Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of pH on the efficiency of an SBR processing piggery wastewater

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To treat piggery wastewater efficiently, the hydrolysis of urea (mainly derived from swine urine) in piggery wastewater with the change of sewage pH must be considered. Using activated sludge, piggery wastewater was treated in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR), and the effects of influent pH on SBR processing efficiency, sludge settle ability, and sludge activity were investigated. The results showed that a high influent pH value contributed to the improvement of the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen and reduction of the chemical oxygen demand (COD). When the influent pH was between 9.0 and 9.5, the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen was higher than 90%, and the reduction of COD from its original value was 80%. The influent pH had a greater influence on sludge concentration and sludge activity. When the influent pH increased from 7.0 to 9.5, the sludge concentration increased from 2,350 to 3,947 mg/L in the reactor, and the activities of ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) first increased and then decreased. When the influent pH was 9.0 and 8.0, the maximum values (0.48 g O2/(g MLSS/day) and 0.080 g O2/(g MLSS/day)) were reached, and the sludge settling ratio was nearly steady between 20 and 35% in each reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, W., S. G. Shin, K. J. Cho, C. Lee, and S. Hwang (2012) Performance of methanogenic reactors in temperature phased two-stage anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 114: 635–639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajagopal, R., P. Rousseau, N. Bernet, and F. Beline (2011) Combined anaerobic and activated sludge anoxic/oxic treatment for piggery wastewater. Bioresource Technology. 102: 2185–2192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Song, Y. H., G. L. Qiu, P. Yuan, X. Y. Cui, J. F. Peng, P. Zeng, L. Duan, L. C. Xiang, and F. Qian (2011) Nutrients removal and recovery from anaerobically digested swine wastewater by struvite crystallization without chemical additions. J. Hazardous Mat. 190: 140–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, Y. H., S. Kumar, J. H. Kwag, J. H. Kim, J. D. Kim, and C. S. Ra (2011) Recycle of electrolytically dissolved struvite as an alternative to enhance phosphate and nitrogen recovery from swine wastewater. J. Hazardous Mat. 195: 175–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lahav, O., Y. Schwartz, P. Nativ, and Y. Gendel (2013) Sustainable removal of ammonia from anaerobic-lagoon swine waste effluents using an electrochemically-regenerated ion exchange process. Chem. Eng. J. 218: 214–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deng, L. W., P. Zheng, and Z. A. Chen (2006) Anaerobic digestion and post-treatment of swine wastewater using IC-SBR process with bypass of raw wastewater. Proc. Biochem. 41: 965–969.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takaaki, M., C. M. Liao, and X. D. Feng (1995) Nitrogen and phosphorous removal for swine wastewater using intermittent aeration batch reactor followed by ammonium crystallization process. J. Wat. Res. 29: 2643–2650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, J. Q., W. Hu, and Y. Z. Tang (1997) A comparative study on the devices of anaerobic treatment of pig manure at low temperature and nearly middle temperature. J. China Biogas. 15: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng, W., X. L. Xie, and R. Z. Chen (1998) The analysis of discharge and treatment situation of livestock wastewater in Guangzhou city. J. Agro-Environ. Develop. 15: 17–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng, Y. X., C. Lin, and J. H. Wang (2006) The research progress of biological treatment technology on piggery wastewater. J. Acta Ecologae Animalis Domestic. 27: 106–108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mota, C., M. A. Head, and J. A. Ridenoure (2005) Effects of aeration cycles on nitrobacterial populations and nitrogen removal in intermittently aerated reactors. J. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 8565–8572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone, J. J., A S. Oswald, C D. Lupo, S A. Clay, and H. V. Mott (2011) Impact of chlortetracycline on sequencing batch reactor performance for swine manure treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 7807–7814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Masse, D. I., L. Masse, Y. Xia, and Y. Gilbert (2010) Potential of low-temperature anaerobic digestion to address current environmental concerns on swine production. J. Anim. Sci. 88: 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim, S. J., W. Park, T. H. Kim, and I. H. Shin (2012) Swine wastewater treatment using a unique sequence of ion exchange membranes and bioelectrochemical system. Bioresour. Technol. 118: 163–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng, D., L. W. Deng, Z. H. Fan, G. J. Liu, C. Chen, H. Yang, and Y. Liu (2012) Influence of sand layer depth on partial nitritation as pretreatment of anaerobically digested swine wastewater prior to anammox. Bioresour. Technol. 104: 274–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stone, J. J., A. S. Oswald, C. D. Lupo, S. A. Clay, and H. V. Mott (2011) Impact of chlortetracycline on sequencing batch reactor performance for swine manure treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 7807–7814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Groeneweg, J., B. Sellner, and W. Tappe (1994) Ammonia oxidation in nitrosomonas at NH3 concentrations near Km: Effects of pH and temperature. J. Water Res. 28: 2561–2566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelley, J. C., G. E. Becker, and A. Nason (1970) Characterization of the particulate nitrite oxidase and its component activities from the chemoautotroph. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 205: 409–425.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vadivelu, V. M., J. Keller, and Z. G. Yuan (2006) Effect of free ammonia and free Nitrous acid concentration on the anabolic and catabolic processes of an enriched Nitrosomonas culture. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 9: 830–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. APHA (1995) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington D. C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Park, S. W. Bae, J. Chung, and S. C. Baek (2007) Empirical model of the pH dependence of the maximum specific nitrification rate. Proc. Biochem. 42: 1671–1676.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilar, A. M. Eiroa, C. Kennes, and M. Veiga (2010) The SHARON process in the treatment of landfill leachate. Water Sci. Technol. 61: 47–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Anthonisen, A. C., R. C. Loehr, T. B. S. Prakasam, and E. G. Srinath (1976) Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 48: 835–852.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liang, Z., Han, Z., Yang, S., X. Liang, P. Du, G. Liu, and Y. Yang (2011) A control strategy of partial nitritation in a fixed bed bioflimreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 710–715.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Su, J. J., W. C. Lian, and J. F. Wu (1999) Studies on swine wastewater treatment by a full scale sequencing batch reactor after anaerobic fermentation. Chung-HuaNungxue Huibao. 188: 47–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tilche, A., E. Bacilieri, G. Bortone, F. Malaspina, S. Piccinini, and L. Stante (1999) Biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a full scale sequencing batch reactor treating piggery wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 40: 199–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ra, C. S., K. V. Lo, and D. S. Mavinic (1998) Real-time control of two-stage sequencing, batch reactor system for the treatment of animal wastewater. Environ. Technol. 19: 343–356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shin, J. H., S. M. Lee, J. Y. Jung, Y. C. Chung, and S. H. Nohc (2005) Enhanced COD and nitrogen removals for the treatment of swine wastewater by combining submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) and anaerobic upflow bed filter (AUBF) reactor. Proc. Biochem. 40: 3769–3776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Andreadakis, A. D. (1992) Anaerobic digestion of piggery wastes. Water Sci. Technol. 25: 9–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lim, S. J. W. Park, T. H. Kim, and I. H. Shin (2012) Swine wastewater treatment using a unique sequence of ion exchange membranes and bioelectrochemical system. Bioresour. Technol. 118: 163–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao, Q. L., and X. Z. Li (1998) The inhibitory action of ammonia nitrogen on microbial activity in landfill leachate. J. Environ. Pollut. Control. 20: 1–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chudoba, P., A. Morel, and B. Capedeville (1992) The case of both energetic uncoupling and metabolic selection of microorganisms in the OSA activated sludge system”. Environ. Technol. 13: 761–770.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, L., Liu, Y., Ren, Y. et al. The effect of pH on the efficiency of an SBR processing piggery wastewater. Biotechnol Bioproc E 18, 1230–1237 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0292-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-013-0292-6

Keywords