Skip to main content
Log in

An Analysis of the VELNEZ Nasal Pack’s Acceptability and Safety for Use During Nasal Surgery: A Prospective Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary function of nasal packs is to modulate the bleeding, prevent adhesions and obstruction, with least discomfort to the subjects without risking secondary infection. However, both packing and removal of the pack is an unpleasant experience, with the latter being extremely painful. Therefore the need of the hour is a dressing which prioritizes subject comfort without compromising other desired nasal pack properties. Twenty subjects were enrolled in this interventional, open label study. The subjects had 10 hospital visits, starting from baseline (Visit 1) to postoperative day 28 (Visit 10), at regular intervals. The proportion of the population with postoperative pain alleviation and bleeding control failure (within 10 min) were the main objectives. Within 10 min of VELNEZ administration, all 20 participants got their bleeding under control. With VELNEZ, the painful nasal pack removal method was totally avoided because it was biodegradable. No moderate/severe pain, infection and adhesions were reported in any of the subjects, but few subjects reported moderate obstruction until Visit 3 (Discharge Day). In the present study, for participants undergoing nasal surgery, VELNEZ proved to be a secure and reliable nasal pack.

Trial Registration: CTRI/2021/09/036437, prospectively registered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joshi RR, Nepal A, Chhetri ST, Bhandary S, Panta TB, Regmi D (2012) An evaluation of merocel and neosporin impregnated ribbon gauze packs in patients following nasal surgery: a prospective randomised trial. Health Renaiss 10(1):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Manea C, Sabaru I, Sanda C (2011) Nasal packing in endonasal surgery-a literature review. Rom J Rhinol 1(4):210–214

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YS, Kim YH, Kim NH, Kim SH, Kim KR, Kim KS (2011) A prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial on biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam as a packing material after septoplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25(2):e77–e79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kameswaran M, Raghunandhan S, Thomas JK (2014) A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of a novel biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (Nasopore) vs standard polyvinyl acetate sponge (Merocel) as packing material after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: the first Indian experience. Int J Clin Rhinol 7(3):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mane RS, Patil B, Mohite A (2013) Comparison of septoplasty with and without nasal packing and review of literature. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65:406–408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Basha SI, Gupta D, Kaluskar SK (2005) Routine nasal packing follwoing nasal surgery—Is it necessary? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 57:69–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Rosenbaum AE, Johns ME (1985) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: theory and diagnostic evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol 111(9):576–582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iqbal IZ, Jones GH, Dawe N, Mamais C, Smith ME, Williams RJ, Kuhn I, Carrie S (2017) Intranasal packs and haemostatic agents for the management of adult epistaxis: systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 131(12):1065–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehan R, Varghese L, Kurien R, Jeyaseelan V, Rupa V (2018) Is nasal packing essential after functional endoscopic sinus surgery? A randomized, controlled trial. Int J Clin Rhinol 10(3):113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ivanova PP, Iliev G (2023) Nasal packing in septal surgery: a narrative review. Cureus 15(3):24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Comer BT, Alfonso KP, Doyle EJ III, Gallogly JA, Simpson MC, Antisdel JL (2019) Analysis of absorbable hemostatic packing compared to physiologic hemostasis in functional endoscopic sinus Surgery with or without septoplasty. Am J Rhinol Allergy 33(5):531–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Cai C, Wang S (2014) Merocel versus nasopore for nasal packing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 9(4):e93959

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang TC, Tai CJ, Tsou YA, Tsai LT, Li YF, Tsai MH (2015) Absorbable and nonabsorbable packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:1825–1831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodworth BA, Chandra RK, LeBenger JD, Ilie B, Schlosser RJ (2009) A gelatin-thrombin matrix for hemostasis after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 30(1):49–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tran QK, Barnett J, O’Connell F, D’Anza B, Pourmand A (2021) Nasal packing in the emergency department: a practical review for emergency providers. Open Access Emerg Med 2:527–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Razali RA, Vijakumaran U, Fauzi MB, Lokanathan Y (2023) Maximizing postoperative recovery: the role of functional biomaterials as nasal packs—A comprehensive systematic review without meta-analysis (SWiM). Pharmaceutics 15(5):1534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Baumann A, Caversaccio M (2003) Hemostasis in endoscopic sinus surgery using a specific gelatin-thrombin based agent (FloSeal). Rhinology 41(4):244–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park DY, Chung HJ, Sim NS, Jo KH, Kim DH, Kim CH, Yoon JH (2016) Comparison of calcium alginate and carboxymethyl cellulose for nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective, randomised, controlled single-blinded trial. Clin Otolaryngol 41(3):234–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by datt mediproducts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akhil Pratap Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest for Dr Akhil Pratap Singh, Dr Saloni Singh, Dr Ridhima Malik and Dr Ritu Gupta. Dr Siddharth Pandey is the Head of Research and Development and Vice-President at Datt mediproducts, the manufacturer of VELNEZ nasal pack. VELNEZ is the product under study in this research.

Human and animal rights

Involving Human participants

Informed consent

In obtaining and documenting informed consent, the Investigator complied with applicable regulatory requirements, and adhered to ICMR Guidelines Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Accepted manuscript 3 Participants, International Conference on Harmonisation Guideline-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, A.P., Singh, S., Malik, R. et al. An Analysis of the VELNEZ Nasal Pack’s Acceptability and Safety for Use During Nasal Surgery: A Prospective Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 76, 1886–1890 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-04437-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-04437-2

Keywords

Navigation