Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: data from the AGAMENON registry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer is unknown. Diverse clinical trials have proposed different strategies including limited treatment, maintenance of some drugs, or treatment until progression.

Method

The sample comprises patients from the AGAMENON multicenter registry without progression after second evaluation of response. The objective was to explore the optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy. A frailty multi-state model was conducted.

Results

415 patients were divided into three strata: discontinuation of platinum and maintenance with fluoropyrimidine until progression (30%, n = 123), complete treatment withdrawal prior to progression (52%, n = 216), and full treatment until progression (18%, n = 76). The hazard of tumor progression decreased by 19% per month with the full treatment regimen. However, we found no evidence that fluoropyrimidine maintenance (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, confidence interval [CI] 95%, 0.69–1.65) worsened progression-free survival (PFS) with respect to treatment until progression. Predictive factors for PFS were ECOG performance status, ≥ 3 metastatic sites, prior tumor response, and bone metastases. Toxicity grade 3/4 was more common in those who continued the full treatment until progression vs fluoropyrimidine maintenance (16% vs 6%).

Conclusion

The longer duration of the full initial regimen exerted a protective effect on the patients of this registry. Platinum discontinuation followed by fluoropyrimidine maintenance yields comparable efficacy to treatment up to PD, with a lower rate of serious adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wagner AD, Syn NLX, Moehler M, Grothe W, Yong WP, Tai B, et al. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Libr. 2017;8:CD004064. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ter Veer E, Haj Mohammad N, van Valkenhoef G, Ngai LL, Mali RMA, Anderegg MC, et al. The efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy in advanced esophagogastric cancer: a network meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryu M-H, Yoo C, Kim JG, Ryoo B-Y, Park YS, Park SR, et al. Multicenter phase II study of trastuzumab in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:482–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4991–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guimbaud R, Louvet C, Ries P, Ychou M, Maillard E, André T, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive, Fed. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3520–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuchs CS, Shitara K, Di Bartolomeo M, Lonardi S, Al-Batran S-E, Van Cutsem E, et al. RAINFALL: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of cisplatin (Cis) plus capecitabine (Cape) or 5FU with or without ramucirumab (RAM) as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G-GEJ) ad 2018. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:420–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30791-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E, Rha SY, Sawaki A, Park SR, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3968–76. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.2236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa073149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eren OO, Ozturk MA, Sonmez OU, Oyan B. Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of capecitabine maintenance in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Am J Ther. 2016;23:e1493–e14971497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qiu M, Wei X, Zhang D, Jin Y, Zhou Y, Wang D, et al. Efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy using oxaliplatin and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective observation. Tumor Biol. 2014;35:4369–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Palacio S, Loaiza-Bonilla A, Kittaneh M, Kyriakopoulos C, Ochoa RE, Escobar M, et al. Successful use of Trastuzumab with anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab maintenance in patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:301–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meulendijks D, De Groot JWB, Los M, Boers JE, Beerepoot LV, Polee MB, et al. Bevacizumab combined with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine, followed by maintenance with capecitabine and bevacizumab, as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer: a multicenter phase 2 study. Cancer. 2016;122:1434–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ajani JA, Buyse M, Lichinitser M, Gorbunova V, Bodoky G, Douillard JY, et al. Combination of cisplatin/S-1 in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: results of noninferiority and safety analyses compared with cisplatin/5-fluorouracil in the First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Study. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:3616–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Randomized Phase 3 Study of Xelox(Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin) Followed by Maintenance Capecitabine or Observation in Patients With Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma—NCT02289547. ClinicaltrialsGov 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02289547. Accessed 11 Mar 2018.

  17. Li W, Zhao X, Wang H, Liu X, Zhao X, Huang M, et al. Maintenance treatment of Uracil and Tegafur (UFT) in responders following first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomized phase II study. Oncotarget. 2017;8:37826.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao L, Wang J, Li H, Che J, Cao B. Meta-analysis comparing maintenance strategies with continuous therapy and complete chemotherapy-free interval strategies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:33418.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Muss HB, Case LD, Richards F, White DR, Cooper MR, Cruz JM, et al. Interrupted versus continuous chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1342–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SR, Kim M-J, Nam B-H, Kim CG, Lee JY, Cho S-J, et al. A randomised phase II study of continuous versus stop-and-go S-1 plus oxaliplatin following disease stabilisation in first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017;83:32–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v38–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. NCCN. NCCN clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer 2017. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2018.

  23. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Custodio A, Sánchez Cánovas M, Hernández R, Pericay C, et al. Anthracycline-based triplets do not improve the efficacy of platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublets in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: real-world data from the AGAMENON National Cancer Registry. Gastric Cancer. 2017;14:1379–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0718-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Lorenzo MLS, Ramchandani A, Martínez EA, Custodio A, et al. On the effect of triplet or doublet chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: results from a national cancer registry. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2016;14:1379–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiménez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Lorenzo MLS, Plazas JG, Custodio A, Hernández R, et al. Prognostic significance of performing universal HER2 testing in cases of advanced gastric cancer. Gastr Cancer. 2016;20:465–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Custodio A, Carmona-Bayonas A, Fonseca PJ, Sánchez ML, Antonio Viudez R, Hernández JM, et al. Nomogram-based prediction of survival in patients with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma receiving first-line chemotherapy: a multicenter prospective study in the era of trastuzumab. Br J Cancer. 2017;116:1526–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiménez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Hernández R, Custodio A, Cano JM, Lacalle A, et al. Lauren subtypes of advanced gastric cancer influence survival and response to chemotherapy: real-world data from the AGAMENON National Cancer Registry. Br J Cancer. 2017;117:775–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Visa L, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Martínez EA, Hernández R, Custodio A, Garrido M, et al. Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in older versus non-older patients with advanced gastric cancer: a real-world data, non-inferiority analysis. J Geriatr Oncol. 2017;9:254–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2017.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Echavarria I, Cánovas MS, Aguado G, Gallego J, et al. Surgery for metastases for esophageal-gastric cancer in the real world: data from the AGAMENON national registry. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1191–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, Rusch V, Jaques D, Budach V, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;13:176–81 (Elsevier).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med. 2007;26:2389–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Wreede LC, Fiocco M, Putter H. The mstate package for estimation and prediction in non-and semi-parametric multi-state and competing risks models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010;99:261–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Therneau TM, Lumley T. Package ‘survival’ 2016. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/survival.pdf

  34. Allignol A, Schumacher M, Beyersmann J. Empirical transition matrix of multi-state models: the etm package. J Stat Softw. 2011;38:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Therneau T. Mixed effects Cox models. CRAN Repos 2015. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/coxme/vignettes/coxme.pdf.

  36. Park SH, Lee J, Lee SH, Park JO, Kim K, Kim WS, et al. Anemia is the strongest prognostic factor for outcomes of 5-fluorouracil-based first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006;57:91–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Priscilla Chase Duran for editing the manuscript. Natalia Cateriano, Miguel Vaquero, and IRICOM S.A. for supporting the registry website. Carlos Gómez Martin. Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid. Federico Longo Muñoz. Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid. Pilar García Alfonso. Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid. Javier Sastre Varela. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid. Juan Carlos Cámara. Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid. Marisa Alsina Maqueda. Hospital Universitario Val d'Hebron, Barcelona. Marta Martín Richard. Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona. Carles Pericay Pijaume. Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli, Sabadell. Mª Angeles Vicente. Hospital Morales Meseguer de Murcia, Murcia. Miguel Marin Vera. Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia. Paola Pimentel Cáceres. Hospital Universitario Santa Lucia, Cartagena. Teresa García García. Hospital Universitario Santa Lucia, Cartagena. Raquel Hernández San Gil. Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife. Carolina Hernández. Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife. Ana Fernandez Montes. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Orense. Nieves Martínez Lago. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Coruña. Carlos López. Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander. Josefa Ferreiro Quintana. Hospital Galdakao‐Usansolo, Galdakao‐Usansolo. Roberto Pazo Cid. Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza. Aitziber Gil‐Negrete Laborda. Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Viúdez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and subsequent versions.

Informed consent

Informed consent or a substitute for it was obtained from all patients before they were included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Members of “the AGAMENON Study Group” are listed in acknowledgement section.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3, 4 and 5. See Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Viúdez, A., Carmona-Bayonas, A., Gallego, J. et al. Optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: data from the AGAMENON registry. Clin Transl Oncol 22, 734–750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02183-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02183-y

Keywords

Navigation