Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychometric evaluation of three versions of the Italian Perceived Stress Scale

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stress is measured through the use of tools that allow detection in large samples, and the search effort is directed to validating tools to ensure that they are predictable. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is one of the three most commonly used tools to measure perceived stress. The three versions of the PSS have never been evaluated for use with Italian workers. Therefore, the overall aims of this study are to translate and clarify the psychometric properties of the Italian versions, known as IPSS-14, IPSS-10, and IPSS-4 for use with Italian precarious workers. A sample of 649 precarious workers (mean age = 39.6, SD = 10.1) participated in this study, which consisted of 393 males and 256 females. The sample was randomly split into two for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to investigate the PSS structure. The two-factor models for the three Italian versions of PSS showed a better fit than the single-factor models. The reliability was high for IPSS-14 and IPSS-10. The results suggest that the psychometric properties of IPSS-10 are greater than those of IPSS-14 and IPSS-4. Therefore, IPSS-10 can be reliably used to measure perceived stress and is a suitable tool to incorporate the support/intervention programs for Italian precarious workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreou, E., Alexopoulos, E. C., Lionis, C., Varvogli, L., Gnardellis, C., Chrousos, G. P., & Darviri, C. (2011). Perceived stress scale: Reliability and validity study in Greece. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(8), 3287–3298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (version 7.0) [computer program]. Chicago: SpSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2006). CFA with equality constraints, multiple groups, and mean structures. In T. Brown (Ed.), Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (pp. 236–319). New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling: Perspectives on the present and the future. International Journal of Testing, 1(3–4), 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaaya, M., Osman, H., Naassan, G., & Mahfoud, Z. (2010). Validation of the Arabic version of the Cohen perceived stress scale (PSS-10) among pregnant and postpartum women. BMC Psychiatry, 10(1), 111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M., Lewchuk, W., de Wolff, A., & King, A. (2007). ‘This just isn't sustainable’: Precarious employment, stress and workers' health. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30(4), 311–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 31–67). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., Hepworth, S. J., Wall, T. D., & Warr, P. B. (1981). A compendium and review of 249 work review measures and their use. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, M., Bäckström, M., & Tuvesson, H. (2014). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Swedish version of the perceived stress scale. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 68(7), 494–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 930–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, W. C., Muntaner, C., Benach, J., Gimeno, D., & Benavides, F. G. (2007). A glossary for the social epidemiology of work organisation: Part 3, terms from the sociology of labour markets. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(1), 6–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, P. L., Flett, G. L., & Mosher, S. W. (1992). The perceived stress scale: Factor structure and relation to depression symptoms in a psychiatric sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14(3), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istat, S. (2017). Censimento popolazione Istat; 2016.

  • Kim, M. H., Kim, C. Y., Park, J. K., & Kawachi, I. (2008). Is precarious employment damaging to self-rated health? Results of propensity score matching methods, using longitudinal data in South Korea. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 1982–1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: A practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1994). Stress, appraising, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. H. (2012). Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nursing Research, 6(4), 121–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, F. X., Berjot, S., & Deschamps, F. (2012). Psychometric properties of the French versions of the perceived stress scale. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 25(2), 178–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, D. Y., Lam, T. H., & Chan, S. S. (2010). Three versions of perceived stress scale: Validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who smoke. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 513–520.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lombard, J. H. (2010). Depression, psychological stress, vascular dysfunction, and cardiovascular disease: Thinking outside the barrel. Journal of Applied Physiology, 108(5), 1025–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, C. D. B., Sanches, S. D. O., Mazo, G. Z., & Andrade, A. (2007). Brazilian version of the perceived stress scale: Translation and validation for the elderly. Revista de Saúde Pública, 41(4), 606–615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J., & Kaplan, G. (2000). Socioeconomic position. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 13–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimura, C., & Griffiths, P. (2004). A Japanese version of the perceived stress scale: Translation and preliminary test. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(4), 379–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscone, F., Tosetti, E., & Vittadini, G. (2016). The impact of precarious employment on mental health: The case of Italy. Social Science & Medicine, 158, 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

  • Paul, K. I., & Moser, K. (2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 264–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pbert, L., Doerfler, L. A., & DeCosimo, D. (1992). An evaluation of the perceived stress scale in two clinical populations. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14(4), 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H., Hansen, C. B., & Mahler, S. (2003). Temporary agency work in the European Union, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin, http://www.fr.eurofound.eu.int/pubdocs/2004/104/en/1/ef04104en. pdf.

  • Quinlan, M., Mayhew, C., & Bohle, P. (2001). The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: A review of recent research. International Journal of Health Services, 31(2), 335–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, A. B., Hernández, B. A. S., & Figueiras, S. C. (2007). Relación estructural entre apoyo familiar, nivel educativo de los padres, características del maestro y desempeño en lengua escrita. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 12(33), 701–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remor, E. (2006). Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the perceived stress scale (PSS). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberti, J. W., Harrington, L. N., & Storch, E. A. (2006). Further psychometric support for the 10-item version of the perceived stress scale. Journal of College Counseling, 9(2), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siqueira Reis, R., Ferreira Hino, A. A., & Romélio Rodriguez Añez, C. (2010). Perceived stress scale: Reliability and validity study in Brazil. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(1), 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosko, L. F. (2010). Managing the margins: Gender, citizenship, and the international regulation of precarious employment. Oxford University Press.

  • Wang, Z., Chen, J., Boyd, J. E., Zhang, H., Jia, X., Qiu, J., & Xiao, Z. (2011). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the perceived stress scale in policewomen. PLoS One, 6(12), e28610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wongpakaran, N., & Wongpakaran, T. (2010). The Thai version of the PSS-10: An investigation of its psychometric properties. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 4(1), 6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pedagogy Psychology Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Via is Mirrionis 1, 09123, Cagliari, Italy

    Marina Mondo, Cristina Sechi & Cristina Cabras

Authors
  1. Marina Mondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina Sechi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristina Cabras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Sechi.

Ethics declarations

Statement of Human Rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mondo, M., Sechi, C. & Cabras, C. Psychometric evaluation of three versions of the Italian Perceived Stress Scale. Curr Psychol 40, 1884–1892 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0132-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0132-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation