Skip to main content
Log in

The Efficacy of Septal Quilting Sutures Versus Nasal Packing in Septoplasty

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Nasal packing is the classic method adopted by many otolaryngologists to stabilize the nasal septum and decrease the occurrence of postoperative bleeding and septal hematoma after septoplasty. However, because of its associated postoperative morbidity, many surgeons started to adopt alternative methods. This study aimed to assess the outcome and benefits of septal quilting sutures in comparison to nasal packing after septoplasty. A prospective non-randomized comparative interventional study was carried out at two teaching hospitals in Mosul city from January 2020 to January 2021. A total of 60 patients who were candidates for septoplasty, were included in the study. According to the surgeon's preference; 30 patients had placement of septal quilting sutures (group A), and in the other 30 patients nasal packing was performed (group B). Patients were assessed for postoperative morbidity and early outcome in the first 24 h, 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. In the first 24 h after septoplasty, patients in group B had significantly higher levels of nasal/facial pain, headache, sleep disturbance, breathing difficulties and swallowing difficulties compared to group A (p < 0.001). Over the follow up period of 1 month, no significant differences were recorded regarding postoperative bleeding, hematoma, infection, adhesions formation and septal perforation between the two groups (p > 0.05). Septal quilting sutures technique is more favorable in the early period in terms of patient discomfort after septoplasty, better nasal block and nasal/facial pain, the absence of misery on pack removal, with minimal bleeding after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsu DW, Suh JD (2018) Anatomy and physiology of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin NA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2018.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fettman N, Sanford T, Sindwani R (2009) Surgical management of the deviated septum: techniques in septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 42:241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezerra TFP, Stewart MG, Fornazieri MA et al (2012) Quality of life assessment septoplasty in patients with nasal obstruction. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78:57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Certal V, Silva H, Santos T et al (2012) Trans-septal suturing technique in septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rhinology 50:236–245. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhino12.051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W-W, Dong B-C (2017) Comparison on effectiveness of trans-septal suturing versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4709-2

  6. Mane RS, Patil B, Mohite A (2013) Comparison of septoplasty with and without nasal packing and review of literature. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 65:406–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-013-0626-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cukurova I, Cetinkaya EA, Mercan GC et al (2012) Retrospective analysis of 697 septoplasty surgery cases: packing versus trans-septal suturing method. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 32:111–114

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Korkut AY, Teker AM, Eren SB et al (2010) A randomised prospective trial of trans-septal suturing using a novel device versus nasal packing for septoplasty. Rhinology 48:179–182. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin09.098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalgic A, Is A, Dinc ME et al (2016) The effects of nasal packing and transseptal suturing after septoplasty on olfactory function, patient comfort, and mucociliary clearance. J Craniofac Surg 27:e487–e490. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Günaydân RÖ, Aygenc E, Karakullukcu S et al (2011) Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1151–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1542-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.01.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cayonu M, Acar A, Horasanli E et al (2014) Comparison of totally occlusive nasal pack, internal nasal splint, and transseptal suture technique after septoplasty in terms of immediate respiratory distress related to anesthesia and surgical complications. Acta Otolaryngol 134:390–394. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2013.878476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Turhan M, Bostanci A, Akdag M, Dinc O (2013) A comparison of the effects of packing or transseptal suture on polysomnographic parameters in septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:1339–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2199-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mustafa Said S, Abdulrazzaq AF (2015) Effect of trans-septal suture technique versus nasal packing after septoplasty. Int J Tech Res Appl 3:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  15. Özkiriş M, Kapusuz Z, Saydam L (2013) Comparison of nasal packs with transseptal suturing after nasal septal surgery. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Med Surg 34:308–311

    Google Scholar 

  16. Killera S, Padmanabhan D, Viswanatha B (2018) Nasal septal suture technique versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a prospective comparative study. J Otolaryngol Res 10:1–4. https://doi.org/10.15406/joentr.2018.10.00300

  17. Awan MS, Iqbal M (2008) Nasal packing after septoplasty: a randomized comparison of packing versus no packing in 88 patients. Ear Nose Throat J 87:624–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/014556130808701108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramalingam V, Venkatesan R, Somasundaram S et al (2019) A comparative study between septal quilting sutures without nasal packing and only nasal packing post-septal correction. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01730-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Ahmed Majeed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Before starting the study ethical approval was taken from local institutional committee (medical research ethics committee) with reference: UOM/COM/MREC/20–21(49).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majeed, S.A., Saeed, B.M. The Efficacy of Septal Quilting Sutures Versus Nasal Packing in Septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 2), 1713–1717 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02865-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02865-6

Keywords

Navigation