Abstract
The activity of antagonistic substances produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Lactobacillus acidophilus against the planktonic and sessile populations of Staphylococcus aureus strains was demonstrated. The strongest effects were caused by probiotic L. acidophilus strain — bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) positive. However, the S. aureus A3 growth, adhesion and biofilm formation was also limited by cell-free supernatant of L. acidophilus H-1 (BLIS negative). Moreover, competitive direct interactions were observed between staphylococci and the above bacteria, which influenced the formation of dualspecies aggregates on the surface.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ATCC:
-
American Type Culture Collection
- BLIS:
-
bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances
- MHB:
-
Mueller-Hinton broth
- MRS:
-
De Man-Rogosa-Sharp (broth)
- MRSA:
-
methicillin-resistant S. aureus
- NCTC:
-
National Culture Type Collection
- MTT:
-
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
- TSB:
-
tryptic soya broth
- E.c.:
-
Escherichia coli
- P.a.:
-
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- E.f.:
-
Enterococcus faecalis
- P.m.:
-
Proteus mirabilis
- L.a.:
-
Lactobacillus acidophilus
References
Barequet I.S., Simon G.J., Safrin M., Ohman D.E., Kessler E.: Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasA protease in treatment of experimental staphylococcal keratitis. Antimicrob.Agents Chemother. 48, 1681–1687 (2004).
Cross M.L.: Microbes versus microbes: immune signals generated by probiotic lactobacilli and their role in protection against microbial pathogens. FEMS Immunol.Med.Microbiol. 34, 245–253 (2002).
Foster J.S., Kolenbrander P.E.: Development of a multispecies oral bacterial community in a saliva-conditioned flow cell. Appl. Environ.Microbiol. 70, 4340–4348 (2004).
Goldsworthy M.J.H.: Gene expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and MRSA within a catheter-associated urinary tract infection biofilm model. Biosci.Horizons1, 28–37 (2008).
Hall-stoodley L., Costerton J.W., Stoodley P.: Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nature Rev. 2, 95–106 (2004).
Hurdle J.G., Yendapally R., Sun D., Lee R.E.: Evaluation of analogs of reutericyclin as prospective candidates for the treatment of staphylococcal skin infections. Antimicrob.Agents Chemother. 53, 4028–4031 (2009).
Jenkinson H.F., Lamont R.J.: Oral microbial communities in sickness and in health. Trends Microbiol. 13, 589–595 (2005)
Kaufmann G.F., Sartorio R., Lee S.-H., Rogers C.J., Meijler M.M., Moss J.A., Clapham B., Brogan A.P., Dickerson T.J., Janda K.D.: Revisiting quorum sensing: discovery of additional chemical and biological functions for 3-oxo-N-acylhomoserine lactones. PNAS102, 309–314 (2005).
Kimizuka R., Kato T., Ishihara K., Okuda K.: Mixed infections with Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola cause excessive inflammatory responses in a mouse pneumonia model compared with monoinfections. Microbes Infect. 5, 1357–1362 (2003).
Koninkx J.F.J.G., Malago J.J.: The protective potency of probiotic bacteria and their microbial products against enteric infections — review. Folia Microbiol. 53, 189–194 (2006).
Mackie R.I., Sghir A., Gaskins H.R.: Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Am.J.Clin.Nutr. 69(Suppl.), 1035S–1045S (1999).
Mastropaolo M.D., Evans N.P., Byrnes M.K., Stevens A.M., Robertson J.L., Melville S.B.: Synergy in polymicrobial infections in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Infect.Immun. 73, 6055–6063 (2005).
Michel-Briand Y., Baysse C.: The pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochimie84, 499–510 (2002).
Millsap K., Reid G., van der Mei H., Busscher H.J.: Displacement of Enterococcus faecalis from hydrophobic and hydrophilic substrata by Lactobacillus and Streptococcus spp. as studied in a parallel plate flow chamber. Appl.Environ.Microbiol. 60, 1867–1874 (1994).
Quazi S., Middleton B., Muharram S.H., Cockayne A., Hill P., O’shea P., Chhabra S.R., Camara M., Williams P.: N-Acylhomoserine lactones antagonize virulence gene expression and quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect.Immun. 74, 910–919 (2006).
Reid G., Tieszer C., Lam D.: Influence of lactobacilli on the adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans to fibers and epithelial cells. J.Ind.Microbiol. 15, 248–253 (1995).
Reid G., Howard J., Gan B.S.: Can bacterial interference prevent infection? Trends Microbiol. 9, 424–428 (2001).
Tait K., Sutherland I.W.: Antagonistic interactions amongst bacteriocin-producing enteric bacteria in dual species biofilms. J.Appl. Microbiol. 93, 345–352 (2002).
Vesterlund S., Karp M., Salminen S., Ouwehand A.C.: Staphylococus aureus adheres to human intestinal mucus but can be displaced by certain lactic acid bacteria. Microbiology152, 1819–1826 (2006).
Vlková E., Rada V., Šmechilová M., Killer J.: Auto-aggregation and co-aggregation ability in bifidobacteria and clostridia. Folia Microbiol. 53, 263–269 (2008).
Walencka E., Sadowska B., Różalska S., Hryniewicz W., Różalska B.: Staphylococcus aureus biofilm as a target for single or repeated doses of oxacillin, vancomycin, linezolid and/or lysostaphin. Folia Microbiol. 51, 381–386 (2006).
Walencka E., Różalska S., Sadowska B., Różalska B.: The influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived surfactants on staphylococcal adhesion and biofilm formation. Folia Microbiol. 53, 61–68 (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadowska, B., Walencka, E., Wieckowska-Szakiel, M. et al. Bacteria competing with the adhesion and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus . Folia Microbiol 55, 497–501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-010-0082-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-010-0082-x