Skip to main content
Log in

Pancreaticogastrostomy After Whipple’s Surgery Avoids Pancreatic Fistula—a Large Case Series Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various modifications of the reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) have been described. Pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) was first described clinically by Waugh and Clagett from the Mayo Clinic in 1946. Despite recent randomized trials and meta-analysis, the literature is still ambiguous as to which is a safer procedure. We hereby describe our experience of more than 400 pancreaticogastrostomies. The legacy of performing only pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) started by the senior author (BMLK) continued from 1977 to date in this surgical unit of a tertiary care hospital. We present the results of this case series analysis of a total of 467 Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy in whom PG was performed. The mean operative time was 260.8 ± 50.3 min (180–390 min) with an average blood loss of 1068 ± 606.19 ml (400–2600 ml). None of the patients had clinically significant POPF. Thirty-five patients had postoperative bleeding out of which 12 were early and 23 had delayed hemorrhage. The most common postoperative complication was delayed gastric emptying which was seen in 96 patients (20.5%). Transient bile leak was seen in 84 patients (18%). Wound infection was seen in 70 (15%) patients. The overall 30-day mortality was 2% (10 out of 400). PG as a reconstructive technique is a safe option following PD with minimal incidence of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) as shown in our series of more than 400 patients. This is the largest series to date of pancreaticogastrostomy following PD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krishna A et al (2015) Preventing delayed gastric emptying after Whipple’s procedure—isolated roux loop reconstruction with pancreaticogastrostomy. Indian J Surg 77(2):703–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102(4):763–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiong JJ et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101.10:1196–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang TB, Bai XL, Zheng SS (2007) Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: diagnosed according to International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition. Pancreatology 7:325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapur BML, Misra MC, Seenu V, Goel AK (1998) Pancreaticogastrostomy for reconstruction of pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma. Am J Surg 176(3):274–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Waugh JM, Clagett OT (1946) Resection of the duodenum and head of the pancreas for carcinoma; an analysis of thirty cases. Surgery 20:224–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S, Fourtanier G, Muscari F, Hay JM, French Associations for Research in Surgery et al (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Müller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Büchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu WM, Li A, Ke NW, Liu XB (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 99:1050–1061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, Klein F, Sick O, Niedergethmann M, Wilhelm TJ, Farkas SA, Börner T, Bruns C, Kleespies A (2016) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 263(3):440–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M, Adam U, Hopt UT, Keck T (2012) Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1686–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Takao S et al (1993) Modified pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 165(3):317–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery et al (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 14:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P, Muñoz-Forner E, Lopez-Ben S, Falgueras L, Sala-Palau C, Albiol M, Ortega-Serrano J, Castro-Gutierrez E (2013) Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 100:1597–1605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asuri Krishna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishna, A., Bansal, V.K., Kumar, S. et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy After Whipple’s Surgery Avoids Pancreatic Fistula—a Large Case Series Analysis. Indian J Surg 82, 415–420 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01991-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01991-4

Keywords

Navigation