Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Inferior Turbinate and Uncinate Process Angulation with Normal Population in Patients with Septal Spur

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of septal spur may cause various pathologies by affecting the development of the inferior turbinate, osteomeatal unit and uncinate process. We aimed to compare the changes of the angle with inferior turbinate and the maxillary medial wall of the uncinate process in patients with septal spur by normal population. In the study, 138 patients with septal spur and unilateral septum deviation and 83 patients without septum deviation were evaluated retrospectively. The angles of the inferior turbinate and the uncinate process with the medial wall of the maxilla were measured at the ostemaetal unit level. The changes of the inferior turbinate and the uncinate process with the maxilla medial wall compared to the opposite side of the deviated side and the normal population were compared. Angle of the inferior turbinate with the medial wall of the maxilla is significantly smaller in the side with septum deviation to the side without septum deviation and normal population and significantly large in the side without septum deviation to normal population. Angle of the uncinate process with the medial wall of the maxilla is significantly large in the side with septum deviation to the side without septum deviation and normal population and significantly smaller in the side without septum deviation to normal population. Presence of septum base crest are thought to cause structural changes at the inferior turbinate and the uncinate process. We recommend to break the inferior turbinate at the concave side in patients with basal crest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roblin D, Eccles R (2002) What, if any, is the value of septal surgery? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 27:77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mundra R, Gupta Y, Sinha R et al (2014) CT scan study of influence of septal angle deviation on lateral nasal wall in patients of chronic rhinosinusitis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 66:187–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lasters F, Mallegho C, Boudewyns A et al (2014) Nasal symptoms in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and their impact on therapeutic compliance with continuous positive airway pressure. Acta Clin Belg 69:87–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Foda HM (2005) The role of septal surgery in management of the deviated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Illum P (1997) Septoplasty and compensatory inferior turbinate hypertrophy: long-term results randomized turbinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254:89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger G, Hammel I, Berger R et al (2000) Histopathology of the inferior turbinate with compensatory hypertrophy in patients with deviated nasal septum. Laryngoscope 110:2100–2105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rohrich RJ, Krueger JK, William AP et al (2001) Rationale for submucous resection of hypertrophied inferior turbinates in rhinoplasty: an evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:536–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy DW (1985) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: technique. Arch Otolaryngol 111:643–649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aramani A, Karadi RN, Kumar S (2014) A study of anatomical variations of osteomeatal complex in chronic rhinosinusitis patients-CT findings. J Clin Diagn Res 8:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee KC, Lee SS, Lee JK et al (2009) Medial fracturing of the inferior turbinate: effect on the ostiomeatal unit and the uncinate process. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:857–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berger G, Eviatar E, Kogan T et al (2013) The normal uncinate process: histology and clinical relevance. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:959–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Demirci S, Ertan N, Tuzuner A et al (2016) Correlation between the septal body and the nasal turbinates in patients with deviated Nasal septum. J Craniofac Surg 27:166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Egeli E, Demirci L, Yazici B et al (2004) Evaluation of the inferior turbinate in patients with deviated nasal septum by using computed tomography. Laryngoscope 114:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buyuklu F, Cakmak O, Hizal E et al (2009) Outfracture of the inferior turbinate: a computed tomography study. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1704–1779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jun BC, Kim SW, Kim SW et al (2009) Is turbinate surgery necessary when performing a septoplasty? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:975–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aksoy F, Yıldırım YS, Veyseller B et al (2010) Midterm outcomes of outfracture of the inferior turbinate. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143:579–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim YM, Rha KS, Weissman JD et al (2011) Correlation of asymmetric facial growth with deviated nasal septum. Laryngoscope 121:1144–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J, Dou X, Liu D et al (2016) Assessment of the effect of deviated nasal septum on the structure of nasal cavity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:1477–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors have confirm that the paper is not under consideration for review in any other journal.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made contributions to the paper, and have reviewed it before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hacer Baran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Consent

The authors obtained the written informed consents from the patients for publication of the report.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baran, H., Elibol, E. & Selcuk, A. Comparison of Inferior Turbinate and Uncinate Process Angulation with Normal Population in Patients with Septal Spur. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 71 (Suppl 3), 2194–2198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01652-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01652-8

Keywords

Navigation