Abstract
Selenium (Se) content of feedstuffs is dependent on the Se level of the soil. Even though Se in grass and forage crops is primarily present in organic forms, Se is commonly supplemented in cattle diets in an inorganic (sodium selenite) form in geographic regions where Se soil concentrations are low. The purpose of this study was to answer two important questions about inorganic (ISe) vs organic (OSe) forms of dietary supplementation of Se (3 mg/day) to growing beef heifers (0.5 kg/day): (1) what would the effect of supplementing Se with an equal blend of ISe:OSe (Mix) have on Se tissue concentrations and (2) how long does it take for the greater assimilation with OSE to occur and stabilize? A long-term (224 day) Se dietary supplementation trial was conducted with serial sampling performed (days 28, 56, 112, and 224) to determine the length of time required to achieve Se supplement (OSE, Mix, and ISe)-dependent changes in Se assimilation in blood fractions and liver tissue. Forty maturing Angus heifers were fed a corn silage-based diet for 98 days with no Se supplementation, and then a cracked corn/cottonseed hull-based diet (basal diet) without Se supplementation for 74 days. Liver biopsies were taken for Se analysis, and heifers were fed the same diet for another 14 days. Heifers were assigned (n = 10) to one of four Se treatment groups such that basal liver Se contents were stratified among groups, and then fed enough of the basal diet (0.08 mg Se per day) and a mineral–vitamin mix that provided 0.16 (control) or 3.0 mg Se per day in ISe (sodium selenite), OSe (Sel-Plex®), or Mix (1:1 ISe:OSe) form to support 0.5 kg/day growth for 224 days. More Se was found in whole blood, red blood cells, serum, and liver of Mix and OSe heifers than ISe heifers, and all were greater than control. Se content either increased until day 56 then was stable (liver and plasma), or was stable until day 56 (whole blood) or day 112 (red blood cells) and then increased steadily through day 224, for all supplemental Se treatments. These data indicate that a 1:1 mix (1.5 mg Se:1.5 mg Se) of supplemental ISe and OSe is equal to 3 mg/day OSe supplementation and greater than 3 mg/day ISe supplementation. The data also indicate that Se levels stabilized in liver and plasma by 56 to 112 days whereas whole blood and red blood cell concentrations were still increasing through 224 days of supplementation, regardless of the form of supplemental Se.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- ISe:
-
Inorganic selenium
- OSe:
-
Organic selenium
- Se:
-
Selenium
References
National Research Council (1996) Minerals. In: Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 54–74
Surai PF (2006) Selenium in ruminant nutrition. In: Selenium in nutrition and health. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 487–587
Ammerman CB, Miller SM (1975) Selenium in ruminant nutrition: a review. J Dairy Sci 58:1561–1577
Dargatz DA, Ross PF (1996) Blood selenium concentrations in cows and heifers on 253 cow-calf operations in 18 states. J Anim Sci 74:2891–2895
Food and Drug Administration (1987) Food additives permitted in feed and drinking water of animals: selenium. Fed Reg 52:10668
Schrauzer (2003) The nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicology of selenomethionine. Adv Food Nutr Res 47:73–112
Liao SF, Brown KR, Stromberg AJ, Burris WR, Boling JA, Matthews JC (2011) Dietary supplementation of selenium in inorganic and organic forms differentially and commonly alters blood and liver selenium concentrations and liver gene expression profiles of growing beef heifers. Biol Trace Elem Res 140:151–169, doi:10.1007/s12011-010-8685-2.
Ehlig CF, Hogue DE, Allaway WH, Hamm DJ (1967) Fate of selenium from selenite or seleno-methionine, with or without vitamin e, in lambs. J Nutr 92:121–126
Aspila P (1991) Metabolism of selenite, selenomethionine and feed incorporated selenium in lactating goats and dairy cows. J Agric Sci Finland 63:1–74
Juniper DT, Phipps RH, Ramos-Morales E, Bertin G (2008) Effect of dietary supplementation with selenium-enriched yeast or sodium selenite on selenium tissue distribution and meat quality in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 86:3100–3109
Ortman K, Pehrson B (1997) Selenite and selenium yeast as feed supplements for dairy cows. J Vet Med A 44:373–380
Slavik P, Illek J, Brix M, Hlavicova J, Rajmon R, Jilek F (2008) Influence of organic versus inorganic dietary selenium supplementation on the concentration of selenium in colostrum, milk and blood of beef cows. Acta Vet Scand 50:43
Gunter SA, Beck PA, Phillips JK (2003) Effects of supplementary selenium source on the performance and blood measurements in beef cows and their calves. J Anim Sci 81:856–864
Malbe M, Klaassen M, Fang W, Myllys V, Vikerpuur M, Nyholm K, Sankari S, Suoranta K, Sandholm M (1995) Comparisons of selenite and selenium yeast feed supplements on se-incorporation, mastitis and leucocyte function in Se-deficient dairy cows. Zentralbl Veterinärmed A 42:111–121
Behne D, Kyriakopoulos A, Scheid S, Gessner H (1991) Effects of chemical form and dosage on the incorporation of selenium into tissue proteins in rats. J Nutr 121:806–814
National Research Council (1996) Energy. In: Nutrient requirements of beef cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–15
Brown KR, Anderson GA, Son K, Rentfrow G, Bush LP, Klotz JL, Strickland JR, Boling JA, Matthews JC (2009) Growing steers grazing high versus low endophyte (neotyphodium coenophialum)-infected tall fescue have reduced serum enzymes, increased hepatic glucogenic enzymes, and reduced liver and carcass mass. J Anim Sci 87:748–760
Edmondson AJ, Norman BB, Suther D (1993) Survey of state veterinarians and state veterinary diagnostic laboratories for selenium deficiency and toxicosis in animals. JAVMA 202:865–872
Panter KE, Hartley WJ, James LF, Mayland HF, Stegelmeier BL, Kechele PO (1996) Comparative toxicity of selenium from seleno-dl-methionine, sodium selenate, and Astragalus bisulcatus in pigs. Fundam Appl Toxicol 32:217–223
Beilstein MA, Whanger PD (1986) Deposition of dietary organic and inorganic selenium in rat erythrocyte proteins. J Nutr 116:1701–1710
Osman M, Latshaw JD (1976) Biological potency of selenium from sodium selenite, selenomethionine, and selenocystine in the chick. Poult Sci 55:987–994
Cary EE, Allaway WH, Miller M (1973) Utilization of different forms of dietary selenium. J Anim Sci 36:285–292
Pehrson B, Knutson M, Gyllensward M (1989) Glutathione peroxidase activity in heifers fed diet supplemented with organic and inorganic selenium compounds. Swedish J Agric Res 19:53–56
Gerloff BJ (1992) Effect of selenium supplementation on dairy cattle. J Anim Sci 70:3934–3940
Hogan JS, Weiss WP, Smith KL (1993) Role of vitamin e and selenium in host defense against mastitis. J Dairy Sci 76:2795–2803
Smith L, Hogan JS, Conrad HR (1988) Selenium in dairy cattle: its role in disease resistance. Vet Med 83:72–78
Ullrey DE (1987) Biochemical and physiological indicators of selenium status in animals. J Anim Sci 65:1712–1726
Corah LR (1996) Trace mineral requirements of grazing cattle. Anim Feed Sci Tech 59:61–70
Bierla K, Dernovics M, Vacchina V, Szpunar J, Bertin G, Lobinski R (2008) Determination of selenocysteine and selenomethionine in edible animal tissues by 2D size-exclusion reversed-phase HPLC-ICP MS following carbamidomethylation and proteolytic extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem 390:1789–1798
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Alltech-University of Kentucky Nutrigenomics Alliance (JCM), University of Kentucky, Alltech Inc., and Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station (publication no. 10-07-135).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brennan, K.M., Burris, W.R., Boling, J.A. et al. Selenium Content in Blood Fractions and Liver of Beef Heifers Is Greater with a Mix of Inorganic/Organic or Organic Versus Inorganic Supplemental Selenium but the Time Required for Maximal Assimilation Is Tissue-Specific. Biol Trace Elem Res 144, 504–516 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-9069-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-9069-y