Abstract
Purpose
To assess the pattern of treatment failure in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiotherapy (76–80 Gy) ± hormone therapy (HT). We also evaluated the influence of treatment failure on survival outcomes.
Methods
Retrospective study of patients with PCa (n = 302) treated with radiotherapy (RT) ± HT at our centre between November 1999 and July 2007. The mean patient age was 70.2 years (range 51–87). Distribution by NCCN risk group was low (n = 80, 26.5%), intermediate (n = 86, 28.5%), high (n = 77, 25.5%), and very high (n = 49, 16.2%). Most patients (n = 273, 90.4%) received IMRT at a dose of 76–80 Gy. HT was administered in 237 patients (78.5%), in most cases (n = 167, 55.3%) for < 7 months
Results
Survival rates at 10 years were: overall survival (OS), 64.3%; biochemical disease-free survival, 83.9%; disease-free survival, 92.5%; and metastasis-free survival (MFS), 94.3%. Biochemical failure (BF) was observed in 55 cases (18.2%), 32 of whom subsequently developed clinical recurrence: metastasis (n = 17, 5.6%), local failure (n = 11, 3.6%), and regional failure (n = 4, 1.3%). The cause of death (n = 159) was intercurrent disease in 115 cases (72.3%), second cancer in 27 (17.0%), and PCa in 17 (10.7%). Biochemical failure-free survival ≤ 24 months was significantly associated with worse OS and MFS (p = 0.0001). Late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity grade ≥ 3 (RTOG) was observed in 18 (6.0%) and 7 (2.3%) patients, respectively.
Conclusions
The main type of treatment failure after 76–80 Gy of radiotherapy ± HT is local or metastatic. In all cases, biochemical failure occurred prior to treatment failure. BF within 24 months of treatment completion was significantly associated with worse OS and MFS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hanks GE, Martz KL, Diamond JJ. The effect of dose on local control of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988;15(6):1299–305.
Perez CA, Michalski JM, Mansur D, Lockett MA. Three-dimensional conformal therapy versus standard radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of prostate: an update. Clin Prostate Cancer. 2002;1(2):97–104. https://doi.org/10.3816/CGC.2002.n.011.
Alonso-Arrizabalaga S, Brualla González L, Roselló Ferrando JV, Pastor Peidro J, López Torrecilla J, Planes Meseguer D, et al. Prostate planning treatment volume margin calculation based on the ExacTrac X-Ray 6D image-guided system: margins for various clinical implementations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69(3):936–43.
Lee RJ, Armstrong AJ, Victor AD, Davis BJ, Dorff T, Eastham JA, et al; NCCN Guidelines Panel Disclosures. Patient advocate NCCN guidelines version 2.2018. Prostate Cancer. 2019. https://www2.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/urological/english/prostate.pdf.
Juan-Escudero JU, Pastor-Peidro J, Ramos-de-Campos M, Lopez-Torrecilla J, Lopez-Alcina E, Navalon-Verdejo P, et al. Insertion of intraprostate gold fiducial markers in prostate cancer treatment. Int J Nephrol Urol. 2010;2(1):265–72.
Cox JD, Stetz JA, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(5):1341–6.
NCI, NIH D. Common terminology criteria for adverse events v4.0. NIH Publ [Internet]. 2009;0–71. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf.
Garg AK, Mai WY, McGary JE, Grant WH, Butler EB, Teh BS. Radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(5):1294–305.
Briganti A, Spahn M, Joniau S, Gontero P, Bianchi M, Kneitz B, et al. Impact of age and comorbidities on long-term survival of patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional competing-risks analysis. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):693–701.
Marshall RA, Buckstein M, Stone NN, Stock R. Treatment outcomes and morbidity following definitive brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 20-year experience at Mount Sinai Medical Center. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2014;32(1):38.e1–.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.03.004.
Lee BH, Kibel AS, Ciezki JP, Klein EA, Reddy CA, Yu C, et al. Are biochemical recurrence outcomes similar after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy? Analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality by nomogram-predicted risks of biochemical recurrence. Eur Urol. 2015;67(2):204–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.017.
Xie W, Regan MM, Buyse M, Halabi S, Kantoff P, Sartor O, et al. Metastasis-free survival is a strong Surrogate of overall survival in localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(27):3097–104.
González-San Segundo C, Jové J, Zapatero A, Pastor-Peidro J, Vázquez ML, Casaña M, et al. Survival after biochemical failure in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy: Spanish Registry of Prostate Cancer (RECAP) database outcomes. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21(8):1044–51.
Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. J Am Med Assoc. 1999;281(17):1591–7.
Zumsteg ZS, Spratt DE, Romesser PB, Pei X, Zhang Z, Kollmeier M, et al. Anatomical patterns of recurrence following biochemical relapse in the dose escalation era of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2015;194(6):1624–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.100.
Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, Warde P, Dubois JB, Mirimanoff RO, et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9327):103–8.
Bolla M, Maingon P, Carrie C, Villa S, Kitsios P, Poortmans PMP, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation for intermediate-and high-risk localized prostate cancer: results of EORTC trial 22991. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15):1748–56.
Zelefsky MJ, Yamada Y, Fuks Z, Zhang Z, Hunt M, Cahlon O, et al. Long-term results of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: impact of dose escalation on biochemical tumor control and distant metastases-free survival outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(4):1028–33.
Alicikus ZA, Yamada Y, Zhang Z, Pei X, Hunt M, Kollmeier M, et al. Ten-year outcomes of high-dose, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(7):1429–37.
Michalski JM, Bae K, Roach M, Markoe AM, Sandler HM, Ryu J, et al. Long-term toxicity following 3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer from the RTOG 9406 phase I/II dose escalation study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(1):14–22.
Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, Rossi CJ, Miller DW, Adams JASW. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcima of the prostate A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294(10):1233–9.
Tsang YM, Hoskin P. The impact of bladder preparation protocols on post treatment toxicity in radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer patients. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2017;3–4:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.10.001.
Matta R, Chapple CR, Fisch M, Heidenreich A, Herschorn S, Kodama RT, et al. Pelvic complications after prostate cancer radiation therapy and their management: an international collaborative narrative review (figure presented). Eur Urol. 2019;75(3):464–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.003.
Acknowledgements
We thank Begoña Bordería, Jorge Buedo, Carmen Calatayud, Patricia Calatayud, Rafael Iñigo, Laura Leon, Laura Parreño, Frances Perruca, Patricia Prats, Patricia Martinez, Maria Muñoz, Rocio Sandoval, Elena Santos y Ana Serrano for their contribution to the treatment and monitoring of these patients, without their enthusiastic dedication to this work, it would not have been possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Any actual or potential conflicts of interest do not exist. The authors have no financial and personal relationship with other persons or organizations that could inappropriately influence their work.
Ethical approval
There are no details in the manuscript that could reveal the identity of the study subjects.
Informed consent
All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Torrecilla, J., Pastor-Peidro, J., Vicedo-González, A. et al. Patterns of treatment failure in patients with prostate cancer treated with 76–80 Gy radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles ± hormonotherapy. Clin Transl Oncol 23, 481–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02437-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02437-0