Abstract
Little attention has been given to whether country of origin as well as perceptions of severity impact adolescents’ attributions for public and private face-to-face and cyber victimization. The objective of the present study was to examine the role of medium (face-to-face, cyber), setting (public, private), and perceptions of severity in adolescents’ attributions for victimization, while accounting for gender and cultural values. Participants included 3,432 adolescents (ages 11–15; 49% girls) from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. Adolescents completed a questionnaire on their cultural values and read four hypothetical peer victimization scenarios, including public face-to-face victimization, private face-to-face victimization, public cyber victimization, and private cyber victimization. They rated the severity of each scenario and how likely they would use various attributions to explain the victimization scenarios, including self-blame, aggressor-blame, joking, normative, and conflict attributions. The findings revealed that attributions varied based on severity, and that this relationship was moderated by setting and medium of victimization, as well as varied by country of origin. Taken together, the results from this study indicate complex differences in attributions based on setting, medium, perceptions of severity, and country of origin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
14 January 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09668-7
References
Ang, R. P., & Goh, D. H. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-010-0176-3
Balaji, M. S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from ‘Media Richness Theory’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9, 1–22.
Bailey, C., & Ostrov, J. (2008). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: Associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9211-5
Boxer, P., & Tisak, M. (2003). Adolescents’ attributions about aggression: An initial investigation. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00056-3
Chen, X., & French, D. C. (2008). Children’s social competence in cultural context. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 591–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093606
Coie, J. D., & Pennington, B. F. (1976). Children’s perceptions of deviance and disorder. Child Development, 47, 407–413. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128795
Crystal, D. S. (2000). Concepts of deviance and disturbance in children and adolescents: A comparison between the United States and Japan. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590050171148
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.734
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
Garner, P. W., & Lemerise, E. A. (2007). The roles of behavioral adjustment and conceptions of peers and emotions in preschool children’s peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579407070046
Georgiou, S. N. (2005). Growing and learning in the Greek Cypriot family context. In A. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (pp. 121–141). Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science.
Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.3.587
Hara, H. (2002). Justifications for bullying among Japanese schoolchildren. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00104
Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00629
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2012). School climate 2.0: Preventing cyberbullying and sexting one classroom at a time. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42, 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9902-4
Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and application. Routledge.
Kawabata, Y., Crick, N. R., & Hamaguchi, Y. (2013). The association of relational and physical victimization with hostile attribution bias, emotional distress, and depressive symptoms: A cross-cultural study. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12030
Leung, A. N. M., Wong, N., & Farver, J. M. (2018). You are what you read: The belief systems of cyber-bystanders on social networking sites. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00365
Li, Y., Wang, M., Wang, C., & Shi, J. (2010). Individualism, collectivism, and Chinese adolescents’ aggression: Intracultural variations. Aggressive Behavior, 36(3), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20341
Mathieson, L. C., Murray-Close, D., Crick, N. R., Woods, K. E., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., & Morales, J. R. (2011). Hostile intent attributions and relational aggression: The moderating roles of emotional sensitivity, gender, and victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 977–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9515-5
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2004). Culture and psychology. Wadsworth.
Perren, S., Corcoran, L., Cowie, H., Dehue, F., Garcia, D. J., Mc Guckin, C., & Vollink, T. (2012). Tackling cyberbullying: Review of empirical evidence regarding successful responses by students, parents, and schools. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6(2), 283–292.
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336
Prinstein, M. J., Cheah, C. S. L., & Guyer, A. E. (2005). Peer victimization, cue interpretation, and internalizing symptoms: Preliminary concurrent and longitudinal findings for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_2
Ramirez, J., Andreu, J., & Fujihara, T. (2001). Cultural and sex differences in aggression: A comparison between Japanese and Spanish students using two different inventories. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.1014
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
Runions, K., Shapka, J., Dooley, J., & Modecki, K. (2013). Cyber-aggression and victimization and social information processing: Integrating the medium and the message. Psychology of Violence, 3, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030511
Salmivalli, C., Karna, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). Development, evaluation, and diffusion of a national antibullying program, KiVa. In B. Doll, W. Pfohl, & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 238–252). Routledge.
Shapka, J. (2012). Cyberbullying and bullying are not the same: UBC research. Retrieved on March 1, 2016 from: http://www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/2012/04/13/cyberbullying-and-bullying-are-not-the-same-ubc-research/
Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450-2007.00611.x
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
Smith, P. K., & Slonje, R. (2010). Cyberbullying: The nature and extent of a new kind of bullying, in and out of school. In S. S. Jimerson & D. Espelage (Eds.), The international handbook of school bullying (pp. 249–262). New York, NY: Routledge.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, & antecedents. University of Texas Press.
Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(5), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3
Suler, J. R. (2004). In class and online: Using discussion boards in teaching. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.395
Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Way, N., Hughes, D., Yoshikawa, H., Kalman, R. K., & Niwa, E. Y. (2008). Parents’ goals for children: The dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals. Social Development, 17, 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00419.x
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014
Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. W. (2005). Trajectories of peer victimization and perceptions of the self and schoolmates: Precursors to internalizing and externalizing problems. Child Development, 76, 1072–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00898.x
Verma, J. (2001). Situational preference for different types of individualism-collectivism. Psychology Developing Societies, 13, 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133360101300206
Viehmann, C., & Weber, M. (2018). Do I really need to help? Perceived severity of cyberbullying, victim blaming, and bystanders’ willingness to help the victim. CyberPsychology, 12(4), 4.
Wright, M. F. (2017). Adolescents’ emotional distress and attributions for face-to-face and cyber victimization: Longitudinal linkages to later aggression. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 48, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.11.002
Wright, M. F., Kamble, S., Aoyama, I., Lei, L., Li, Z., Sevcikova, A., Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., Cerna, A., & Shruti, S. (2017). Differences in attributions for public and private face-to-face and cyber victimization among adolescents in six countries. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2016.1185083
Wright, M. F., Li, Y., & Shi, J. (2014). Chinese adolescents’ social status goals: Associations with behaviors and attributions for relational aggression. Youth & Society, 46, 566–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118×12448800
Yeager, D. S., Miu, A., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2013). Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: A meta-analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal intervention. Child Development, 84, 1651–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12062
Yeh, K. (2011). Mediating effects of negative emotions in parent-child conflict on adolescent problem behavior. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2011.01350.x
Funding
This work was also partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Grant Number 26870535.
The authors have nothing to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wright, M.F., Wachs, S., Yanagida, T. et al. Associations between Severity and Attributions: Differences for Public and Private Face-to-face and Cyber Victimization. Am J Crim Just 46, 843–861 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09660-7