Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative genomic characterization of melanoma of known and unknown primary

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aims to genomically characterize melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) in comparison to melanomas of cutaneous primary (MCP).

Methods

Eligible cases were collected from the MSK-IMPACT™ Clinical Sequencing Cohort published in the cBioPortal database. Genomic analysis was performed using a hybridization-capture-based next-generation sequencing assay designed to detect mutations, small insertions and deletions, copy number alterations, and genomic rearrangements.

Results

Among 462 patients of whom 18.4% had MUP, brain metastasis was more common among patients with MUP (23% vs 7.1%). The differences in genomic profiling between MCP and MUP did not reach statistical significance. The 187 MCP and 44 MUP patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors had a median overall survival of 49 and 44 months, respectively (p = 0.705).

Conclusions

The differences in somatic mutation patterns and survival outcomes were not statistically significant. These findings may allude to similar carcinogenic processes but should be considered exploratory and interpreted with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are publically available on https://www.cbioportal.org/.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kamposioras K, Pentheroudakis G, Pectasides D, Pavlidis N. Malignant melanoma of unknown primary site. To make the long story short. A systematic review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;78:112–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee CC, Faries MB, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Improved survival for stage IV melanoma from an unknown primary site. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dasgupta T, Bowden L, Berg JW. Malignant melanoma of unknown primary origin. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;117:341–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rassy E, Pavlidis N. Progress in refining the clinical management of cancer of unknown primary in the molecular era. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:541–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rassy E, Assi T, Pavlidis N. Exploring the biological hallmarks of cancer of unknown primary: where do we stand today? Br J Cancer. 2020;122:1124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Verver D, van der Veldt A, van Akkooi A, Verhoef C, Grünhagen DJ, Louwman WJ. Treatment of melanoma of unknown primary in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapy: a Dutch population-based study. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:26–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gos A, Jurkowska M, van Akkooi A, Robert C, Kosela-Paterczyk H, Koljenović S, et al. Molecular characterization and patient outcome of melanoma nodal metastases and an unknown primary site. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4317–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, Syed A, Middha S, Kim HR, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23:703–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Samstein RM, Lee C-H, Shoushtari AN, Hellmann MD, Shen R, Janjigian YY, et al. Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types. Nat Genet. 2019;51:202–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng DT, Mitchell TN, Zehir A, Shah RH, Benayed R, Syed A, et al. Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): a hybridization capture-based next-generation sequencing clinical assay for solid tumor molecular oncology. J Mol Diagn JMD. 2015;17:251–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:401–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:pl1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabbie R, Ferguson P, Wong K, Couturier D-L, Moran U, Turner C, et al. The mutational landscape of melanoma brain metastases presenting as the first visceral site of recurrence. Br J Cancer. 2021;124:156–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang FW, Hodis E, Xu MJ, Kryukov GV, Chin L, Garraway LA. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science. 2013;339:957–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Horn S, Figl A, Rachakonda PS, Fischer C, Sucker A, Gast A, et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science. 2013;339:959–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiuru M, Busam KJ. The NF1 gene in tumor syndromes and melanoma. Lab Investig J Tech Methods Pathol. 2017;97:146–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cirenajwis H, Lauss M, Ekedahl H, Törngren T, Kvist A, Saal LH, et al. NF1-mutated melanoma tumors harbor distinct clinical and biological characteristics. Mol Oncol. 2017;11:438–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krauthammer M, Kong Y, Bacchiocchi A, Evans P, Pornputtapong N, Wu C, et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in NF1 and RASopathy genes in sun-exposed melanomas. Nat Genet. 2015;47:996–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hodis E, Watson IR, Kryukov GV, Arold ST, Imielinski M, Theurillat J-P, et al. A landscape of driver mutations in melanoma. Cell. 2012;150:251–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Whittaker SR, Theurillat J-P, Van Allen E, Wagle N, Hsiao J, Cowley GS, et al. A genome-scale RNA interference screen implicates NF1 loss in resistance to RAF inhibition. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:350–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson MA, Zhao F, Khare S, Roszik J, Woodman SE, D’Andrea K, et al. Copy number changes are associated with response to treatment with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in melanoma. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2016;22:374–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Flores JF, Walker GJ, Glendening JM, Haluska FG, Castresana JS, Rubio MP, et al. Loss of the p16INK4a and p15INK4b genes, as well as neighboring 9p21 markers, in sporadic melanoma. Cancer Res. 1996;56:5023–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haluska FG, Hodi FS. Molecular genetics of familial cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1998;16:670–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Greshock J, Nathanson K, Medina A, Ward MR, Herlyn M, Weber BL, et al. Distinct patterns of DNA copy number alterations associate with BRAF mutations in melanomas and melanoma derived cell lines. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2009;48:419–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Potrony M, Badenas C, Aguilera P, Puig-Butille JA, Carrera C, Malvehy J, et al. Update in genetic susceptibility in melanoma. Ann Transl Med [Internet]. 2015;3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583600/ [cited 2021 Jan 12].

  27. Bae JM, Choi YY, Kim DS, Lee JH, Jang HS, Lee JH, et al. Metastatic melanomas of unknown primary show better prognosis than those of known primary: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gambichler T, Chatzipantazi M, Schröter U, Stockfleth E, Gedik C. Patients with melanoma of unknown primary show better outcome under immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy than patients with known primary: preliminary results. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1677139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ellebaek E, Bastholt L, Schmidt H, Svane IM, Donia M. The real-world outcome of metastatic melanoma: unknown primary vs. known cutaneous. Int J Cancer. 2019;145:3173–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Boussios S, Rassy E, Samartzis E, Moschetta M, Sheriff M, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, et al. Melanoma of unknown primary: new perspectives for an old story. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020;158:103208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: ER and NP; data acquisition: ER and AC; data analysis and interpretation: ER, AC and SB; statistical analysis: ER; manuscript editing and critical review: SB, CF, JK, and NP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Rassy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

The data from the cBioPortal database do not require ethical approval.

Informed consent

The datasets are publically available. there was not any interactions with the patients who remain anyonymous on the cbioportal plateform.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rassy, E., Boussios, S., Chebly, A. et al. Comparative genomic characterization of melanoma of known and unknown primary. Clin Transl Oncol 23, 2302–2308 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02629-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-021-02629-2

Keywords

Navigation