Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcomes to pemetrexed-based versus non-pemetrexed-based platinum doublets in patients with KRAS-mutant advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

KRAS mutation has been associated with enhanced dependency on the folate metabolism in preclinical studies. However, whether KRAS mutation correlates to increased sensitivity to pemetrexed in patients with advanced NSCLC is unknown.

Methods

Patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who had a documented EGFR and ALK WT genotype with simultaneous KRAS mutation assessment were evaluated for clinical outcome to pemetrexed- and non-pemetrexed-based first-line platinum doublet according to KRAS mutation status.

Results

Of 356 patients identified, 138 harbored a KRAS mutation. Among KRAS-mutant NSCLCs, those treated with platinum/pemetrexed (81/138) had significantly lower ORR (30.9% versus 47.4%, P = 0.05), DCR (51.8% versus 71.9%, P = 0.02) and shorter median progression-free survival [mPFS 4.1 versus 7.1 months, HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.03–2.12), P = 0.03] and median overall survival [mOS 9.7 versus 26.9 months, HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.27–2.94), P = 0.002] compared to those who received a non-pemetrexed-based platinum doublet (57/138). No difference in ORR, DCR, mPFS and mOS was observed between KRAS WT patients who received a pemetrexed-based (124/218) versus non-pemetrexed base platinum doublets (94/218). After adjusting for performance status, age and the presence of brain metastasis at baseline, treatment with pemetrexed-based platinum doublet was associated with an increased risk of death [HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.12–4.63), P = 0.02] among KRAS-mutant patients in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Patients with KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma have a poorer outcome on pemetrexed-based first-line chemotherapy. Whether KRAS-mutant NSCLCs should be excluded from pemetrexed-containing regimens should be assessed prospectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(3):169–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Mino-Kenudson M, et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(26):4247–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, Takada S, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448(7153):561–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergethon K, Shaw AT, Ou SI, et al. ROS1 rearrangements define a unique molecular class of lung cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(8):863–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ricciuti B, Leonardi GC, Metro G, et al. Targeting the KRAS variant for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: potential therapeutic applications. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(1):53–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Metro G, Chiari R, Duranti S, et al. Impact of specific mutant KRAS on clinical outcome of EGFR-TKI-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with an EGFR wild type genotype. Lung Cancer. 2012;78(1):81–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mao C, Qiu LX, Liao RY, FB et al. KRAS mutations and resistance to EGFR-TKIs treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 22 studies. Lung Cancer. 2012;69(3):272–8.

  8. Mascaux C, Iannino N, Martin B, et al. The role of RAS oncogene in survival of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(1):131–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson ML, Sima CS, Chaft J, et al. Association of KRAS and EGFR mutations with survival in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer. 2013;119(2):356–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barlesi F, Mazieres J, Merlio JP, et al. Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT). Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1415–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan W, Yang Y, Zhu H, et al. KRAS mutation is a weak, but valid predictor for poor prognosis and treatment outcomes in NSCLC: a meta-analysis of 41 studies. Oncotarget. 2016;7(7):8373–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jänne PA, Shaw AT, Pereira JR, et al. Selumetinib plus docetaxel for KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jänne PA, Van Den Heuvel MM, Barlesi F, et al. Selumetinib plus docetaxel compared with docetaxel alone and progression-free survival in patients with KRAS-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the SELECT-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(18):1844–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Scagliotti GV, Parikh P, Von Pawel J, et al. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3543–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(9):1589–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moran DM, Trusk PB, Pry K, et al. KRAS mutation status is associated with enhanced dependency on folate metabolism pathways in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(6):1611–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SH, Noh KB, Lee JS, et al. Thymidylate synthase and ERCC1 as predictive markers in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma treated with pemetrexed and cisplatin. Lung Cancer. 2013;81(1):102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chamizo C, Zazo S, Dómine M, et al. Thymidylate synthase expression as a predictive biomarker of pemetrexed sensitivity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grønberg BH, Lund-Iversen M, Strøm EH, et al. Associations between TS, TTF-1, FR-α, FPGS, and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving pemetrexed plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy.J Thorac Oncol. 2013; 8(10):1255–64.

  20. Ludovini V, Ricciuti B, Tofanetti F, et al. KRAS mutation and DNA repair and synthesis genes in non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2018;9(6):689–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Fang W, Yan Y, et al. The efficacy of first-line chemotherapy is associated with KRAS mutation status in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Med Oncol. 2015;32(3):61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Metro G, Chiari R, C. Bennati C, et al. Clinical outcome with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous EGFR wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer segregated according to kras mutation status. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014;15(1):86–92.

  23. Hames ML, Chen H, Iams W, et al. Correlation between KRAS mutation status and response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2016;92:29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garassino MC, Marabese M, Rusconi P, et al. Different types of K-Ras mutations could affect drug sensitivity and tumour behaviour in non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(1):235–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mellema WW, Masen-Poos L, Smit EF, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in different types of KRAS mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2015;90(2):249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Park S, Kim JY, Lee SH, et al. KRAS G12C mutation as a poor prognostic marker of pemetrexed treatment in non-small cell lung cancer. Korean J Intern Med. 2017;32(3):514–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Renaud S, Guerrera F, Seitlinger J, et al. KRAS-specific amino acid substitutions are associated with different responses to chemotherapy in advanced non–small cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19(6):e919–e931931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2078–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2288–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for pd-l1–positive non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fakih M, O'Neil B, Price TJ et al. Phase 1 study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of AMG 510, a novel small molecule KRASG12C inhibitor, in advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 37(15_Suppl):3003–3003.

  32. Calles A, Sholl LM, Rodig SJ, et al. Immunohistochemical loss of LKB1 is a biomarker for more aggressive biology in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(12):2851–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Skoulidis F, Goldberg ME, Greenawalt DM, et al. STK11/LKB1 mutations and PD-1 inhibitor resistance in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(7):822–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca contro il Cancro (AIRC), No. 15713 AIRC 2014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Ricciuti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Comitato Etico Aziende Sanitarie (CEAS) Umbria approved the study (Approval Number: 4796/15/AV, 22 Jan 2015) to be conducted at Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, AOU of Perugia, Perugia, Italy (Deliberation Number: 1188, 9 Jul 2015). This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Comitato Etico Aziende Sanitarie (CEAS) Umbria approved the study (Approval Number: 4796/15/AV 22 Jan 2015).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ricciuti, B., Brambilla, M., Cortellini, A. et al. Clinical outcomes to pemetrexed-based versus non-pemetrexed-based platinum doublets in patients with KRAS-mutant advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 22, 708–716 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02175-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02175-y

Keywords

Navigation