Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do Households Prioritise Children? Intra-Household Deprivation a Case Study of the South Pacific

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is increasing evidence of unequal access to resources within the household between children and adults. The literature suggests that patterns of intra-household inequality are context specific: while some find that households prioritise children (Main and Bradshaw 2016), others find that children are more likely to experience the consequences of poverty (Brown et al. 2018a). In Tonga, the high value of children, role of women in decision making and low extreme poverty rates suggest that households will prioritise children. However, the data does not match this expectation. Where possible households share resources equally. In contexts of low resources, both adults and children may be prioritised. This article builds on the methodology developed by Main and Bradshaw to provide the first analysis of intra-household inequalities between children and adults in the South Pacific. It argues that deprivation patterns are shaped both by household decisions on resource allocation and by wider access to resources. The approach used can be applied in other contexts to explore deprivation patterns and inform anti-poverty strategies. The article contributes to the growing literature on intra-household inequalities between children and adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since its development in the UK in the 1980s, the consensual approach (Mack and Lansley 1985) has been used for the analysis of poverty and deprivation worldwide (e.g. Halleröd 1994; Noble et al. 2004; Abe and Pantazis 2013; Nandy and Pomati 2015; Depio et al. 2018; Fifita et al. 2018) including Tonga and Tuvalu in the South Pacific.

  2. Access to other resources, such as welfare provision (including services in kind such as education and health), and more widely resource availability (e.g. in the private market) shape household’s experiences of poverty and deprivation (Paulus et al. 2010; Guio et al. 2017) and are likely to affect the intra-household allocation of resources.

  3. For each item they lack, respondents are asked whether they lack the item because they cannot afford it, they do not want it or for another reason. Only individuals and households who lack an item because they cannot afford it are categorised as deprived for that item.

  4. Adults living in households with children have very similar deprivation rates to all adults.

  5. Children’s perceptions and preferences may differ from those of adults (Mood and Jonsson 2016; Abe 2018), however the data do not allow the exploration of these differences.

  6. The average adjusted income per capita for these groups is around 850–900 Pa′anga with large and overlapping confidence intervals.

  7. All child items in the survey are included regardless of whether they are in the MDI as all were identified by the pubic as items no-one should do without.

References

  • Abe, A. K. (2018). Developing deprivation index for children taking into account of adaptive preferences. Child Indicators Research, 12(2), 647–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abe, A., & Pantazis, C. (2013). Comparing public perceptions of the necessities of life across two societies, Japan and the United Kingdom. Social Policy and Society, 13(1), 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, D., and Pollard, S. (2004) Hardship and Poverty in the Pacific. Manila: ADB.

  • ADB. (2018). Basic Development Statistics. Asian Development Bank. https://www.adb.org/publications/basic-statistics-2018.

  • Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, S., Ferreira, F. H. G., Özler, B., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Relative effectiveness of conditional and unconditional cash transfers for schooling outcomes in developing countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2013, 8. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2013.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J.M., and Ziparo, R., (2017) Intra-household bargaining in poor countries. WIDER working paper 2017/2018. April 2017.

  • Bennet, F. (2013). Researching within-household distribution: Overview, developments, debates and methodological challenge. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 582–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, G. (2006). Introduction: The MIRAB model in the twenty-first century. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 47(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2006.00296.x.

  • Brown, R. P. C., Connell, J., & Jimenez-Soto, E. V. (2014). Migrants remittances, poverty and social protection in the South Pacific: Fiji and Tonga. Population, Space and Place, 20, 434–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Calvi, R. and Penglase, J. (2018a), Sharing the Pie: Undernutrition, Intra-Household Allocation, and Poverty. SSRN Papers. (June 1, 2018). Available at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3199129 (Accessed: 26/07/2019).

  • Brown, C., Ravallion, M., & VandeWalle, D. (2018b). Most of Africa’s nutritionally-deprived women and children are not found in poor households. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00800.

  • Chant, S. (2007) Children in female headed households. New working paper series, 19. LSE gender institute. http://www.lse.ac.uk/gender/assets/documents/research/working-papers/Children-In-Female-Headed-Households.pdf (Accessed: 24/07/2019).

  • de Vreyer, R., & Lambert, S. (2018). By ignoring intra-household inequality, do we underestimate the extent of poverty? Bristol: PSE Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Zwarte, I. (2016). Coordinating hunger: The evacuation of children during the Dutch food crisis, 1945. War & Society, 36(2), 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delamonica, E. (2014) ‘Multiple approaches to the measurement of multidimensional poverty are used internationally, based on varying understandings of poverty and dimensions’. CROP Poverty Brief 23.

  • Depio, S., Ahaibwe, G., Kasirye, I., Nandy, S., & Pomati, M. (2018). Child poverty and deprivation in refugee hosting areas. Evidence from Uganda. Kampala: EPRC, UNICEF and Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fifita, V. (2016) Child and adult poverty in a small island developing state: a case study of Tonga. PhD Thesis. University of Bristol. Available at: https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=7&uin=uk.bl.ethos.723436

  • Fifita, V., Lanau, A., Najera, H., & Gordon, D. (2018). Assessing progress towards the eradication of poverty in the Kingdom of Tonga. Tongatapu: Tonga Department of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filihia, M. (2001). Men are from Maama, women are from Pulotu: Female status in Tongan society. The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 110(4), 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (2006). The concept and measure of poverty. In C. Pantazis, D. Gordon, & R. Levitas (Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion in Britain (pp. 29–69). Bristol: Policy Press Available at: http://www.poverty.ac.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., & Nandy, S. (2012). Measuring child poverty and deprivation. In A. Minujin & S. Nandy (Eds.), Global child poverty and well-being: Measurement, concepts, policy and action (pp. 57–101). Bristol: Policy Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesalaga, R., & Marshall, P. (2008). Purchasing power at the bottom of the pyramid: Differences across geographic regions and income tiers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guio, A.C., Fusco, A. and Marlier, E. (2009) Measuring material deprivation in the EU: Indicators for the whole population and child specific indicators, Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • Guio, A. C., Gordon, D., Najera, H., & Pomati, M. (2017). Revisiting the EU material deprivation variables. Statistical working papers. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B. (1994) ‘A new approach to the direct consensual measurement of poverty’, SPRC Discussion Paper no. 50, social policy research Centre, University of new South Wales.

  • Hamilton, K., & Catterall, M. (2010). Consuming love in poor families: children’s influence on consumption decisions. Journal of Marketing Management, 22(9–10), 1031–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris-Fry, H., Shrestha, N., Costello, A., & Saville, N. M. (2017). Determinants of intra-household food allocation between adults in South Asia - a systematic review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0603-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, K. (1983). Gender relations in Tonga. The Journal of the Polynesian Society, 92(2), 233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S. and Lahoti, R., (2016) How serious is the neglect of intra-household inequality in Multidimensional poverty indices? Courant research Centre discussion papers. 200. March 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2742083 (Accessed: 26/07/2019).

  • Lau, M., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Child well-being in the Pacific rim. Child Indicators Research, 3, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9064-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, M., Gordon, D., Zhang, M., & Bradshaw, J. (2019). Children’s and adults’ perceptions of child necessities in Hong Kong. Social Policy and Administration, 53, 835–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2017). Gender in contemporary Tonga. The Contemporary Pacific, 29(1), 66–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J., & Lansley, S. (1985). Poor Britain. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, G. (2019). Fair shares and families: A child-focused model of intra-household sharing. Childhood Vulnerability Journal, 1, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, G., & Bradshaw, J. (2012). A child material deprivation index. Child Indicators Research, 5(3), 503–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main, G., & Bradshaw, J. (2016). Child poverty in the UK: Measures, prevalence and intra-household sharing. Critical Social Policy, 36(1), 38–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, M., & Verwimp, P. (2017). Are we counting all the poor? Accounting for the Intra-Household Allocation of Consumption in Burundi. Journal of Demographic Economics, 83(3), 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minujin, A., & Nandy, S. (Eds.). (2012). Global child poverty and well-being: Measurement, concepts, policy and action. Bristol: Policy Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mood, C., & Jonsson, J. O. (2016). Trends in child poverty in Sweden: Parental and child reports. Child Indicators Research, 9(3), 825–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, H. (1996). Becoming Tongan: An ethnography of childhood. University of Hawai’i Press.

  • Nájera Catalán, H. E. (2018). Reliability, population classification and weighting in multidimensional poverty measurement: A Monte Carlo study. Social Indicators Research, 142(3), 887–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, S., & Pomati, M. (2015). Applying the consensual method of estimating poverty in a low income African setting. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 124–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, M., Ratcliffe, A., & Wright, G. (2004). Conceptualizing, defining and measuring poverty in South Africa: An argument for a consensual approach. Oxford: Centre for the Analysis of South African Social Policy, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2011). Poverty and deprivation in Europe. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, M., & Parker, L. (2010). How adequately are food needs of children in low-income households being met? Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1175–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldewage-Theron, W. H., Dicks, E. G., & Napier, C. E. (2006). Poverty, household food insecurity and nutrition: Coping strategies in an informal settlement in the Vaal triangle, South Africa. Public Health, 120(9), 795–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, A., Sutherland, H., & Tsakloglou, P. (2010). The distributional impact of in-kind public benefits in European countries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(2), 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, D., & Wu, Y. (2019). Comparing the extent and levels of child poverty by the income and multidimensional deprivation approach in China. Child Indicators Research, 12(2), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9544-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, E., Theobald, S., George, A., Kim, J., Ruder, C., Jehan, K., & Tolhurst, R. (2013). Going beyond the surface: Gendered intra-household bargaining as a social determinant of child health and nutrition in low and middle income countries. Social Science and Medicine, 93, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, T. (2002). Childhood poverty and social exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, S. (1988). Direct and indirect measures of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, 17(3), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, L. (2016). Intrahousehold inequality in child rights and well-being: A barrier to progress? Wold Development, 83, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonga Department of Statistics (2014) Tonga 2011 Census of Population and Housing, Volume 2: Analytical Report Kingdom of Tonga. https://tonga.prism.spc.int/census-population#reports (Accessed: 01/08/2019).

  • Tonga Department of Statistics (2017) Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2015/16. Kingdom of Tonga. Full report October 2017. https://tonga.prism.spc.int/tdos-documents-library?view=download&fileId=2244 (Accessed: 01/08/2019).

  • Tonga Department of Statistics (2019a) Labour market statistics. https://tonga.prism.spc.int/economic/labour-market-statistics (Accessed: 01/08/2019).

  • Tonga Department of Statistics (2019b) Consumer Price Index. CPI components. https://tonga.prism.spc.int/economic/consumer-price-index#cpi-components (Accessed: 01/08/2019).

  • Torre, A. R., & Cangiano, A. (2018). When children are not ‘the left behind’: Transnational practices of intra-regional mobility in the South Pacific. Transitions: Journal of Transient Migration, 2(1), 46–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2019) Gender Inequality Index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/composite/GII (Accessed: 24/07/2019).

  • Wong, Y., Wang, T., & Xu, Y. (2015). Poverty and quality of life of Chinese children: From the perspective of deprivation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(3), 236–247.

  • World Bank. (2012). Gender Equality and Development. World Development Report. Washington: WB.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Economic and Social Research Council for their funding through the Global Challenges initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alba Lanau.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Adult and child items, HIES 2015/2016
Table 8 Descriptive data. Regression sample. Unweighted

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanau, A., Fifita, V. Do Households Prioritise Children? Intra-Household Deprivation a Case Study of the South Pacific. Child Ind Res 13, 1953–1973 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09729-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-020-09729-5

Keywords

Navigation