Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Collective Review on Mesh-Based Repair of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In accordance with the tension-free principles for other hernias, umbilical and epigastric hernia repair should probably be mesh-based. The number of randomized studies is increasing, most of them showing significantly less recurrences with the use of a mesh. Different devices are available and are applicable by several approaches. The objective of this review was to evaluate recent literature for the different types of mesh for umbilical and epigastric hernia repair and recurrences after mesh repair. A multi-database search was conducted to reveal relevant studies since 2001 reporting mesh-based repair of primary umbilical/epigastric hernia and their outcomes in adult patients. A total of 20 studies were included, 15 of them solely involved umbilical hernias, whereas the remaining studies included epigastric hernias as well. A median of 124 patients (range, 17–384) was investigated per study. Three quarters of the included studies had a follow-up of at least 2 years. Six studies described the results of laparoscopic approach, of which one reported a recurrence rate of 2.7 %; in the remaining studies, no recurrences occurred. Two comparative studies reported a lower incidence of complications and postoperative pain after laparoscopic repair compared to open repair. Seventeen studies reported results of open techniques, of which seven studies showed no recurrence. Other studies reported recurrence rates up to 3.1 %. A wide range of complication rates were reported (0–33 %). This collective review showed acceptable recurrence rates for mesh-based umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. A wide range of devices was investigated. A tendency toward more complications after laparoscopic repair was found compared to open repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Greenburg AG (eds) (2002) Nyhus and condon’s hernia, 5th edn. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devlin HB, Kingsnorth A (1998) Management of abdominal hernias, 2nd edn. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Musca AA (1967) Umbilical and ventral herniorrhaphy: a review of 1000 cases. I. Characteristics which predict surgical results and predisposing factors. Int Surg 48(2):169–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenthal RA (1994) Small-bowel disorders and abdominal wall hernia in the elderly patient. Surg Clin North Am 74(2):261–291 (Review)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muschaweck U (2003) Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1207–1221 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdel-Baki NA, Bessa SS, Abdel-Razek AH (2007) Comparison of prosthetic mesh repair and tissue repair in the emergency management of incarcerated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11(2):163–167 (Comparative study randomized controlled trial)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88(10):1321–1323 (Clinical trial comparative study randomized controlled trial)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Tekelioglu MH (2006) Which repair in umbilical hernia of adults: primary or mesh? Int Surg 91(5):258–261 (Clinical trial comparative study)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanjay P, Reid TD, Davies EL, Arumugam PJ, Woodward A (2005) Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia 9(3):248–251 (Comparative study)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stabilini C, Stella M, Frascio M, De Salvo L, Fornaro R, Larghero G et al (2009) Mesh versus direct suture for the repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Ten-year experience. Ann Ital Chir 80(3):183–187 (Comparative study)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14(5):455–462 (Meta-analysis review)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R (2007) Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. Am J Surg 194(3):394–400 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morris PJ, Malt R (1994) Oxford textbook of surgery. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM et al (2007) Sabiston textbook of surgery, 18th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ponten JE, Somers KY, Nienhuijs SW (2012) Pathogenesis of the epigastric hernia. Hernia 16(6):627–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Merlin T, Weston A, Tooher R (2009) Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian ‘levels of evidence’. BMC Med Res Methodol 9:34

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12 (Meta-analysis)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berrevoet F, D'Hont F, Rogiers X, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B (2011) Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3 cm diameter. Am J Surg 201(1):85–90 (Clinical trial comparative study)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G, Bilgin M, Erzurumlu K, Ozkan K (2005) Umbilical hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Am J Surg 190(1):61–64 (Clinical trial comparative study randomized controlled trial)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eriksen JR, Bisgaard T, Assaadzadeh S, Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J (2011) Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant versus titanium tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair. Br J Surg 98(11):1537–1545 (Comparative study multicenter study randomized controlled trial. Research support, non-U.S government)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kulacoglu H, Yazicioglu D, Ozyaylali I (2012) Prosthetic repair of umbilical hernias in adults with local anesthesia in a day-case setting: a comprehensive report from a specialized hernia center. Hernia 16(2):163–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arroyo Sebastian A, Perez F, Serrano P, Costa D, Oliver I, Ferrer R et al (2002) Is prosthetic umbilical hernia repair bound to replace primary herniorrhaphy in the adult patient? Hernia 6(4):175–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Farrow B, Awad S, Berger DH, Albo D, Lee L, Subramanian A et al (2008) More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center. Am J Surg 196(5):647–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL, Manjarrez A (2004) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: an 11-year experience. Hernia 8(1):23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez R, Mason E, Duncan T, Wilson R, Ramshaw BJ (2003) Laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair. JSLS 7(4):323–328 (Comparative study)

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF, Weidema WF (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia 9(4):334–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lau H, Patil NG (2003) Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc 17(12):2016–2020 (Comparative study. Research support, non-U.S government. Review)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wright BE, Beckerman J, Cohen M, Cumming JK, Rodriguez JL (2002) Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair? Am J Surg 184(6):505–508, discussion 8–9 (Comparative study)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Asolati M, Huerta S, Sarosi G, Harmon R, Bell C, Anthony T (2006) Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience. Am J Surg 192(5):627–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hilling DE, Koppert LB, Keijzer R, Stassen LP, Oei IH (2009) Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study. Surg Endosc 23(8):1740–1744 (Evaluation studies)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bencini L, Sanchez LJ, Bernini M, Miranda E, Farsi M, Boffi B et al (2009) Predictors of recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(2):128–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin DF, Williams RF, Mulrooney T, Voeller GR (2008) Ventralex mesh in umbilical/epigastric hernia repairs: clinical outcomes and complications. Hernia 12(4):379–383 (Comparative study)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dabic D, Cerovic S, Azanjac B, Maric B, Kostic I (2010) Prolene hernia system, ultrapro hernia system and 3D patch devices in the treatment of inguinal, femoral, umbilical and small incisional hernias in outpatient surgery. Acta Chir Iugosl 57(2):49–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vychnevskaia K, Mucci-Hennekinne S, Casa C, Brachet D, Meunier K, Briennon X et al (2010) Intraperitoneal mesh repair of small ventral abdominal wall hernias with a Ventralex hernia patch. Dig Surg 27(5):433–435 (Clinical trial)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tollens T, Den Hondt M, Devroe K, Terry C, Speybroeck S, Aelvoet C et al (2011) Retrospective analysis of umbilical, epigastric, and small incisional hernia repair using the Ventralex hernia patch. Hernia 15(5):531–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

    Jeroen E. H. Ponten, Irene Thomassen & Simon W. Nienhuijs

Authors
  1. Jeroen E. H. Ponten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irene Thomassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon W. Nienhuijs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen E. H. Ponten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ponten, J.E.H., Thomassen, I. & Nienhuijs, S.W. A Collective Review on Mesh-Based Repair of Umbilical and Epigastric Hernias. Indian J Surg 76, 371–377 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0920-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0920-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation