Skip to main content
Log in

Patients’ knowledge about the outcomes of thyroid biopsy: a patient survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid is an increasingly common outpatient procedure. Patients are counseled about the indications and risks of this procedure and informed consent is obtained. We aimed to assess the extent to which patients acquired necessary knowledge during this process.

Methods

Survey study conducted in a thyroid nodule clinic at a referral center. Adult patients who had just undergone a thyroid biopsy were asked to complete a survey, including eight questions regarding the indications and potential outcomes of thyroid biopsy. The main outcome of the study was to assess the patients’ knowledge based on the response to each individual survey question.

Results

Two-hundred and ninety-seven patients were eligible, of which 196 (66%) completed the survey: most were women (76%), had adequate reading health literacy (95%) and a mean age of 58 years. Although 86% of patients correctly identified evaluation for thyroid cancer as the main indication for their biopsy, 56% were not aware of the likelihood of this diagnosis. Almost all (>90%) of respondents knew that results could be benign or malignant; fewer were aware of non-diagnostic (71%) or indeterminate (68%) outcomes, or of the need for additional diagnostic testing after the biopsy (33%).

Conclusions

After undergoing thyroid biopsy, a high proportion of well-educated patients remained unaware of their risk for thyroid cancer, potential outcomes, and downstream consequences of their biopsy. This quality gap raises the possibility that informed consent procedures that meet legal standards may leave patients undergoing thyroid biopsy paradoxically uninformed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.R. Haugen, E.K. Alexander, K.C. Bible, G.M. Doherty, S.J. Mandel, Y.E. Nikiforov, F. Pacini, G.W. Randolph, A.M. Sawka, M. Schlumberger, K.G. Schuff, S.I. Sherman, J.A. Sosa, D.L. Steward, R.M. Tuttle, L. Wartofsky, 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 26(1), 1–133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. J.A. Sosa, J.W. Hanna, K.A. Robinson, R.B. Lanman, Increases in thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirations, operations, and diagnoses of thyroid cancer in the United States. Surgery 154(6), 1420–1426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bongiovanni, A. Spitale, W.C. Faquin, L. Mazzucchelli, Z.W. Baloch, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol. 56(4), 333–339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1159/000339959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Singh Ospina, J.P. Brito, S. Maraka, A.E. Espinosa de Ycaza, R. Rodriguez-Gutierrez, M.R. Gionfriddo, A. Castaneda-Guarderas, K. Benkhadra, A. Al Nofal, P. Erwin, J.C. Morris, M.R. Castro, V.M. Montori, Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 53(3), 651–661 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-0921-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Singh Ospina, S. Maraka, A.E. Espinosa de Ycaza, J.P. Brito, M.R. Castro, J.C. Morris, V.M: Montori, Prognosis of patients with benign thyroid nodules: a population-based study. Endocrine 54(1), 148–155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-0967-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Rodriguez-Gutierrez, M.R. Gionfriddo, N.S. Ospina, S. Maraka, S. Tamhane, V.M. Montori, J.P. Brito, Shared decision-making in endocrinology: present and future directions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4(8), 706–716 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00468-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. N.S. Morris, C.D. MacLean, L.D. Chew, B. Littenberg, The Single Item Literacy Screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC Fam. Pract. 7, 21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. G.B. Willis, A.R. Artino Jr., What do our respondents think we’re asking? using cognitive interviewing to improve medical education surveys. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 5(3), 353–356 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-13-00154.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. P.A. Harris, R. Taylor, R. Thielke, J. Payne, N. Gonzalez, J.G. Conde, Research electronic data capture (REDCap) a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 42(2), 377–381 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SAS Institute Inc, C., NC.: JUMP. In. (1989–2007)

  11. H.B. Burch, K.D. Burman, D.S. Cooper, J.V. Hennessey, N.O. Vietor, A 2015 Survey of Clinical Practice Patterns in the Management of Thyroid Nodules. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 101(7), 2853–2862 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-1155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. B.A. Taylor, R.D. Hart, M.H. Rigby, J. Trites, S.M. Taylor, P. Hong, Decisional conflict in patients considering diagnostic thyroidectomy with indeterminate fine needle aspirate cytopathology. J. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg. 45, 16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0130-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Abdul-Sater, M. Henry, A. Majdan, T. Mijovic, J.H. Franklin, M.G. Brandt, M.J. Black, M.P. Hier, R.J. Payne, What are thyroidectomy patients really concerned about? Otolaryngol. Head. Neck. Surg. 144(5), 685–690 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811399556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. M.B. Rothberg, S.K. Sivalingam, J. Ashraf, P. Visintainer, J. Joelson, R. Kleppel, N. Vallurupalli, M.J. Schweiger, Patients’ and cardiologists’ perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 153(5), 307–313 (2010). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-5-201009070-00005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Kunneman, V.M. Montori, When patient-centred care is worth doing well: informed consent or shared decision-making. BMJ Qual. Saf. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005969

  16. E.S. Spatz, H.M. Krumholz, B.W. Moulton, The new era of informed consent: Getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. JAMA 315(19), 2063–2064 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.3070

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Z.D. Berger, J.P. Brito, N.S. Ospina, S. Kannan, J.S. Hinson, E.P. Hess, H. Haskell, V.M. Montori, D.E. Newman-Toker, Patient centred diagnosis: sharing diagnostic decisions with patients in clinical practice. BMJ 359, j4218 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This publication was made possible by CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Juan P. Brito is supported by the Karl-Erivan Haub Family Career Development Award in Cancer Research at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, honoring Richard F. Emslander, M.D. Spyridoula Maraka is supported by the Arkansas Biosciences Institute, the major research component of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act of 2000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor M. Montori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards and with approval of the institutional research board.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh Ospina, N., Castaneda-Guarderas, A., Ward, R. et al. Patients’ knowledge about the outcomes of thyroid biopsy: a patient survey. Endocrine 61, 482–488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1639-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1639-8

Keywords

Navigation