Skip to main content
Log in

Polysulphone composite membranes modified with two types of carbon additives as a potential material for bone tissue regeneration

  • Published:
Bulletin of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a detailed evaluation of the impact of carbon fibrous materials on the physicochemical properties of polysulphone (PSU) membranes and their preliminary osteoblast-like cells response in vitro. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and short carbon fibres (SCFs) were incorporated into PSU and membranes were produced by the phase inversion method. Then, the physicochemical properties of the membranes’ surface were investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate microstructure and porosity. Surface properties such as roughness, wettability and surface energy were evaluated using atomic force microscopy (AFM), contact profilometry and a goniometer, respectively. The presence of carbon fibrous additives in the PSU matrix improved its hydrophilicity. Porosity and topography of the PSU membranes were also changed upon incorporation of carbon additives. The mechanical properties of the PSU membranes were improved after SCF addition. All physicochemical properties of the obtained composite membranes had significant impact on the osteoblast-like cells response. Preliminary viability tests indicated biocompatibility of all membranes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker R 2004 Membrane technology and applications (Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd)

  2. Krause B, Storr M, Ertl T, Buck R, Hildwein H, Deppisch R and Göhl H 2003 Chem. Ing. Tech. 75 1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stamatialis D F, Papenburg B J, Gironés M, Saiful S, Bettahalli S N, Schmitmeier S and Wessling M 2008 J. Membr. Sci. 308 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Retzepi M and Donos N 2010 Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21 567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Milella E, Ramires P A, Brescia E, La Sala G, Di Paola L and Bruno V 2001 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 58 427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang H -L, Miyauchi M and Takata T 2002 J. Periodontal Res. 37 340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strietzel F P, Khongkhunthian P, Khattiya R, Patchanee P and Reichart P A 2006 J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 78 35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nechifor G, Voicu S, Nechifor A and Garea S 2009 Desalination 241 342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blazewicz M 2001 Eur. Cells Mater. 2 21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li C S, Vannabouathong C, Sprague S and Bhandari M 2015 Clin. Med. Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet. Disord. 8 33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajzer I, Menaszek E, Bacakova L, Rom M and Blazewicz M 2010 J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21 2611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rajzer I, Rom M and Blazewicz M 2010 Fibers Polym. 11 615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrison B S and Atala A 2007 Biomaterials 28 344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tran P A, Zhang L and Webster T J 2009 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61 1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chlopek J, Czajkowska B, Szaraniec B, Frackowiak E, Szostak K and Beguin F 2006 Carbon 44 1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deligianni D D 2014 Cell Adhes. Migrat. 8 558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Newman P, Minett A, Ellis-Behnke R and Zreiqat H 2013 Nanomedicine 9 1139

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pan L, Pei X, He R, Wan Q and Wang J 2012 Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 93 226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sitharaman B, Shi X, Walboomers X F, Liao H, Cuijpers V, Wilson L J, Mikos A G and Jansen J A 2008 Bone 43 362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stankova L, Fraczek-Szczypta A, Blazewicz M, Filova E, Blazewicz S, Lisa V and Bacakova L 2014 Carbon 67 578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi J -H, Jegal J and Kim W -N 2006, J. Membr. Sci. 284 406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geise G M, Lee H -S, Miller D J, Freeman B D, McGrath J E and Paul D R 2010 J. Polym. Sci. Part B : Polym. Phys. 48 1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuenyao C, Tirawanichakul Y and Chittrakarn T 2015 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132

  24. De Lannoy C -F, Soyer E and Wiesner M R 2013 J. Membr. Sci. 447 395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandes G, Pinto J and Nobrega R 2001 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 82 3036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khalid A, Al-Juhani A A, Al-Hamouz O C, Laoui T, Khan Z and Atieh M A 2015 Desalination 367 134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maphutha S, Moothi K, Meyyappan M and Iyuke S E 2013 Sci. Rep. 3

  28. Sedláková Z, Clarizia G, Bernardo P, Jansen J C, Slobodian P, Svoboda P, Kárászová M, Friess K and Izak P 2014 Membranes 4 20

  29. Carrero-Sanchez J, Elias A, Mancilla R, Arrellin G, Terrones H, Laclette J and Terrones M 2006 Nano Lett. 6 1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simone S, Figoli A, Criscuoli A, Carnevale M, Rosselli A and Drioli E 2010 J. Membr. Sci. 364 219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fraczek A and Blazewicz S 2009 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 146 012005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fraczek-Szczypta A and Blazewicz S 2011 J. Mater. Sci. 46 5680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Owens D K and Wendt R C 1969 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13 1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sopyan I, Mel M, Ramesh S and Khalid K 2007 Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 8 116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang B S, Lee C K, Hong K S, Youn H J, Ryu H S, Chung S S and Park K W 2000 Biomaterials 21 1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bose S, Cardinaels R, Özdilek C, Leys J, Seo J W, Wübbenhorst M and Moldenaers P 2014 Eur. Polym. J. 53 253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nobile M 2011 Polymer–carbon nanotube composites : preparation, properties and applications (Sawston, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing) 15 428

  38. Wienk I, Boom R, Beerlage M, Bulte A, Smolders C and Strathmann H 1996 J. Membr. Sci. 113 361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cowin S C and Cardoso L 2015 J. Biomech. 48 842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Imade S, Mori R, Uchio Y and Furuya S 2009 J. Orthop. Sci. 14 652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Faia-Torres A B, Charnley M, Goren T, Guimond-Lischer S, Rottmar M, Maniura-Weber K, Spencer N D, Reis R L, Textor M and Neves N M 2015 Acta Biomater. 28 64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gittens R A, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, Cai Y, Berner S, Tannenbaum R, Schwartz Z, Sandhage K H and Boyan B D 2011 Biomaterials 32 3395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hopfgarten F 1978 Fibre Sci. Technol. 11 67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Boehm H -P, Diehl E, Heck W and Sappok R 1964 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 3 669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pampuch R 1986 Włókna weglowe (Wydawnictwo AGH: Krakow)

  46. Lim J Y, Shaughnessy M C, Zhou Z, Noh H, Vogler E A and Donahue H J 2008 Biomaterials 29 1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Owen R, Sherborne C, Paterson T, Green N H, Reilly G C and Claeyssens F 2016 J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 54 159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Brunet L, Lyon D, Zodrow K, Rouch J -C, Caussat B, Serp P, Remigy J -C, Wiesner M and Alvarez P 2008 Environ. Eng. Sci. 25 565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Aillon K L, Xie Y, El-Gendy N, Berkland C J and Forrest M L 2009 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61 457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fraczek-Szczypta A, Menaszek E and Blazewicz S 2011 J. Nanomater. 5

  51. Fraczek-Szczypta A, Menaszek E, Blazewicz S, Adu J, Shevchenko R, Syeda T B, Misra A and Alavijeh M 2015 Mater. Sci. Eng. C 46 218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kagan V, Tyurina Y, Tyurin V, Konduru N, Potapovich A, Osipov A, Kisin E, Schwegler-Berry D, Mercer R, Castranova V and Shvedova A 2006 Toxicol. Lett. 165 88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sato Y, Yokoyama A, Shibata K, Akimoto Y, Ogino S -I, Nodasaka Y, Kohgo T, Tamura K, Akasaka T, Uo M, Motomiya K, Jeyadevan B, Ishiguro M, Hatakeyama R, Watari F and Tohji K 2005 Mol. Biosyst. 1 176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wick P, Manser P, Limbach L K, Dettlaff-Weglikowska U, Krumeich F, Roth S, Stark W J and Bruinink A 2007 Toxicol. Lett. 168 121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Coccini T, Roda E, Sarigiannis D, Mustarelli P, Quartarone E, Profumo A and Manzo L 2010 Toxicology 269 41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Saito N, Usui Y, Aoki K, Narita N, Shimizu M, Ogiwara N, Nakamura K, Ishigaki N, Kato H, Taruta S and Endo M 2008 Curr. Med. Chem. 15 523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Flores-Cedillo M, Alvarado-Estrada K, Pozos-Guillén A, Murgu-Ibarra J, Vidal M, Cervantes-Uc J, Rosales-Ibáñez R and Cauich-Rodríguez J 2016 J. Mater. Sci. : Mater. Med. 27 1

    Google Scholar 

  58. Saffar K P, Rouhi G and JamilPour N 2009 Carbon nanotubes in bone tissue engineering (Croatia: INTECH Open Access Publisher)

  59. Saito N, Haniu H, Usui Y, Aoki K, Hara K, Takanashi S, Shimizu M, Narita N, Okamoto M, Kobayashi S, Nomura H, Kato H, Nishimura N, Taruta S and Endo M 2014 Chem. Rev. 114 6040

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was financed from the statute funds of AGH-UST, Faculty of Materials Engineering and Ceramics, Project no.11.11.160.616. M T acknowledges the financial support from the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, through MURI grant FA9550-12-1-0035.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ANETA FRACZEK-SZCZYPTA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

WEDEL-GRZENDA, A., FRACZEK-SZCZYPTA, A., TERRONES, M. et al. Polysulphone composite membranes modified with two types of carbon additives as a potential material for bone tissue regeneration. Bull Mater Sci 40, 201–212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1360-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-017-1360-x

Keywords

Navigation