Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Updates in the Surgical Management of Recurrent Clubfoot Deformity: a Scoping Review

  • Outcomes in Research in Orthopedics (O Ayeni, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This article focuses on the current advances in surgical management for clubfoot deformity, supported by up-to-date longitudinal studies on each approach.

Recent Findings

Long-term analysis following primary and repeated soft tissue releases has demonstrated good results in young patients with low relapse rates. Tibialis anterior transfer following the Ponseti method shows no difference in long-term pedographic analysis in comparison to the Ponseti method alone. Furthermore, tibialis anterior transfer following surgical relapses provides good long-term results with improved correction in talus-first metatarsal angle. Bony osteotomies may also play a role in addressing surgical relapses in older children. However, talar neck osteotomy may result in avascular necrosis of the talar dome. Hexapod external fixation may be considered by experienced surgeons to correct rigid clubfoot deformities in older patients with good long-term results and drastic improvements in pain perception. Long-term analysis of anterior distal tibial epiphysiodesis (ADTE) for recurrent equinus deformity following surgical correction has demonstrated statistical improvements in the anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA) and ankle dorsiflexion. Talectomy and naviculectomy are rarely used in today’s practice as long-term studies have demonstrated high relapse rates and residual pain impeding patient mobility.

Summary

Surgical correction following failure of the conservative approaches can be implemented to achieve full correction in clubfoot deformity. It is difficult to achieve a plantigrade feet with pain-free gait with repeated surgical interventions. Therefore, proper choice of the initial surgical technique is essential for achieving satisfactory long-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Holt JB, Oji DE, Yack HJ, Morcuende JA. Long-term results of tibialis anterior tendon transfer for relapsed idiopathic clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2015;97(1):47–55 This study demonstrates long-term results of tibialis anterior transfer in cases previously managed by the Ponseti technique. After detailed clinical and radiological assessments, results of the tendon transfer group were compared to the group of patients who underwent the Ponseti technique alone.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponseti IV. Relapsing clubfoot: causes, prevention and treatment. Iowa Orthop J. 2002;22:55–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):376–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hosseinzadeh P, Kiebzak GM, Dolan L, Zionts LE, Morcuende J. Management of clubfoot relapses with the Ponseti method: results of a survey of the POSNA members: results of a survey of the POSNA members. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(1):38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stouten JH, Besselaar AT, Van Der Steen MC. (marieke). Identification and treatment of residual and relapsed idiopathic clubfoot in 88 children. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(4):448–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Bosse HJP. Treatment of the neglected and relapsed clubfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(4):513–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Knutsen AR, Avoian T, Sangiorgio SN, Borkowski SL, Ebramzadeh E, Zionts LE. How do different anterior tibial tendon transfer techniques influence forefoot and hindfoot motion? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2015;473(5):1737–43 This study demonstrates the biomechanical effects of different tibialis anterior transfer techniques on forefoot and hindfoot. It shows difference in joints alignment angles with each technique to determine the proper tendon transfer technique in treatment of clubfoot relapse.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Radler C, Mindler GT. Treatment of severe recurrent clubfoot. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 2015;20(4):563–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelman K, Weiner DS, Morscher MA, Jones KC. Multiplanar supramalleolar osteotomy in the management of complex rigid foot deformities in children. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics. 2009;3(1):39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bocahut N, Simon A-L, Mazda K, Ilharreborde B, Souchet P. Medial to posterior release procedure after failure of functional treatment in clubfoot: a prospective study. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(2):109–17 This prospective discusses the use of less extensive posteromedial soft tissue release on patients that were previously treated with the French Functional Method of correction for clubfoot deformity. The authors used detailed gait assessment and radiological parameters to assess patients at each follow-up. The ICFSG scoring tool was used to evaluate final outcomes at the end of the study. Although the study demonstrated good outcomes at the latest follow-up, the authors attributed relapses following surgical correction to patients with severe deformities at birth and those with non-idiopathic clubfeet.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuo KN, Smith PA. Correcting residual deformity following clubfoot releases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(5):1326–33 This retrospective study provides some evidence as to why relapses occur following clubfoot releases. The authors suggest that age may play an important role in unsuccessful surgical correction. The authors also suggest that over lengthening of the Achilles tendon may also occur if surgical correction was performed at an early age.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunkley M, Gelfer Y, Jackson D, Parnell E, Armstong J, Rafter C, et al. Mid-term results of a physiotherapist-led Ponseti service for the management of non-idiopathic and idiopathic clubfoot. J Child Orthop. 2015;9(3):183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McKay SD, Dolan LA, Morcuende JA. Treatment results of late-relapsing idiopathic clubfoot previously treated with the Ponseti method. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(4):406–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richards BS, Faulks S, Rathjen KE, Karol LA, Johnston CE, Jones SA. A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(11):2313–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Bosse HJP. Treatment of the neglected and relapsed clubfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(4):513–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Siapkara A, Duncan R. Congenital talipes equinovarus: a review of current management. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89-B(8):995–1000.

  17. Erdman AL, Jeans KA, Karol LA. Plantar pressures following surgical release in children with clubfoot: comparison of posterior release, posteromedial release, and nonoperative correction: comparison of posterior release, posteromedial release, and nonoperative correction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020;40(7):e634–40 This prospective study uses pedobarograph data to compare outcomes following isolated posterior release, posteromedial release following recurrence and residual deformity, and non-operative correction. The authors perform a detailed assessment of pressure data in multiple foot regions to assess favorable outcomes. The data collected during the study indicates that limited surgical correction provides comparable pressure variables to patients treated non-operatively.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mehrafshan M, Rampal V, Seringe R, Wicart P. Recurrent club-foot deformity following previous soft-tissue release: mid-term outcome after revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91-B(7):949–54 This study demonstrates long-term outcomes following repeat surgical correction for clubfoot relapses. The mean follow-up period (12 years) is sufficient enough to draw statistical conclusions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Radler C, Mindler GT. Treatment of severe recurrent clubfoot. Foot and Ankle Clinics. 2015;20(4):563–86 The article categorizes the different surgical techniques according to various clubfoot deformities in great detail.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. LampasiM BC, Palmonari M, Donzelli O. Transfer of the tendon of tibialis anterior in relapsed congenital clubfoot. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British volume. 2010;92-B(2):277–83 This study demonstrates long-term results of tibialis tendon transfer after surgical interventions. The article reveals that multiple surgical interventions make it difficult to achieve pain-free, plantigrade, and functional foot.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahadev A, Munajat I, Mansor A, Hui JH. Combined lateral and transcuneiform without medial osteotomy for residual clubfoot for children. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2009;467(5):1319–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Loza ME, SNG B, El-Barbary HM, Hanna AA-A, Tarraf YN, Lotfy AA. Double column osteotomy for correction of residual adduction deformity in idiopathic clubfoot. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2010;92(8):673–9 This study demonstrates the results of double column osteotomy for bean-shaped foot deformity. All patients had idiopathic clubfeet with an age range of 3–7 years. A point scoring system was used to assess the results both clinically and radiologically. The authors demonstrated the effectiveness of the double osteotomy technique in the management of adduction, cavus, and rotational deformities associated with clubfoot.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elgeidi A, Abulsaad M. Combined double tarsal wedge osteotomy and transcuneiform osteotomy for correction of resistant clubfoot deformity (the “bean-shaped” foot). Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics. 2014;8(5):399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huber H, Galantay R, Dutoit M. Avascular necrosis after osteotomy of the talar neck to correct residual club-foot deformity in children. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British volume. 2002;84-B(3):426–30.

  25. Ganger R, Radler C, Handlbauer A, Grill F. External fixation in clubfoot treatment – a review of the literature. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B. 2012;21(1):52–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Riganti S, Coppa V, Nasto LA, Di Stadio M, Calevo MG, Gigante AP, et al. Treatment of complex foot deformities with hexapod external fixator in growing children and young adult patients. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2019;25(5):623–9 This retrospective study demonstrates the use of hexapod external fixator systems in treating complex clubfoot deformities. The authors conclude that although a plantigrade foot can be achieved using the hexapod external fixator, there may be some occurrence of minor complications and residual deformities. Therefore, these procedures should be carried out on an ideal candidate by a surgeon who has had extensive experience with external fixator system.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Floerkemeier T, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Windhagen H, Waizy H. Correction of severe foot deformities using the Taylor spatial frame. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:176–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eidelman M, Katzman A. Treatment of complex foot deformities in children with the Taylor spatial frame. Orthopedics. 2008;31.

  29. Eidelman M, Keren Y, Katzman A. Correction of residual clubfoot deformities in older children using the Taylor spatial butt frame and midfoot Gigli saw osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32:527–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Eidelman M, Katzman A, Bor N, Lamm B, Herzenberg J. Treatment of residual clubfoot deformities with the Taylor spatial frame using a Ponseti sequence. Orthop Proc. 2008;90-B:512–512.

  31. Waizy H, Windhagen H, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Floerkemeier T. Taylor spatial frame in severe foot deformities using double osteotomy: technical approach and primary results. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ebert N, Ballhause TM, Babin K, Schelling K, Stiel N, Stuecker R, et al. Correction of recurrent equinus deformity in surgically treated clubfeet by anterior distal tibial hemiepiphysiodesis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2020;40(9):520–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Legaspi J, Li YH, Chow W, Leong JC. Talectomy in patients with recurrent deformity in clubfoot. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British volume. 2001;83-B(3):384–7.

  34. Mubarak SI, Dimeglio A. Navicular excision and cuboid closing wedge for sever cavovarus foot deformities: a salvage procedure. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(5):551–6 This study demonstrates high recurrence rates and continued pain following naviculectomy as a salvage procedure for clubfoot deformity.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Westberry DE, Carpenter AM, Brown K, Hilton SB. Outcomes of naviculectomy for severe recurrent clubfoot deformity. April: Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics; 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. van Praag VM, Lysenko M, Harvey B, Yankanah R, Wright JG. Casting is effective for recurrence following Ponseti treatment of clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(12):1001–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mansoura International Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt

    Karim Gaber

  2. Faculty of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland – Medical University of Bahrain, Manama, Bahrain

    Basit Mir

  3. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 1200 Main St W, Room 4E15, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada

    Mohammed Shehab & Waleed Kishta

Authors
  1. Karim Gaber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Basit Mir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammed Shehab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Waleed Kishta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waleed Kishta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Not applicable.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Outcomes Research in Orthopedics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaber, K., Mir, B., Shehab, M. et al. Updates in the Surgical Management of Recurrent Clubfoot Deformity: a Scoping Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 15, 75–81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-022-09739-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-022-09739-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation