Skip to main content
Log in

Does gender matter in glioblastoma?

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The clinical outcome of glioblastoma (GBM) patients who receive radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy is well established. However, little is known about how many patients do not receive this treatment. We consider it is important to investigate why a proportion of operated patients do not receive further treatment after surgery.

Methods

We reviewed all consecutive GBM patients operated on in our hospital between January 2000 and December 2008.

Results

A total of 216 patients with GBM were identified. Fifty-five (25%) did not receive any treatment after surgery. Univariate analysis showed that factors associated with no further treatment after surgery were older than 60 years (p=0.002), of female gender (p=0.03), had a KPS<70 (p<0.001) and had had a biopsy (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that age ≥60 years and KPS <70 were independent predictors of no further treatment after surgery. Gender was not an independent variable. However, women in the whole series were older than 60 years (p=0.01), and they had a worse KPS (p=0.02) and more biopsies (p=0.04) than men. In the whole group, median survival time was 10.4 months for men (n=125) vs. 7.2 months for women (n=91), log rank p<0.04. This difference was not observed in the group that was treated after surgery.

Conclusions

One out of four patients could not be treated after surgery. Independent predictors were older age and low KPS. These poor risk variables were more frequent in women and their survival was therefore lower than men in our series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352: 987–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B et al (2004) Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res 64:6892–6899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Paszat L, Laperriere N, Groome P et al (2001) A population-based study of glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:100–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Winger MJ, Macdonald DR, Cairncross JG (1989) Supratentorial anaplastic gliomas in adults. The prognostic importance of extent of resection and prior low-grade glioma. J Neurosurg 71:487–493

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, Scheithauer BW et al (2002) World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 61: 215–225

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang SM, Barker FG 2nd (2005) Marital status, treatment, and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a population based study. Cancer 104:1975–1984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weller M, Felsberg J, Hartmann C et al (2009) Molecular predictors of progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a prospective translational study of the German Glioma Network. J Clin Oncol 27: 5743–5750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Filippini G, Falcone C, Boiardi A et al (2008) Prognostic factors for survival in 676 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 10:79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang SM, Parney IF, Huang W et al (2005) Glioma Outcomes Project Investigators. Patterns of care for adults with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. JAMA 293:557–564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caloglu M, Yurut-Caloglu V, Karagol H et al (2009) Prognostic factors other than the performance status and age for glioblastoma multiforme. A singleinstitutional experience. J BUON 14:211–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reavey-Cantwell JF, Haroun RI, Zahurak M et al (2001) The prognostic value of tumor markers in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: analysis of 32 patients and review of the literature. J Neurooncol 55:195–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brockmann MA, Giese A, Mueller K et al (2007) Preoperative thrombocytosis predicts poor survival in patients with glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 9:335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugènia Verger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verger, E., Valduvieco, I., Caral, L. et al. Does gender matter in glioblastoma?. Clin Transl Oncol 13, 737–741 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0725-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0725-7

Keywords

Navigation