Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking some roots of ecosystem approach in aquatic ecology: between the food cycle and lake metabolism

  • Research
  • Published:
Theory in Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study provides new insight into the key aspects of the early formative period of the ecosystem concept in aquatic ecology. Raymond Lindeman’s trophodynamics is known to be a starting point for the development of the modern concept of ecosystem. The trophodynamic approach in ecology was proposed by Lindeman in his widely cited paper of 1942. Lindeman’s views are analyzed in comparison with the contemporary production studies in aquatic ecology. It is shown that a similar theoretical system has been proposed in the USSR at the end of the 1930s by Georgiy G. Vinberg. He introduced the concept of biotic balance based on the wide appraisal of the dark and light bottles method. The study shows that both Lindeman’s trophodynamics and Vinberg’s concept of biotic balance relied on an energy-based approach in considering the wholeness of a water body. The two scientists, however, differed in several important aspects concerning the interpretation of the role of living organisms. The holistic interpretation of ecosystem by Lindeman and Vinberg can be seen as part of the dilemma between physicalism and organicism. At the same time, the main emphasis in the concepts of both Vinberg and Lindemann was on the primary production component, a feature that was common to the first holistic systems in production hydrobiology (e.g., E. Naumann’s regional limnology). It is clear that modern problems of aquatic ecology should be addressed from the perspective of the organismocentric understanding of the ecosystem, but undoubtedly at the new level of development of this view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. R. Lindeman is often credited with the statement (see, for instance, the reference in Karpowicz et al. 2020) that every next trophic level accounts only for 10% of energy of the previous level (i.e., the production ratio between adjacent trophic levels is 0.1). In the popular-science sources, this rule is often called “10% law” or “Lindeman’s law.” However, there is no reason to attribute this statement to him. It will be shown in the following text that Lindeman only postulated a progressive decrease in energy (because of energy dissipation) in going from one trophic level to the next, higher level.

  2. The Eltonian pyramid is a graphic representation of the numbers of individuals, biomass or energy across the trophic levels in an ecosystem. Consequently, there are Eltonian pyramids of numbers, biomass and energy.

  3. This is not an official translation of the journal name.

  4. There are two variants of English spelling of the researcher’s surname (Vinberg and Winberg).

  5. This is now the Ivan D. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters of the Russian Academy of Sciences (the Borok settlement of the Yaroslavl Region).

  6. The Institute is now located in Kaliningrad and is called the Kaliningrad State Technical University.

  7. This “parallelism” presents an opportunity for historians of science to take one particular country as a case study and explore the development of general principles in a certain scientific approach or subdiscipline in this country, without the risk of being accused of parochialism.

  8. This is Vinberg’s own reference to one of the papers of Lev S. Selivanov (1908–1945), a little-known Soviet biogeochemist, who in the 1930s explored the application of V. Vernadsky’s ideas in aquatic ecology. Selivanov considered the water body as a system of equilibria that is disturbed by living organisms. The fate of Selivanov was quite tragic. In 1941, during the Great Patriotic War he joined the army as a volunteer and was believed to be missing in action. Recent archival studies have shown that he was imprisoned by the Nazi and participated in a revolt in the concentration camp, during which he was killed (http://catalog.lib.tpu.ru/files/names/document/RU/TPU/pers/8946).

  9. It should be remembered that A. Tansley was against the organismocentric interpretation of superorganismal levels and introduced the term “ecosystem” as part of criticism of F. Clements’ writings (Valk 2014). Tansley understood the ecosystem as a physical object and a certain unit in nature, in which living and non-living components are equally represented and play the same role.

  10. This is not an official translation of the journal name.

  11. Since its founding in 1933 to the present day, the journal “Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR” accepts articles, whose authors are academicians or corresponding members of the Russian Academy of Sciences (formerly the USSR Academy of Sciences). The articles of other authors are accepted only on condition that they have been presented (i.e., recommended for publication) by an academician of the respective discipline.

  12. It is known that G.E. Hutchinson was closely acquainted with Georgiy V. Vernadsky, a son of V.I. Vernadsky, when the latter was teaching in Yale University as a professor (Golley 1993). Georgiy introduced Hutchinson to his father’s works and materials. Lindeman learned about Vernadsky’s ideas from Hutchinson and was greatly influenced by them while editing his manuscript on trophodynamics. Although Lindeman mentioned Vernadsky in his 1942 paper, it remains unclear, however, as to how exactly he employed Vernadsky’s ideas in developing his own concept.

References

  • Alimov AF (2003) Towards a theory of the functioning of aquatic ecosystems. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckel AL (1987) Breaking New Waters. A century of limnology at the University of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge EA (1907) The respiration of an inland lake. Trans Am Fish Soc 36:223–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge EA, Juday Ch (1911) The inland lakes of Wisconsin: the dissolved gases of the water and their biological significance. Wisconsin Geol Nat History Surv Bull 22:1–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge EA, Juday Ch (1912) A limnological study of the Finger Lakes of New York. Bull Bur Fish 32:525–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocking S (1990) Fisheries and fundamental science: Donald Rawson’s studies of lake productivity. Sci Can 1:38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocking S (2013) The ecosystem: research and practice in North America. Web Ecol 13:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke GL, Oster R (1934) The penetration of the blue and red component of daylight into Atlantic coastal waters and its relation to phytoplankton metabolism. Biol Bull 67:59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook RE (1977) Raymond Lindeman and the trophic-dynamic concept in ecology. Science 198:22–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dineen CF (1953) An Ecological Study of a Minnesota Pond. Am Midl Nat 50:349–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egerton F (1973) Changing concepts of the balance of nature. Q Rev Biol 48:322–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egerton F (2017) History of ecological sciences, part 59: niches, biomes, ecosystems, and systems. Bull Ecol Soc Am 98:298–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster H-J (1974) History of limnology. Mitteilungen — Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 20: 7–30

  • Entz B (2008) The dissolved oxygen determination method is 120 years old in memoriam Lajos Winkler (1863–1939) and Rezso Maucha (1882–1964). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 54(Supplement 1):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes SA (1925) The lake as a microcosm. The Natural History Survey Division Bulletin XV: 537–550.

  • Frey DG (1963) Wiskonsin: the Birge — Juday Era. In: Frey DG (ed) Limnology in North America. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 3–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaarder T, Gran HH (1927) Investigations of the production of plankton in the Oslo Fjord. J Conseil II:372–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarov AM (1992) Ecology, mythology and the organismic way of thinking in limnology. Trends Ecol Evol 7:22–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarov AM (1994) The progress of ecology on the limnological road. Rus J of Aquat Ecol 3:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghilarov AM (2005) Fenomen Vinberga [Phenomenon of Georgiy G. Vinberg]. Priroda 12:47–60 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman C (1968) Aquatic primary production. Am Zool 8:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB (1993) A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology (more than the sum of the parts). Yale University Press, New Haven and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham LR (1987) Science, philosophy, and human behaviour in the Soviet Union. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich K (1934) Atmung und assimilation in friesen wasser. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 30:387–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1938) On the relation between the oxygen deficit and the productivity and typology of lakes. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 36:336–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1973) Eutrophication. Am Sci 61:269–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev VS (1939) Metod opredeleniya kaloriynosti gidrobiologicheskikh prob [The technique for the calorific assessment of hydrobiological samples]. Nauchno-Metodicheskie Zapiski 5:65–72 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jax K (2020) “Organismic” positions in early German — speaking ecology and its (almost) forgotten dissidents. Hist Philos Life Sci 42:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkin P (1930) A preliminary limnological survey of Loch Awe (Argyllshire): an investigation of some physical and chemical conditions in the Loch and experiments on photosynthesis at various depths. Int Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 24:24–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone J (1908) Conditions of life in the sea. The University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Juday Ch (1940) The annual energy budget of an inland lake. Ecology 21:438–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juday Ch, Fred EB, Wilson FC (1924) The hydrogen ion concentration of certain Wisconsin lake waters. Trans Am Microsc Soc 43:177–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juday Ch, Blair JM, Wilda EF (1943) The photosynthetic activities of the aquatic plants of Little John Lake, Vilas County, Wisconsin. Am Midl Nat 30:426–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpowicz M, Zielinski P, Grabowska M, Ejsmont-Karabin J, Kozlowska J, Feniova I (2020) Effect of eutrophication and humification on nutrient cycles and transfer efficiency of matter in freshwater food webs. Hydrobiologia 847:2521–2540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov SI (1934) Sravnitel’noe izuchenie azotnogo, fosfornogo i kislorodnogo rezhima Glubokogo i Belogo ozera [Comparative investigation of nitrogen, phosphorus and oxygen regime of the Lake Glubokoe and Lake Beloe]. Trudy Limnologicheskoy Stantsii v Kosine 17:49–67 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedintsev AA (1904) Gazovyy obmen v zamknutykh vodoemakh i ego znachenie dlya rybovodstva [Gas exchange in closed water bodies and its significance for fish breeding]. Iz Nikol’skogo Rybovodnogo Zavoda 9:113–136 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedintsev AA (1908) Popytka opredelit’ zapasy ryby v ozere po ego kislorodnomu balansu [An attempt to determine of fish reserves in the lake by its oxygen balance]. Iz Nikol’skogo Rybovodnogo Zavoda 11:81–111 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levit GS (2011) Looking at Russian ecology through the biosphere theory. In: Schwarz A, Jax K (eds) Ecology revisited: reflecting on concepts, advancing science. Springer, pp 333–347

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman R (1941a) Seasonal food-cycle dynamics in a senescent lake. Am Midl Nat 26:636–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman R (1941b) The developmental history of Cedar Creek Bog, Minnesota. Am Midl Nat 25:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindeman R (1942) The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23:399–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb J (1916) The organism as a whole from a physicochemical viewpoint. Putnam’s Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manning WM, Juday RE (1941) The chlorophyll content and productivity of some lakes in Northeastern Wisconsin. Trans Wisconsin Acad Sci Arts Lett 33:363–393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maucha R (1924) Upon the influence of temperature and intensity of light on the photosynthetic production of nannoplankton. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 2:381–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer CH (1939) The nitrogen balance of large quantities of water. The Work Freshw Biol Assoc Great Br Regard Wat Supplies 21:2–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann E (1929) The scope and chief problems of regional limnology. Sonderdruck aus Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 22:423–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pütter A (1924) Der Umfang der Kohlensaurereduktion durch die Planktonalgen. Pflugers Archiv Fur Die Gesamte Physiologie 205:293–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley G (1938a) Plankton studies. I. A preliminary investigation of the plankton of the Tortugas region. J Mar Res 1:335–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley G (1938b) The measurement of phytoplankton. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie 36:371–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley G (1939) Correlations in aquatic ecology with an example of their application to problems of plankton productivity. J Mar Res 2:56–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley GA (1940) Limnological studies in Connecticut. III. The plankton of Linsley Pond. Ecol Monogr 10:279–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riley GA (1944) The carbon metabolism and photosynthetic efficiency of the Earth as a whole. Am Sci 32:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizhinashvili AL (2019) Ernst Haeckel’s «ecology» in Russia of the first half of the twentieth century. Theory Biosci 138:89–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizhinashvili AL (2020) Production hydrobiology in the USSR under the pressure of Lysenkoism: Vladimir I. Zhadin’s forgotten theory of biological productivity (1940). J Hist Biol 53:105–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossolimo LL (1931) Gidrologicheskiy ocherk Pereslavskogo ozera [Hydrological essay on the Lake Pereslavskoe]. Trudy Limnologicheskoy Stantsii v Kosine 13–14:69–129 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossolimo LL (1934) Zadachi i ustanovki limnologii kak nauki [Problems and principles of the limnology as a science]. Trudy Limnologicheskoy Stantsii v Kosine 17:5–19 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rylov WM (1927) Einige Gesichtspunkte zur Biodynamik des Limnoplanktons. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 3:405–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider DW (2000) Local knowledge, environmental politics, and the founding of ecology in the United States: Stephen Forbes and “The lake as a microcosm” (1887). Isis 91:681–705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schomer HA (1934) Photosynthesis of water plants at various depths in the lakes of North-Eastern Wisconsin. Ecology 15:217–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz A, Jax K (2011) Early ecology in the German-speaking world through WWII. In: Schwarz A, Jax K (eds) Ecology revisited: reflecting on concepts, advancing science. Springer, pp 231–275

  • Selivanov LS (1936) Gazovye ravnovesiya prirodnykh eutrophnykh presnovodnykh vodoemov [Gas equilibrium in natural eutrophic fresh water bodies]. Zapiski Bolshevskoy Biologicheskoy Stantsii 9:57–65 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skadovsky SN (1928) Aktivnaya reaktsiya sredy v presnykh vodoemakh i ee biologicheskoe znachenie [Active reaction of the water in the water bodies and its biological significance]. In: Skadovsky SN (ed) Primenenie metodov phizicheskoy khimii k izucheniyu biologii presnykh vod. Publishing House of State Institute of People Healthcare, Moscow, pp 11–74 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skadowsky SN (1923) Hydrophysiologische und Hydrobiologische Beobachtungen uber die Bedeutung der Reaktion des Mediums fur die Susswasserorganismen. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 2:341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Skadowsky SN (1926) Uber die Aktuelle Reaktion der Susswasserbecken und ihre Biologische Bedeutung. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 3:109–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobczak WV (2005) Lindeman’s trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology: “will you still need me when I’m 64?” Limnol Oceanogr Bull 14(3):53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staehr PA, Testa JM, Kemp WM, Cole JJ, Sand-Jensen K, Smith SV (2012) The metabolism of aquatic ecosystems: history, applications, and future challenges. Aquat Sci 74:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW (2012) Raymond Laurel Lindeman and the trophic dynamic viewpoint. Limnol Oceanogr Bull 21(2):38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strom KM (1924) pH-values in Norwegian Mountains. Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne 62:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom KM (1928) Production biology of temperate lakes. Sonderdruck aus Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie XIX:329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strom KM (1927–1928) Recent advances in limnology. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London (Session 140): 96–110

  • Talling JF (2008) The developmental history of inland-water science. Freshw Rev 1:119–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16:284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PJ (1988) Technocratic optimism, H.T. Odum, and the partial transformation of ecological metaphor after World War II. J Hist Biol 21:213–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toogood M, Waterton C, Heim W (2020) Women scientists and the Freshwater Biological Association, 1929–1950. Arch Nat Hist 47:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk AG (2014) From formation to ecosystem: Tansley’s response to Clements’ climax. J Hist Biol 47:293–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1928) Planktonologicheskie i phiziko-khimicheskie issledovaniya Popova pruda [Planktonological and physico-chemical investigations of the Popov Pond]. In: Skadovsky SN (ed) Primenenie metodov phizicheskoy khimii k izucheniyu biologii presnykh vod. Publishing House of State Institute of People Healthcare, Moscow, pp 352–365 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1934) Opyt izucheniya photosinteza i dykhaniya v vodnoy masse ozera. K voprosu o balanse organicheskogo veshchestva. Soobshchenie 1 [An experience of investigation of the photosynthesis and respiration in lake water masses. Toward to the organic matter balance]. Trudy Limnologicheskoy Stantsii v Kosine 18:5–21 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1936) Nekotorye obshchie voprosy produktivnosti ozer [Some general problems of lakes productivity]. Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal 15:587–602 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1940) Ob izmerenii skorosti obmena kisloroda mezhdu vodoemom i atmospheroy [On the measurement of rate of oxygen exchange between the water body and air]. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 26:674–677 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1948a) Bioticheskiy balans Chernogo Ozera [Biotic balance of the Lake Chernoe]. Byulleten’ MOIP 53:11–19 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1948b) Effektivnost’ utilizatsii solnechnoy radiatsii planktonom [The efficiency of utilization of sun radiation by the plankton]. Priroda 12:29–35 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1956) Pervichnaya produktsiya planktona [Primary production of the plankton]. Zhurnal Obshchey Biologii 17:364–376 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1960) Pervichnaya produktsiya vodoemov [The plankton primary production]. Publishing House of the Belarus Soviet Socialistic Republic Academy of Sciences, Minsk (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1971) Methods for the estimation of production of aquatic animals. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG, Yarovitsina LI (1946) Razmnozhenie bakteriy i pogloshchenie kisloroda v vode [Bacteria reproduction and oxygen consumption in the water]. Mikrobiologiya 15:499–508 (In Russian)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg G, Ivlev V, Platova T, Rossolimo L (1934) Metodika opredeleniya organicheskogo veshchestva i opyt kaloricheskoy otsenki kormovykh zapasov vodoema [Technique for the determination of organic matter and experience of calorific estimation of food reserves of water body]. Trudy Limnologicheskoy Stantsii v Kosine 18:25–39 (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinberg GG (1946) Bioticheskiy balans veshchestva i energii ozer [Biotic balance of matter and energy in lakes]. Doctoral Thesis (Manuscript). Biological Station of the USSR Academy of Sciences “Borok” (In Russian)

  • Voigt A (2011) The rise of systems theory in ecology. In: Schwarz A, Jax K (eds) Ecology revisited: reflecting on concepts, advancing science. Springer, pp 183–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Voronkov NV (1913) Plankton presnykh vod [Freshwater plankton]. M.M. Ryabushinskiy Printing House, Moscow (In Russian)

  • Watts E, Hossfeld U, Levit G (2019) Ecology and evolution: Haeckel’s Darwinian paradigm. Trends Ecol Evol 34:681–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner DR (1988) Models of Nature. Ecology, Conservation and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am deeply grateful to staff of the Scientific Library of the Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (especially to a head of the Library Dr. Evgeniya S. Labina and to librarians Svetlana M. Pul’kkinen, Anna A. Khalina, Elena S. Labina, and to researcher Yulia A. Dunaeva) for perennial priceless help in my work. I am indebted to translator Dr. Anatoliy A. Petrov (Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences) for his great assistance.

Funding

The research was conducted under state budget financing of the Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All work was done by A.R.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra L. Rizhinashvili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rizhinashvili, A.L. Rethinking some roots of ecosystem approach in aquatic ecology: between the food cycle and lake metabolism. Theory Biosci. 143, 131–151 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-024-00416-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-024-00416-5

Keywords

Navigation