Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethics in Science

  • Opinion Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethics are a set of moral principles and values a civilized society follows. Doing science with principles of ethics is the bedrock of scientific activity. The society trusts that the results and the projected outcome of any scientific activity is based on an honest and conscientious attempt by the scientific community. However, during the last few decades, there has been an explosion of knowledge and the advent of digital age. We can access the publications of competitors with just a “click”. The evaluation parameters have evolved a lot and are based on impact factors, h-index and citations. There is a general feeling that the scientific community is under a lot of pressure for fulfilling the criteria for upward growth and even retention of the positions held. The noble profession of scientific research and academics has been marred by the temptation to falsify and fabricate data, plagiarism and other unethical practices. Broadly speaking, the breach of ethics involves: plagiarism, falsification of data, redundant (duplicate) publication, drawing far-fetched conclusions without hard data, for early publicity, gift authorship (receiving as well as giving), not giving sufficient attention and consideration to scholars and post-docs as per the norms, self promotion at the cost of team-members, treating colleagues (overall all juniors) in a feudal way and Machiavellianism (cunningness and duplicity in general conduct and push to positions of power and pelf). Misconduct in Indian academics and science is also under a lot of focus. It is important and urgent that science, engineering, and health departments and institutions in our country have in place systems for education and training in pursuit of science with ethics by sound and professional courses in Responsible Conduct of Research. All research and academic institution must have the Office of Ethics for information, guidelines, training and professional oversight of conduct of research with the ethos and ethics of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Resnik DB (2011) What is ethics in research and why is it important? http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/

  2. On being a scientist. A guide to responsible conduct in research. Third Edition (2009) graduateschool.nd.edu/assets/21763/on_being_a_scientist.pdf

  3. Steneck NH (2007) Office of research integrity—introduction to responsible conduct of research. Department of Health and Human Services, USA. http://ori.hhs.gov/ori-intro

  4. Sumner JB (1946) The chemical nature of enzymes. Nobel Prize Lecture. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1946/sumner-lecture.html

  5. Chemistry explained. James Sumner, American Biochemist. http://www.chemistryexplained.com/St-Te/Sumner-James.html

  6. Watson JD (2001) The double helix: a personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma OP (2012) Quality indicators of scientific research. Indian J Microbiol 52:305–306. doi:10.1007/s12088-012-0246-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pendlebury DA (2008) White paper—using bibliometrics in evaluating research. wokinfo.com/media/mtrp/UsingBibliometricsinEval_WP.pdf

  9. Publish and perish at Imperial College London: the death of Stefan Grimm (2014) http://www.dcscience.net/2014/12/01/publish-and-perish-at-imperial-college-london-the-death-of-stefan-grimm/

  10. Al-Khalili J (2010) Higgs would not find his boson in today’s ‘publish or perish’ research culture. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/14/higgs-boson-publish-or-perish-science-culture

  11. Zimmer C (2012) A sharp rise in retractions prompts calls for reform. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-retractions-prompts-calls-for-reform.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

  12. Fang FC, Casadevall A, Morrison RP (2011) Retracted science and the retraction index. Infect Immun 79:3855–3859. doi:10.1128/IAI.05661-11

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker L (2014) Is pressure to publish causing scientific fraud? http://thebrainbank.scienceblog.com/2014/04/11/is-pressure-to-publish-causing-scientific-fraud/

  14. Counzin-Frankel J (2013) Shaking up science. Science 339:386–389. doi:10.1126/science.339.6118.386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maher B (2010) Research integrity: Sabotage! Nature 467:516–518. doi:10.1038/467516a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Committee on Publication Ethics. http://publicationethics.org/

  17. Albert T, Wager E (2003) How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers. COPE report 2003. publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12.pdf

  18. Alberts B (2010) Promoting scientific standards. Science 327:12. doi:10.1126/science.1185983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Editorial—Mentoring matters (2010) Nature Cell Biol 12:101. doi:10.1038/ncb0210-101

  20. Lee A, Dennis C, Campbell P (2007) Nature’s guide for mentors. Nature 447:791–797. doi:10.1038/447791a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Titus SL, Wells JA, Rhoades LJ (2008) Repairing research integrity. Nature 453:980–982. doi:10.1038/453980a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelland K (2012) UK survey finds science misconduct “alive and well”. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/12/us-scientists-research-survey-idUSTRE80B1DN20120112

  23. Woodgett J (2012) We must be open about our mistakes. Nature 489:7. doi:10.1038/489007a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singapore statement on research integrity (2010) http://www.singaporestatement.org/

  25. Fanelli D (2013) Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting. Nature 494:149. doi:10.1038/494149a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Challenges in irreproducible research (2014) Nature 515:7. doi:10.1038/515007a

  27. Announcement: reducing our irreproducibility (2013) Nature 496:398. doi:10.1038/496398a

  28. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/rcr.jsp

  29. Innovation and growth—rationale for innovation strategy. Organization for Economic Co-operation and development (2007) www.oecd.org/science/inno/39374789.pdf

  30. Satyanarayana K (2010) Plagiarism: a scourge afflicting the Indian science. Indian J Med Res 131:373–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chaddah P (2014) Pursuing knowledge creation, India needs a policy on ‘plagiarism cells’. Curr Sci 106:349

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abinandanan TA (2011) Scientific misconduct in India: an analysis of retracted papers in PubMed. http://www.imsc.res.in/~ethicsmeet/abstracts/abinandanan.html

  33. Jayaraman K (2008) Chemistry’s ‘colossal’ fraud. http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/March/25030801.asp

  34. Neelankantan S (2009) In India, plagiarism on the rise. http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/india/090921/did-you-write-yaar-india-plagiarism-the-rise

  35. India to propose regulatory body to curb misconduct. Nature News in Brief (2008) Nature 452:15

  36. Turnitin. http://turnitin.com/

  37. Office of Research Ethics. https://uwaterloo.ca/research/office-research-ethics

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Om P. Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, O.P. Ethics in Science. Indian J Microbiol 55, 341–344 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0532-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0532-x

Keywords

Navigation