Abstract
Purpose
The standard of care treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) is a combination of streptozotocin and 5-FU. Although widely used, little is known about the best long-term strategy with these substances.
Methods
We here report our experience of 28 patients treated with streptozotocin/5-FU for advanced pNET with special consideration for long-term management using an extended cycle protocol.
Results
Standard 6-weekly Moertel protocol resulted in a median progression-free survival of 21 months (range 3–128) and a median overall survival of 69 months (range 3–157+) in the whole cohort. Thirteen of the 28 patients were switched to an extended 3-month cycle protocol for maintenance therapy. Of these 13 patients, 2 achieved complete remission, 1 partial remission, and 8 stable disease as best response while 2 showed progressive disease following switch to the extended protocol, resulting in an additional median progression-free survival of 23 months. Median overall survival after the start of chemotherapy in this patient group was 69 months (21–157+). Patients benefitted from extended periods free of chemotherapy-associated side effects after switching to the extended cycle protocol.
Conclusions
Switching to an extended cycle protocol of 3 months for maintenance therapy following initial standard cycles may achieve long-term disease stabilization in selected patients with advanced pNET with good patient acceptance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.G. Moertel, M. Lefkopoulo, S. Lipsitz, R.G. Hahn, D. Klaassen, Streptozocin-doxorubicin, streptozocin-fluorouracil or chlorozotocin in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 326(8), 519–523 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199202203260804
M. Pavel, D. O’Toole, F. Costa, J. Capdevila, D. Gross, R. Kianmanesh, E. Krenning, U. Knigge, R. Salazar, U.F. Pape, K. Oberg, Vienna Consensus Conference, p.: ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Distant Metastatic Disease of Intestinal, Pancreatic, Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of Unknown Primary Site. Neuroendocrinology 103(2), 172–185 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1159/000443167
W. Sun, S. Lipsitz, P. Catalano, J.A. Mailliard, D.G. Haller, Eastern Cooperative Oncology, G.: Phase II/III study of doxorubicin with fluorouracil compared with streptozocin with fluorouracil or dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced carcinoid tumors: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1281. J. Clin. Oncol. 23(22), 4897–4904 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.616
P.F. Engstrom, P.T. Lavin, C.G. Moertel, E. Folsch, H.O. Douglass Jr., Streptozocin plus fluorouracil versus doxorubicin therapy for metastatic carcinoid tumor. J. Clin. Oncol. 2(11), 1255–1259 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1984.2.11.1255
S. Krug, M. Boch, H. Daniel, W. Nimphius, D. Muller, P. Michl, A. Rinke, T.M. Gress, Streptozocin-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms–Predictive and Prognostic Markers for Treatment Stratification. PLoS ONE 10(12), e0143822 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143822
L.M. Dilz, T. Denecke, I.G. Steffen, V. Prasad, L.F. von Weikersthal, U.F. Pape, B. Wiedenmann, M. Pavel, Streptozocin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy is associated with durable response in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur. J. Cancer 51(10), 1253–1262 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.005
P. Clewemar Antonodimitrakis, A. Sundin, C. Wassberg, D. Granberg, B. Skogseid, B. Eriksson, Streptozocin and 5-Fluorouracil for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Efficacy, Prognostic Factors and Toxicity. Neuroendocrinology 103(3-4), 345–353 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1159/000439086
E.A. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, J. Bogaerts, L.H. Schwartz, D. Sargent, R. Ford, J. Dancey, S. Arbuck, S. Gwyther, M. Mooney, L. Rubinstein, L. Shankar, L. Dodd, R. Kaplan, D. Lacombe, J. Verweij, New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer 45(2), 228–247 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
J.P. Vandenbroucke, E. von Elm, D.G. Altman, P.C. Gotzsche, C.D. Mulrow, S.J. Pocock, C. Poole, J.J. Schlesselman, M. Egger, S. Initiative, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18(6), 805–835 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511
J.C. Yao, M.H. Shah, T. Ito, C.L. Bohas, E.M. Wolin, E. Van Cutsem, T.J. Hobday, T. Okusaka, J. Capdevila, E.G. de Vries, P. Tomassetti, M.E. Pavel, S. Hoosen, T. Haas, J. Lincy, D. Lebwohl, K. Oberg, Rad001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, T.T.S.G.: Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 364(6), 514–523 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009290
E. Raymond, L. Dahan, J.L. Raoul, Y.J. Bang, I. Borbath, C. Lombard-Bohas, J. Valle, P. Metrakos, D. Smith, A. Vinik, J.S. Chen, D. Horsch, P. Hammel, B. Wiedenmann, E. Van Cutsem, S. Patyna, D.R. Lu, C. Blanckmeister, R. Chao, P. Ruszniewski, Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 364(6), 501–513 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1003825
M.E. Caplin, M. Pavel, J.B. Cwikla, A.T. Phan, M. Raderer, E. Sedlackova, G. Cadiot, E.M. Wolin, J. Capdevila, L. Wall, G. Rindi, A. Langley, S. Martinez, J. Blumberg, P. Ruszniewski, C. Investigators, Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 371(3), 224–233 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1316158
M.Falconi, B.Eriksson, G.Kaltsas, D.K.Bartsch, J.Capdevila, M.Caplin, B.Kos-Kudla, D.Kwekkeboom, G.Rindi, G.Kloppel, N.Reed, R.Kianmanesh, R.T.Jensen,, ViennaConsensus Conference, p.: ENETS Consensus Guidelines Updatefor the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic NeuroendocrineTumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology 103(2), 153–171 (2016).
G. Capurso, R. Bettini, M. Rinzivillo, L. Boninsegna, G. Delle Fave, M. Falconi, Role of resection of the primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour only in patients with unresectable metastatic liver disease: a systematic review. Neuroendocrinology 93(4), 223–229 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1159/000324770
E. Bertani, N. Fazio, D. Radice, C. Zardini, G. Spinoglio, A. Chiappa, D. Ribero, R. Biffi, S. Partelli, M. Falconi, Assessing the role of primary tumour resection in patients with synchronous unresectable liver metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour of the body and tail. A propensity score survival evaluation. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 43(2), 372–379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.011
E. Vilar, R. Salazar, J. Perez-Garcia, J. Cortes, K. Oberg, J. Tabernero, Chemotherapy and role of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in digestive neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 14(2), 221–232 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-06-0074
D. O’Toole, A. Couvelard, V. Rebours, M. Zappa, O. Hentic, P. Hammel, P. Levy, P. Bedossa, E. Raymond, P. Ruszniewski, Molecular markers associated with response to chemotherapy in gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 17(4), 847–856 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-09-0204
C. Yoo, H. Cho, M.J. Song, S.M. Hong, K.P. Kim, H.M. Chang, H. Chae, T.W. Kim, Y.S. Hong, M.H. Ryu, Y.K. Kang, S.C. Kim, B.Y. Ryoo, Efficacy and safety of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 79(1), 139–146 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3215-3
Funding
This study was not funded by external sources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
J.S. and D.B. received travel assistance, speaker honoraria, and research funding from Novartis and IPSEN. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The local ethics committee approved retrospective collection and analysis of patient data without written informed consent from patients (Ärztekammer Hamburg, WF-023/13). A written informed consent of patients was not deemed necessary due to anonymous data analysis performed in accordance with local governmental guidelines. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schrader, J., Henes, F.O., Blaeker, M. et al. Extended cycle streptozotocin/5-FU chemotherapy for maintenance therapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrine 65, 460–467 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-01941-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-019-01941-w