Abstract
Pharmacological study is predictably effective in establishing an optimal monitoring strategy for the usage of cyclosporine A (CsA) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. Pharmacokinetic profiling of 33 recipients administered CsA twice daily by 3-h intravenous infusion revealed that levels peaked 2–3 h after the start of infusion, and an exponential decline of CsA concentrations after the termination of infusion was observed. The correlation between the area under the curve (AUC0–12) and CsA concentration at various time points after infusion revealed that C 2 and C 3 correlated best with AUC0–12 (r 2 = 0.725), while the trough concentration correlated poorly. Ex vivo T cell stimulation followed by intracellular cytokine detection with flow cytometry revealed that the capacity of T cells to produce cytokines upon stimulation was inversely proportional to the CsA concentration, and reached a minimum at about 700 ng/mL with a marginal decrease above this concentration. Extrapolation using the regression equations of this study and the data from our retrospective study leads to the assumption that the dose adjustment of CsA based on maintaining the C 3 concentration above 800 ng/mL may effectively prevent acute GVHD. To confirm this assumption, a prospective clinical study is required.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferrara JL, Cooke KR, Teshima T. The pathophysiology of acute graft-versus-host disease. Int J Hematol. 2003;78:181–7.
Ferrara JL, Levine JE, Reddy P, Holler E. Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet. 2009;373:1550–61.
Devergie A. Graft vs. host disease. In: Apperley J, Carreras E, Gluckman E, Gratwohl A, Masszi T, editors. Haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, the EBMT Handbook 2004 revised edn. Forum Service Editore; 2004. p.162–77.
Chao NJ, Sullivan KM. Pharmacologic prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease. In: Appelbaum FR, Forman SJ, Negrin RS, Blume KG, editors. Thomas’ hematopoietic cell transplantation, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing; 2009. p. 1257–74.
Ruutu T, Niederwieser D, Gratwohl A, Apperley JF. A survey of the prophylaxis and treatment of acute GVHD in Europe: a report of the European Group for Blood and Marrow, Transplantation (EBMT). Chronic Leukaemia Working Party of the EBMT. Bone Marrow Transpl. 1997;19:759–64.
Halloran PF, Helms LM, Kung L, Noujaim J. The temporal profile of calcineurin inhibition by cyclosporine in vivo. Transplantation. 1999;68:1356–61.
Sindhi R, LaVia MF, Paulling E, McMichael J, Burckart G, Shaw S, et al. Stimulated response of peripheral lymphocytes may distinguish cyclosporine effect in renal transplant recipients receiving a cyclosporine + rapamycin regimen. Transplantation. 2000;69:432–6.
Kahan BD. Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine: 20 years of progress. Transpl Proc. 2004;36(Suppl 2S):378S–91S.
Nashan B, Cole E, Levy G, Thervet E. Clinical validation studies of Neoral C(2) monitoring: a review. Transplantation. 2002;73:S3–11.
Levy G, Thervet E, Lake J, Uchida K. Consensus on Neoral C(2) Expert Review in Transplantation (CONCERT) Group. Patient management by Neoral C(2) monitoring: an international consensus statement. Transplantation. 2002;73:S12–8.
Knight SR, Morris PJ. The clinical benefits of cyclosporine C2-level monitoring a systematic review. Transplantation. 2007;83:1525–35.
Duncan N, Craddock C. Optimizing the use of cyclosporin in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2006;38:169–74.
Izumi N, Furukawa T, Sato N, Okazuka K, Tsukada N, Abe T, et al. Risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: retrospective analysis of 73 patients who received cyclosporin A. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2007;40:875–80.
Sato N, Furukawa T, Kuroha T, Hashimoto S, Masuko M, Takahashi H, et al. High-dose cytosine arabinoside and etoposide with total body irradiation as a preparatory regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2004;34:299–303.
Picker LJ, Singh MK, Zdraveski Z, Treer JR, Waldrop SL, Bergstresser PR, et al. Direct demonstration of cytokine synthesis heterogeneity among human memory/effector T cells by flow cytometry. Blood. 1995;86:1408–19.
Fukudo M, Yano I, Masuda S, Fukatsu S, Katsura T, Ogura Y, et al. Pharmacodynamic analysis of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in living-donor liver transplant patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;78:168–81.
Batiuk TD, Pazderka F, Enns J, DeCastro L, Halloran PF. Cyclosporine inhibition of calcineurin activity in human leukocytes in vivo is rapidly reversible. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:1254–60.
Hendriks MP, Blijlevens NM, Schattenberg AV, Burger DM, Donnelly JP. Cyclosporine short infusion and C2 monitoring in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2006;38:521–5.
Nawa Y, Hara M, Tanimoto K, Nakase K, Kozuka T, Maeda Y. Single-dose daily infusion of cyclosporine for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA allele-matched, unrelated donors. Int J Hematol. 2006;83:159–63.
Ogawa N, Kanda Y, Matsubara M, Asano Y, Nakagawa M, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, et al. Increased incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease with the continuous infusion of cyclosporine A compared to twice-daily infusion. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2004;33:549–52.
Kanda Y, Hyo R, Yamashita T, Fujimaki K, Oshima K, Onoda M, Mori T, Sakura T, Tanaka M, Sakai M, Taguchi J, Kurakawa M, Maruta A, Okamoto S, Sakamaki H, Kanto Study Group of Cell Therapy. Effect of blood cyclosporine concentration on the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an HLA-matched sibling donor. Am J Hematol. 2006;81(11):838–44.
Oshima K, Kanda Y, Nakasone H, Arai S, Nishimoto N, Sato H, et al. Decreased incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease by continuous infusion of cyclosporine with a higher target blood level. Am J Hematol. 2008;83:226–32.
International Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group. Cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) absorption profiling and sparse-sample predictors during the first 3 months after renal transplantation. Am J Transpl. 2002;2:148–56.
Acknowledgments
We thank Miyako Baba and Yoko Tanahashi, Clinical Laboratory Division, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital for their excellent technical assistance and helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Furukawa, T., Kurasaki-Ida, T., Masuko, M. et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of cyclosporine A (CsA) to find the best single time point for the monitoring and adjusting of CsA dose using twice-daily 3-h intravenous infusions in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol 92, 144–151 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-010-0610-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-010-0610-0