Abstract
Purpose
Patients with a history of advanced adenomas are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), yet rates of adherence to current surveillance colonoscopy guidelines are poor. We determined rates of referral and adherence to 3-year interval surveillance colonoscopy in patients with advanced adenomas and identified modifiable factors as possible intervention targets to improve surveillance referral and adherence in these at-risk patients.
Methods
We reviewed electronic medical records (EMR) of patients (N = 103) who had pathology findings on screening colonoscopy that warranted a 3-year surveillance colonoscopy. We abstracted demographics, surveillance colonoscopy completion rate, documentation of initial pathology in the “Problem List” of the EMR, and timing and nature of visits to a primary care physician (PCP).
Results
Only 22 (21.4 %) patients had a record of surveillance colonoscopy completion. Among non-completers, 50.6 % of patients had no PCP visit within a year of their surveillance due date, 19.8 % saw a PCP and were not referred, and 29.6 % saw a PCP and were referred to either a gastroenterology consultation or a surveillance colonoscopy. Pathology found on initial screening was noted in the Problem List of 77.3 % of completers but only 33.3 % of non-completers (p ≤ 0.001).
Conclusions
Possible targets for interventions include using EMRs to improve physician communication and encouraging patients to have timely PCP visits and follow-through after colonoscopy referral. Clinical studies in this area have the potential to improve outcomes for patients by reducing CRC mortality through early detection.
References
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.
Cooper GS, Kou TD, Barnholtz Sloan JS, et al. Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2013;119:1800–7.
Calo,D, Glick,MP, Winawer, SJ, et al. Using patient navigation to minimize racial disparities in screening and surveillance colonoscopy in a large diverse urban population [abstract]. In: DIgestive Disease Week; 2013 May 18–21; Orlando, FL; AGA; 2013. S-40-S-41. Abstract nr 172.
Sanaka MR, Super DM, Feldman ES, et al. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:97–103.
Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterol. 2012;143:844–57.
Leffler DA, Neeman N, Rabb JM. An alerting system improves adherence to follow-up recommendations from colonoscopy examinations. Gastroenterol. 2011;140:1166–73. e3.
Ayanian JZ, Sequist TD, Johannes RS. Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:762–7.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braschi, C., Pelto, D.J., Hennelly, M.O. et al. Patient-, Provider-, and System-Level Factors in Low Adherence to Surveillance Colonoscopy Guidelines: Implications for Future Interventions. J Gastrointest Canc 45, 500–503 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-014-9653-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-014-9653-4