Abstract
Objective
To assess the diagnostic value of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization.
Methods
This prospective study was carried out in 22 patients (< 15 yr of age) of leprosy. Clinical examination of each case was done and skin smear for AFB was prepared. Biopsy of lesion site was taken for histopathological examination, in situ hybridization and PCR.
Results
The histopathological examination confirmed the clinical diagnosis in 27.2% cases only. In situ hybridization showed a positivity of 42.8% in early (I/BT) and 46.7% in BB/BL group. In situ hybridization thus enhanced the diagnosis by 18.1%. PCR targeting 36 kDa gene of M. leprae was performed on 15 cases. In these 15 cases, histopathology confirmed the diagnosis in 4 cases (26.6%) and PCR confirmed the diagnosis in 10 cases (66.6%), thus enhancing the diagnosis by 40%.
Conclusion
36 kDa PCR and in situ hybridization enhance the diagnosis of leprosy when compared to routine histopathology. They are important diagnostic tools for definitive diagnosis in early and doubtful cases of leprosy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dharmendra and Chatterjee SN. General consideration in Leprosy by Dharmendra; Vol. 1; Kothari Medical Publication House; 1978: 246.
Fine PEM, Job CK, and MC Dougall ACM. Comparability among histopathologists in the diagnosis and classification of lesions suspected of leprosy. Int J Lepr 1986; 61: 270–282.
Ramu G, Karthikeyan S, and Balakrishanan S. Histological and Immunological correlation of suspected leprosy patients. Indian J Lepr 1996; 68: 153.
Xiao Man Wang, Shu Yaan Chan, and Shun Peng Ran. Immunohistopathology in the diagnosis of early leprosy. Int J Lepr 2000; 68: 426–429.
Classification of Leprosy. Indian J Lepr 1982; 54: 22–25.
Hartskreel RA, Dewit MYL and Klatser PR. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of M leprae. J Gen Microbiol 1989; 135: 2357–2364.
Dayal R, Gupta R, Mathur PP, Dhir GG, Katoch VM and Katoch K. Study of gene probes in childhood leprosy. Ind J Paed 1997; 65: 99–105.
Dave MS and Agarwal SK. Prevalence of leprosy in children of Leprosy patients. Lepr India 1984; 56: 615–621.
Dayal R, Hashmi NA, Mathur PP and Prasad R. Leprosy in children. Indian Pediatr 1990; 27: 170–180.
Dayal R, Agrawal PK, Kalra K, Bhardwaj VP, Katoch VM and Katoch K. Diagnostic value of gene probes and its correlation with clinical profile of leprosy in Children. Indian Pediatr 1994; 31: 1521–1527.
Abalos RM. Indeterminate leprosy-a five years study. Histological observations. Int J Lepr 41: no. 4 (Supplement) Abstract 1973; 11/258.
Takahashi MD Andrade HF Jr Wakamstu A Siqueira S and be Birto T. Indeterminate leprosy: histopathologic and histochemical predictive parameters involved in its possible change to paucibacillary or multibacillary leprosy. Int J Lepr 1991; 59: 12–19.
Katoch VM. New Investigation technique in leprosy In: RG Valia and AR Valia, eds. Dermatology update, Mumbai, Bhalani Publishing House, India; 1998; 175–184.
Singh HB, Katoch VM, Natrajan M, Sharma VD, Chauhan DS, Lawania M et al. Improved protocol for PCR detection of Mycobacterium leprae. Int J Lepr 2004; 32: 175–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dayal, R., Agarwal, M., Natrajan, M. et al. PCR and in-situ hybridization for diagnosis of leprosy. Indian J Pediatr 74, 645–648 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0115-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0115-x