Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of vehicle structural performance during small-overlap frontal impact

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the vehicle structural performance in the event of a small-overlap frontal impact (SOFI), based on a computer-based crash simulation model. The vehicle model was used for SOFI simulation according to real small-overlap test conditions. The crash simulation results were used to evaluate the overall vehicle structure through a comparison of intrusion measurements with the rating guidelines of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The parts sensitive to a small-overlap crash were confirmed. Thickness optimization was conducted to strengthen the rocker panel, A-pillar, and lower hinge pillar in order to improve the vehicle structural performance in the event of a SOFI. The best values among the variables were chosen for the new design. The crash analysis using finite element models showed that the most serious deformation occurred to the A-pillar. In this study, the grade of the overall structure was changed from “poor” to “marginal”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bois, P. D., Chou, C. C., Fileta, B. B., Khalil, T. B., King, A. L., Mahmood, H. F., Mertz, H. J. and Wismans, J. (2004). Vehicle Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection. American Iron and Steel Institute Southfield. Michigan. 11–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumbelow, M. L. and Zuby, D. S. (2012). Impact and injury patterns in frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection. IIHS Paper 09–0257.USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, W. M., Kim, J. S., Jung, H. S. and Kwon, T. S. (2011). Effect of punch angle on energy absorbing characteristics of tube-type crash elements. Int. J. Automotive Technology 12, 3, 383–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gepner, B., Bojanowski, C., Kwasniewski, L. and Wekezer, J. (2014). Effectiveness of ECE R66 and FMVSS 220 standards in rollover crashworthiness assessment of paratransit buses. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 4, 581–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallquist, J. O. (2007). LS-DYNA Keyword User Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halloway, D. E., Pintar, F., Saunders, J. and Anelli, A. B. (2012). Classifiers to augment the CDC system to distinguish the role of structure in a frontal impact taxonomy. SAE Paper No. 2012-01-0575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S. W., Park, C. K. and Mohan, P. (2008). A study of the IIHS frontal pole impact test. SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (2012). Front Small-overlap Crashworthiness Evaluation Crash Test Protocol (Version I, II). IIHS. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (2014). Moderate Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Crash Test Protocol (Version XV). IIHS. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (2012). Smalloverlap Program Protocol and Rating Guidelines. IIHS. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, L., Mcinally, G., Axelson, A., Lindman, M., Kling, A., Broberg, T., Fermer, M. and Wagstrom, L. (2013). Severe frontal collisions with partial overlap-two decades of car safety development. SAE Paper No. 2013-01-0759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi, T., Naokao, T., Watanabe, T., Saeki, H. and Okabe, T. (2012). An investigation of injury factors concerning drivers in vehicles involved in small-overlap frontal crashes. SAE Paper No. 2012-01-0599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H., Joo, Y. J., Park, J. S., Kim, Y. S. and Yim, H. J. (2014). Robust design optimization of frontal structrures for minimizing injury risks of flex pedestrian legform impactor. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 5, 757–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murri, R., Caviezel, S. and Gerster, B. (2013). Relevance of the IIHS small-overlap crash test in Europe. Internal Study DTC Dynamic Test Center AG, Report Number pSi-13-0130.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Crash Analysis Center (2005). FE Model of Dodge Grand Caravan. The George Washington University. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J. IIHS. (2012). Results of small-overlap frontal crash tests. IIHS. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, S., Ye, B. W. and Sin, H. C. (2007). Size optimization of an engine room member for crashworthiness using response surface method. Int. J. Automotive Technology 8, 1, 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. T., Partyka, S. C., Morgan, R. M., Hackney, J. R., Lee, J. and Summers, L. (2000). Comparison of vehicle structural intergrity and occupant injury potential in fullfrontal and offset-frontal crash tests. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-0879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, C. (2012). Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. An Update on the IIHS Small-overlap Research Program. IIHS. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, C. (2013). Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. An update on the IIHS Small-overlap Ratings Program. IIHS. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, C., Mueller, B., Nolan, J. M., Zuby, D. S. and Lund, A. K. (2013). IIHS. Development of a Frontal Small-overlap Crashworthiness Evaluation Test. Traffic Injury Prevention. DOI:10.1080/15389588.790539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbina, P., Orta, P. and Ahuett, G. H. (2014). Crashworthiness design based on a simplified deceleration pulse. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 6, 909–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. J. Yim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, P.T.L., Lee, J.Y., Yim, H.J. et al. Analysis of vehicle structural performance during small-overlap frontal impact. Int.J Automot. Technol. 16, 799–805 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-015-0081-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-015-0081-7

Key Words

Navigation