Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attachment-related anxiety and avoidance and regulation of interpersonal distance in close relationships

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the relationships between attachment related anxiety and avoidance and interpersonal distance with significant others (mother, father, close friend, love target), as well as, the childhood self. One hundred seventy four university students (85 male and 89 female; average age was 23.90 years, SD = 4.42; 24 [13.8%] were married) participated in the study. They completed Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures questionnaire (ECR-RS), followed by a computerized version of the comfortable interpersonal distance (CID) task in both the passive state (when protagonists approached them) and the active state (when they approached targets). We asked participants to determine the point at which they felt uncomfortable (the discomfort point) and the point at which they wanted to stop the protagonist (the stop point). Analyses revealed that: (1) Global avoidance scores predicted individuals’ distance to parents, whereas global anxiety scores predicted distance to future love’s view and childhood self; (2) As avoidance increased, individuals allowed their parents to intrude more into their personal spaces; (3) Attachment anxiety and avoidance predicted the passive state better than the active state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim, Y., Aviezer, O., Berson, Y., & Sagi, A. (2002). Attachment in infancy and personal space regulation in early adolescence. Attachment & Human Development, 4, 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Stoll, F., Fremmer-Bombik, E., Wartner, U., Zimmermann, P., & Grossmann, K. E. (2008). Is attachment at ages 1, 6 and 16 related to autonomy and relatedness behavior of adolescents in interaction towards their mothers? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(5), 372–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, K., Berry, K., & Jones, L. (2014). The relationships between psychological mindedness, parental bonding and adult attachment. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 87, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, I., & Munholland, K. A. (2008). Internal working models in attachment relationships: Elaborating a central construct in attachment theory. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 102–127). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Le Poire, B. A. (1999). Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: Participant and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality. Communication Monographs, 66, 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., Ziv, Y., Mehta, T. G., & Feeney, B. C. (2003). Feedback seeking in children and adolescents: Associations with self-perceptions, attachment representations, and depression. Child Development, 74, 612–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Allard, L. M. (2001). Cognitive representations of attachment: The content and function of working models. In G. J. O. Fletcher & M. Clark (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 60–85). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWolff, M., & van IJzendoorn, M. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68, 571–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, M. P., & Kiebach, C. (1974). A brief note on the validity of the comfortable interpersonal distance scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 94, 297–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, M.P., Nowicki, S. (1972). A new measure and social-learning model for interpersonal distance. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 119–32.

  • Fineberg, S. K., Leavitt, J., Landry, C. D., Neustadter, E. S., Lesser, R. E., Stahl, D. S., & Corlett, P. R. (2018). Individuals with borderline personality disorder show larger preferred social distance in live dyadic interactions. Psychiatry Research, 260, 384–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Niedenthal, P. M., Marks, M. J., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Vicary, A. (2006). Adult attachment and the perception of emotional expressions: Probing the hyperactivating strategies underlying anxious attachment. Journal of Personality, 74, 1163–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships-relationship structures questionnaire: A method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships. Psychological Assessment, 23, 615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Roisman, G. I., Booth-LaForce, C., Owen, M. T., & Holland, A. S. (2013). Interpersonal and genetic origins of adult attachment styles: A longitudinal study from infancy to early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch, Z. D. (1990). The embrace: On the element of non-distance in human relations. Sociological Quarterly, 31, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1963). A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 65, 1003–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. (1983). Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 293.

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, K., Raikkonen, K., Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L., & Strandberg, T. (2004). Adult attachment dimensions and recollections of childhood family context: Associations with dispositional optimism and pessimism. European Journal of Personality, 18, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, D., Lomore, C. D., Takacs, T. A., & Price, E. L. (2011). Adult attachment styles and stressor severity as moderators of the coping sequence. Personal Relationships, 18, 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M. J., Duff, D. F., & Stratton, L. O. (1964). Body-buffer zone: Exploration of personal space. Archives of General Psychiatry, 11(6), 651–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, S. M., & Ward, T. (1997). Intimacy, loneliness, and attachment style in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitz, M., Bar-Haim, Y., Lehrer, M., & Grossman, E. (2004). Adult attachment style and interpersonal distance. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layden, E. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2018). Loneliness predicts a preference for larger interpersonal distance within intimate space. PloS One, 13, e0203491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A., Rubinsten, O., Peled, L., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2013). Don’t stand so close to me: A behavioral and ERP study of preferred interpersonal distance. NeuroImage, 83, 761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A., Mankuta, D., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2014). OT promotes closer interpersonal distance among highly empathic individuals. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A., Nichiporuk, N., & Knight, R. T. (2016). Where does one stand: A biological account of preferred interpersonal distance. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(2), 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistole, M. C. (1994). Adult attachment styles: Some thoughts on closeness distance struggle. Family Process, 33, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponizovsky, A. M., Finkelstein, I., Poliakova, I., Mostovoy, D., Goldberger, N., & Rosca, P. (2013). Interpersonal distances, coping strategies and psychopathology in patients with depression and schizophrenia. World Journal of Psychiatry, 3(3), 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A. C., & Carnelley, K. B. (2005). Preliminary support for the use of a hierarchical mapping technique to examine attachment networks. Personal Relationships, 12, 499–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, M., Oshri, A., Eshkol, V., & Pilowsky, T. (2014). Adolescents’ ADHD symptoms and adjustment: The role of attachment and rejection sensitivity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamasundar, C. (1999). Understanding empathy and related phenomena. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 53, 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, S. S., MacDonald, G., Maxwell, J. A., Joel, S., Peragine, D., Muise, A., & Impett, E. A. (2013). Settling for less out of fear of being single. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1049–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, D., & Horne, N. (2006). The influence of biological sex, sexuality and gender role on interpersonal distance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 579–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veitch, R., Getsinger, A., & Arkkelin, D. (1976). A note on the reliability and validity of the comfortable interpersonal distance scale. The Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 163–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westmaas, J., & Silver, R. C. (2001). The role of attachment in responses to victims of life crises. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukawa, S., Tokuda, H., & Sato, J. (2007). Attachment style, self-concealment, and interpersonal distance among Japanese undergraduates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1255–1261, 10 104.

Download references

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

    Hamed Akbarian, Mohammad Ali Mazaheri & Abbas Zabihzadeh

  2. Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Jeffrey D. Green

Authors
  1. Hamed Akbarian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Ali Mazaheri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abbas Zabihzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeffrey D. Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamed Akbarian.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akbarian, H., Mazaheri, M.A., Zabihzadeh, A. et al. Attachment-related anxiety and avoidance and regulation of interpersonal distance in close relationships. Curr Psychol 41, 4638–4644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00939-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00939-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation