the thermal performance of exterior walls covered with a recently patented silica-aerogel-based insulating coating. Building and Environment, 81: 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Wurtz E, Biwole PH, Achard P, Sallee H (2014b). Hygrothermal performance of exterior walls covered with aerogelbased insulating rendering. Energy and Buildings, 84: 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Biwole PH, Achard P, Wurtz E, Ansart G (2015). Building envelope with a new aerogel-based insulating rendering: Experimental and numerical study, cost analysis, and thickness optimization. Applied Energy, 159: 490–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2010). Towards Net Zero Energy Solar Buildings, IEA SHC/ECBCS Project Factsheet, Task 40 /Annex 52. Available at http://www.iea-shc.org/publications-tasks. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.

  • IEA (2013). Transition to Sustainable Buildings: Strategies and Opportunities to 2050. International Energy Agency.

  • IEA (2017). International Energy Agency Statistics.

  • Inoue T, Ichinose M (2016). Advanced technologies for appropriate control of heat and light at windows. Energy Procedia, 96: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal MT (2004). A feasibility study of a zero energy home in Newfoundland. Renewable Energy, 29: 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Rahimi-Eichi H (2009). Design, modeling and simulation of a green building energy system. In: Proceedings of IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. J.W.York

    Google Scholar 

  • Homes (2013). Building Green. Available at http://www.jwyorkhomes.com. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.

  • Kaziolas DN, Bekas GK, Zygomalas I, Stavroulakis GE (2015). Life cycle analysis and optimization of a timber building. Energy Procedia, 83: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilkis S (2007). A new metric for net-zero carbon buildings. In: Proceedings of the Energy Sustainability Conference (ES2007), pp. 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krarti M, Ihm P (2016). Evaluation of net-zero energy residential buildings in the MENA region. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22: 116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurnitski J (2013). Cost Optimal and Nearly Zero-Energy Buildings (nZEB). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laustsen J (2008). Energy Efficiency Requirements in Building Codes, Energy Efficiency Policies for New Buildings. International Energy Agency. pp. 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Lee D, Baek N, Kwon H, Lee C (2012). Preliminary determination of optimal size for renewable energy resources in buildings using RETScreen. Energy, 47: 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li DHW, Yang L, Lam JC (2013). Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications—A review. Energy, 54: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li HX, Gül M, Yu H, Al-Hussein M (2017). Automated energy simulation and analysis for NetZero Energy Home (NZEH) design. Building Simulation, 10: 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y-H, Tsai K-T, Lin M-D, Yang M-D (2016). Design optimization of office building envelope configurations for energy conservation. Applied Energy, 171: 336–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg KB, Fischer D, Doorman G, Korpås M, Sartori I (2016a). Cost-optimal energy system design in Zero Energy Buildings with resulting grid impact: A case study of a German multi-family house. Energy and Buildings, 127: 830–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg KB, Doorman G, Fischer D, Korpås M, Ånestad A, Sartori I (2016b). Methodology for optimal energy system design of Zero Energy Buildings using mixed-integer linear programming. Energy and Buildings, 127: 194–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Meng X, Tam C (2015a). Building information modeling based building design optimization for sustainability. Energy and Buildings, 105: 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Zhang L, Gong G, Li H, Tang G (2015b). Review of solar thermoelectric cooling technologies for use in zero energy buildings. Energy and Buildings, 102: 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes RA, Martins J, Aelenei D, Lima CP (2016). A cooperative net zero energy community to improve load matching. Renewable Energy, 93: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Wang S, Shan K (2015a). Design optimization and optimal control of grid-connected and standalone nearly/net zero energy buildings. Applied Energy, 155: 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Wang S, Zhao Y, Yan C (2015b). Renewable energy system optimization of low/zero energy buildings using single-objective and multi-objective optimization methods. Energy and Buildings, 89: 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P (2009). A Literature Review of Zero Energy Buildings (ZEB) Definitions. DCE Technical Reports; No. 78, Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P (2011). Zero Energy Building definition—A literature review. A technical report of subtask A, International Energy Agency, Joint Project-Task 40/Annex 52 Net Zero Energy Buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P, Bourrelle J, Musall E, Voss K, Sartori I, Napolitano A (2011). Zero energy building—A review of definitions and calculation methodologies. Energy and Buildings, 434: 971–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin E, Parker D, Sherwin J, Colon C (2009). Preliminary Performance Evaluation of a Near Zero Energy Home in Callaway, Florida. Florida Solar Energy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milan C, Bojesen C, Nielsen MP (2012). A cost optimization model for 100% renewable residential energy supply systems. Energy, 48: 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBI (2015). NBI new building institute, ZEPI. Available at http://newbuildings.org/code_policy/zepi. Accessed 5 Nov 2017.

  • Ndiaye D (2018). The impact of building massing on net-zero achievability for office buildings. Building Simulation, 11: 435–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri MM, Gohari M, Abd. Majid MZ (2015). A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43: 843–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen A-T, Reiter S, Rigo P (2014). A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis. Applied Energy, 113: 1043–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi M, Athienitis A, Delisle V, Ayoub J, Berneche B (2008). Net zero energy homes of the future: A case study of the ÉcoTerraTM House in Canada. In: Proceedings of Renewable Energy Congress, Glasgow, UK, pp. 208–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton P, Christensen C, Hancock E, Barker G, Reeves P (2008). The NREL/habitat for humanity zero energy home: A cold climate case study for affordable zero energy homes. NREL/TP-550-43188. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira Panão MJN, Rebelo MP, Camelo SML (2013). How low should be the energy required by a nearly Zero-Energy Building? The load/generation energy balance of Mediterranean housing. Energy and Buildings, 61: 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ooka R, Komamura K (2009). Optimal design method for building energy systems using genetic algorithms. Building and Environment, 44: 1538–1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osseiran K (2015). Energy Security: The Lebanese Case. CEDRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikas E, Thalfeldt M, Kurnitski J (2014). Cost optimal and nearly zero energy building solutions for office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 74: 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless S, Torcellini P (2009). Getting to net zero. NREL/JA-550-46382. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless S, Torcellini P (2010). Net-zero energy buildings a classification system based on renewable energy supply options. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless S, Scheib J, Torcellini P, Hendron B, Slovensky M (2014). NASA Net Zero Energy Buildings Roadmap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad S, Reddy V, Saibabu C (2011). Integration of renewable energy sources in zero energy buildings with economical and environmental aspects by using HOMER. International Journal of Science and Ddvanced Technology, 9: 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • RESN (2014). Mortgage Industry National Home Energy Rating Systems Standards. Residential Energy Services Network.

  • RESNET (2016). What Is the HERS Index? Available at http://www.resnet.us/hers-index. Accessed 8 Dec 2017.

  • Rezaie B, Esmailzadeh E, Dincer I (2011). Renewable energy options for buildings: Case studies. Energy and Buildings, 43: 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Ubinas E, Montero C, Porteros M, Vega S, Navarro I, et al. (2014). Passive design strategies and performance of Net Energy Plus Houses. Energy and Buildings, 83: 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori I, Napolitano A, Voss K (2012). Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings, 48: 220–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh PH, Nor NBM, Nallagownden P, Elamvazuthi I (2018). Intelligent multi-objective optimization for building energy and comfort management. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 30: 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharafi M, ElMekkawy TY, Bibeau EL (2015). Optimal design of hybrid renewable energy systems in buildings with low to high renewable energy ratio. Renewable Energy, 83: 1026–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin J, Colon C, Parker D, Martin E (2010). Performance of four near zero energy homes: Lessons learned. In: Proceedings of the ASHRAE Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XI International Conference, pp. 5–9.

  • Shukla AK, Sudhakar K, Baredar P (2016a). A comprehensive review on design of building integrated photovoltaic system. Energy and Buildings, 128: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla AK, Sudhakar K, Baredar P (2016b). Exergetic analysis of building integrated semitransparent photovoltaic module in clear sky condition at Bhopal India. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 8: 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla AK, Sudhakar K, Baredar P (2016c). Exergetic assessment of BIPV module using parametric and photonic energy methods: A review. Energy and Buildings, 119: 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotehi O, Chaker A, Maalouf C (2016). Hybrid PV/T water solar collector for net zero energy building and fresh water production: A theoretical approach. Desalination, 385: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souayfane F, Fardoun F, Biwole P-H (2016). Phase change materials (PCM) for cooling applications in buildings: A review. Energy and Buildings, 129: 396–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler P, Ashouri A, Maréchal F (2016). Model-based optimization of distributed and renewable energy systems in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 120: 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Huang P, Huang G (2015). A multi-criteria system design optimization for net zero energy buildings under uncertainties. Energy and Buildings, 97: 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalay Z, Zöld A (2014). Definition of nearly zero-energy building requirements based on a large building sample. Energy Policy, 74: 510–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalfeldt M, Pikas E, Kurnitski J, Voll H (2013). Facade design principles for nearly zero energy buildings in a cold climate. Energy and Buildings, 67: 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson S, Duggirala B (2009). The feasibility of renewable energies at an off-grid community in Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13: 2740–2745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torcellini P, Pless S, Deru M, Crawley D (2006). Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis G, Martinopoulos G (2015). Solar energy systems potential for nearly net zero energy residential buildings. Solar Energy, 115: 743–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsikaloudaki K, Laskos K, Theodosiou T, Bikas D (2012). Assessing cooling energy performance of windows for office buildings in the Mediterranean zone. Energy and Buildings, 49: 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuhus-Dubrow D, Krarti M (2010). Genetic-algorithm based approach to optimize building envelope design for residential buildings. Building and Environment, 45: 1574–1581.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2015). UN projects world population to reach 8.5 billion by 2030, driven by growth in developing countries. Available at http://www.un.org. Accessed 8 Nov 2017.

  • U.S. DOE (2007). Building Technologies Program, Planned Program Activities for 2008–2012.

  • Voss K (2012). Nearly-zero, Net zero and Plus Energy Buildings. REHVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Gwilliam J, Jones P (2009). Case study of zero energy house design in UK. Energy and Buildings, 41: 1215–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J, Mitchell R, Raicic V, Vellei M, Mustard G, et al. (2016). Less is more: A review of low energy standards and the urgent need for an international universal zero energy standard. Journal of Building Engineering, 6: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M-D, Lin M-D, Lin Y-H, Tsai K-T (2017). Multiobjective optimization design of green building envelope material using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Applied Thermal Engineering, 111: 1255–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler W, Boxem G (2013). Net-zero energy building schools. Renewable Energy, 49: 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhang L, Wang Y (2016a). Shape optimization of free-form buildings based on solar radiation gain and space efficiency using a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the severe cold zones of China. Solar Energy, 132: 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Huang P, Sun Y (2016b). A multi-criterion renewable energy system design optimization for net zero energy buildings under uncertainties. Energy, 94: 654–665.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Lebanese University as well as the association of specialization and scientific orientation for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Institute of Technology, Department GIM, Lebanese University, Saida, Lebanon

    Fatima Harkouss & Farouk Fardoun

  2. J.A. Dieudonné Laboratory, UMR CNRS 7351, Parc Valrose, Université Cote d’Azur, 06108, Nice, France

    Fatima Harkouss & Pascal Henry Biwole

  3. PERSEE—Center for Processes, Renewable Energies and Energy Systems, CS 10207, MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, 06 904, Sophia Antipolis, France

    Pascal Henry Biwole

Authors
  1. Fatima Harkouss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farouk Fardoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pascal Henry Biwole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farouk Fardoun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harkouss, F., Fardoun, F. & Biwole, P.H. Optimization approaches and climates investigations in NZEB—A review. Build. Simul. 11, 923–952 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0448-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-018-0448-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation