Skip to main content
Log in

Examination of the optimal temporal resolution required for computed tomography coronary angiography

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sub-second multidetector-row computed tomography systems provide great potential for the further improvement of CT coronary angiography (CTCA). However, because the temporal resolution (TR) of such CT systems is insufficient, blurring and artifacts produced by fast cardiac motion remain as unresolved issues. Previous TR investigations of CTCA were based on the retrospective electrocardiogram-gated multisegment reconstruction technique. However, the results obtained may not necessarily be correct because the TR of multisegment reconstruction may not be substantial due to the insufficient periodicity of cardiac motion. The optimal TR required for better CTCA images was evaluated with use of a dual-source CT system, which has various substantial TR modes (83, 125, and 165 ms). CTCA images of 147 patients with heart rates (HRs) ranging from 36 to 117 beats/minute (bpm) were evaluated visually on a 4-point scale. Our results revealed not only that the 165-ms TR is sufficient for low HRs (≤60 bpm), but also that the 83- and 125-ms TRs are unnecessary for such HRs. The image quality with the 125-ms TR mode was acceptable for the left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, and right coronary artery at low to intermediate HRs (≤70 bpm). At high HRs (>70 bpm), the 83-ms TR mode resulted in an excellent image quality for all cases except those with very rapid RCA motion. Adequate TRs for a wide range of heart rates (52–106 bpm) are thus clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group: American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCollough CH, Schmidt B, Yu L, et al. Measurement of temporal resolution in dual source CT using a visually intuitive technique. Med Phys. 2008;35(2):764–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ertel D, Kröber E, Kyriakou Y, Langner O, Kalender WA. Modulation transfer function-based assessment of temporal resolution: validation for single- and dual-source CT. Radiology. 2008;248(3):1013–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA. ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. Med Phys. 2000;27(8):1881–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:537–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bedayat Arash, Frank J, Rybicki, et al. Reduced exposure using asymmetric cone beam processing for wide area detector cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:381–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gagarina NV, Irwan R, Gordina G, et al. Image quality in reduced-dose coronary CT angiography. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:984–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kachelriess M, Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA. ECG-correlated imaging of the heart with subsecond multislice spiral CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;19:888–901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Halliburton SS, Stillman AE, Flohr T, et al. Do segmented reconstruction algorithms for cardiac multi-slice computed tomography improve image quality? Herz. 2003;28:20–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Heuschmid M, et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice spiral computed tomography: image quality in patients with high heart rates. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1434–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography is improved at low heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2006;22:101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology. 2005;234:86–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dewey M, Hoffmann H. HammB. Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. ROFO Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed. 2006;178:600–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Decramer I, Vanhoenacker PK, Sarno G, et al. Effects of sublingual nitroglycerin on coronary lumen diameter and number of visualized septal branches on 64-MDCT angiography. AJR. 2008;190:219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:122–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia—initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2414–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:318–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun ML, Lu B, Wu RZ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering on different heart rate patients. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1635–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baumuller S, Leschka S, Desbiolles L, et al. Dual-source versus 64-section CT coronary angiography at lower heart rates: comparison of accuracy and radiation dose. Radiology. 2009;253:56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Donnino R, Jacobs JE, Doshi JV, et al. Dual-source versus single-source cardiac CT angiography: comparison of diagnostic image quality. AJR. 2009;192:1051–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuya Ohashi.

About this article

Cite this article

Ohashi, K., Ichikawa, K., Hara, M. et al. Examination of the optimal temporal resolution required for computed tomography coronary angiography. Radiol Phys Technol 6, 453–460 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0218-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0218-1

Keywords

Navigation