Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient-, Provider-, and System-Level Factors in Low Adherence to Surveillance Colonoscopy Guidelines: Implications for Future Interventions

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with a history of advanced adenomas are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), yet rates of adherence to current surveillance colonoscopy guidelines are poor. We determined rates of referral and adherence to 3-year interval surveillance colonoscopy in patients with advanced adenomas and identified modifiable factors as possible intervention targets to improve surveillance referral and adherence in these at-risk patients.

Methods

We reviewed electronic medical records (EMR) of patients (N = 103) who had pathology findings on screening colonoscopy that warranted a 3-year surveillance colonoscopy. We abstracted demographics, surveillance colonoscopy completion rate, documentation of initial pathology in the “Problem List” of the EMR, and timing and nature of visits to a primary care physician (PCP).

Results

Only 22 (21.4 %) patients had a record of surveillance colonoscopy completion. Among non-completers, 50.6 % of patients had no PCP visit within a year of their surveillance due date, 19.8 % saw a PCP and were not referred, and 29.6 % saw a PCP and were referred to either a gastroenterology consultation or a surveillance colonoscopy. Pathology found on initial screening was noted in the Problem List of 77.3 % of completers but only 33.3 % of non-completers (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions

Possible targets for interventions include using EMRs to improve physician communication and encouraging patients to have timely PCP visits and follow-through after colonoscopy referral. Clinical studies in this area have the potential to improve outcomes for patients by reducing CRC mortality through early detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper GS, Kou TD, Barnholtz Sloan JS, et al. Use of colonoscopy for polyp surveillance in Medicare beneficiaries. Cancer. 2013;119:1800–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calo,D, Glick,MP, Winawer, SJ, et al. Using patient navigation to minimize racial disparities in screening and surveillance colonoscopy in a large diverse urban population [abstract]. In: DIgestive Disease Week; 2013 May 18–21; Orlando, FL; AGA; 2013. S-40-S-41. Abstract nr 172.

  5. Sanaka MR, Super DM, Feldman ES, et al. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterol. 2012;143:844–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leffler DA, Neeman N, Rabb JM. An alerting system improves adherence to follow-up recommendations from colonoscopy examinations. Gastroenterol. 2011;140:1166–73. e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayanian JZ, Sequist TD, Johannes RS. Physician reminders to promote surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal adenomas. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:762–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlyn Braschi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braschi, C., Pelto, D.J., Hennelly, M.O. et al. Patient-, Provider-, and System-Level Factors in Low Adherence to Surveillance Colonoscopy Guidelines: Implications for Future Interventions. J Gastrointest Canc 45, 500–503 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-014-9653-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-014-9653-4

Keywords

Navigation