Abstract
The effect of sludge retention time (SRT) on biomass, kinetic parameters, and stoichiometric parameters of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2O) process were explored in this study. The results showed that the growth rate constants were 1.52, 1.22, and 0.85 day−1, respectively, for AOB, those were 1.59, 1.19, and 0.87 day−1, respectively, for NOB when SRT was 20, 10, and 5 days. The lysis rate constants of AOB and NOB were 0.14 and 0.09 day−1, respectively. The yield coefficients were 0.23 and 0.22, respectively, for AOB and NOB. They did not change with SRT obviously. The biomass of AOB was 50.94, 26.35, and 14.68 mg L−1, respectively, and the biomass of NOB was 116.77, 60.00, and 44.25 mg L−1, respectively, at SRT of 20, 10, and 5 days. When SRT diminished from 20 to 5 days, the biomass of AOB and NOB diminished by 36.26 and 75.52 mg L−1, respectively. The removal efficiency of NH4 +–N diminished by 68.9 %. The removal efficiency of total nitrogen diminished by 42.9 %.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- b AOB :
-
Lysis rate constant of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (1/T)
- b NOB :
-
Lysis rate constant of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (1/T)
- OURAOB :
-
Oxygen uptake rate of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (M/T L3)
- OURH :
-
Oxygen uptake rate of heterotrophic bacteria (M/T L3)
- OURNOB :
-
Oxygen uptake rate of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (M/T L3)
- S NH4 :
-
Concentration of ammonia (M/L3)
- S NO2 :
-
Concentration of nitrite (M/L3)
- S O2 :
-
Concentration of oxygen (M/L3)
- X AOB :
-
Concentration of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (M/L3)
- X NOB :
-
Concentration of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (M/L3)
- Y AOB :
-
Yield coefficient of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria
- Y NOB :
-
Yield coefficient of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria
- μ AOB :
-
Growth rate constant of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (1/T)
- μ NOB :
-
Growth rate constant of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (1/T)
References
Tung, Y. T., & Pai, T. Y. (2014). Water management for agriculture, energy and social security in Taiwan. CLEAN Soil Air Water. doi:10.1002/clen.201300275.
Gao, D., Li, Z., Guan, J., Li, Y., & Ren, N. (2014). Removal of surfactants nonylphenol ethoxylates from municipal sewage-comparison of an A/O process and biological aerated filters. Chemosphere, 97, 130–134.
Pai, T. Y., Ouyang, C. F., Su, J. L., & Leu, H. G. (2001). Modelling the steady-state effluent characteristics of the TNCU process under different return mixed liquid. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 25, 1025–1038.
Pai, T. Y., Tsai, Y. P., Chou, Y. J., Chang, H. Y., Leu, H. G., & Ouyang, C. F. (2004). Microbial kinetic analysis of three different types of EBNR process. Chemosphere, 55, 109–118.
Pai, T. Y., Chuang, S. H., Tsai, Y. P., & Ouyang, C. F. (2004). Modelling a combined anaerobic/anoxic oxide and rotating biological contactors process under dissolved oxygen variation by using an activated sludge - biofilm hybrid model. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 130, 1433–1441.
Pai, T. Y. (2007). Modeling nitrite and nitrate variations in A2O process under different return oxic mixed liquid using an extended model. Process Biochemistry, 42, 978–987.
Zafiriadis, I., Ntougias, S., Kapagiannidis, A. G., & Aivasidis, A. (2013). Metabolic behavior and enzymatic aspects of denitrifying EBPR sludge in a continuous-flow anaerobic–anoxic system. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 171, 939–953.
Cetecioglu, Z., Ince, B., Azman, S., & Ince, O. (2014). Biodegradation of tetracycline under various conditions and effects on microbial community. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 172, 631–640.
Yang, Y., Huang, S., Zhang, Y., & Xu, F. (2014). Nitrogen removal by Chelatococcus daeguensis TAD1 and its denitrification gene identification. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 172, 829–839.
Sollfrank, U., & Gujer, W. (1991). Characterization of domestic wastewater for mathematical modeling of the activated sludge process. Water Science and Technology, 23, 1057–1066.
Kappeler, J., & Gujer, W. (1992). Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modelling. Water Science and Technology, 25, 125–139.
Pai, T. Y., Wang, S. C., Lo, H. M., Chiang, C. F., Liu, M. H., Chiou, R. J., Chen, W. Y., Hung, P. S., Liao, W. C., & Leu, H. G. (2009). Novel modeling concept for evaluating the effects of cadmium and copper on heterotrophic growth and lysis rates in activated sludge process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 166, 200–206.
Pai, T. Y., Chang, H. Y., Wan, T. J., Chuang, S. H., & Tsai, Y. P. (2009). Using an extended activated sludge model to simulate nitrite and nitrate variations in TNCU2 process. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33, 4259–4268.
Pai, T. Y., Wang, S. C., Lin, C. Y., Liao, W. C., Chu, H. H., Lin, T. S., Liu, C. C., & Lin, S. W. (2009). Two types of organophosphate pesticides and their combined effects on heterotrophic growth rates in activated sludge process. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 84, 1773–1779.
Pai, T. Y., Wan, T. J., Tsai, Y. P., Tzeng, C. J., Chu, H. H., Tsai, Y. S., & Lin, C. Y. (2010). Effect of sludge retention time on nitrifiers’ biomass and kinetics in an anaerobic/oxic process. CLEAN Soil Air Water, 38, 167–172.
Pai, T. Y., Chiou, R. J., Tzeng, C. J., Lin, T. S., Yeh, S. C., Sung, P. J., Tseng, C. H., Tsai, C. H., Tsai, Y. S., Hsu, W. J., & Wei, Y. L. (2010). Variation of biomass and kinetic parameter for nitrifying species in TNCU3 process at different aerobic hydraulic retention time. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 26, 589–597.
Pai, T. Y., Chen, C. L., Chung, H., Ho, H. H., & Shiu, T. W. (2010). Monitoring and assessing variation of sewage quality and microbial functional groups in a trunk sewer line. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 171, 551–560.
Pai, T. Y., Shyu, G. S., Chen, L., Lo, H. M., Chang, D. H., Lai, W. J., Yang, P. Y., Chen, C. Y., Liao, Y. C., & Tseng, S. C. (2013). Modelling transportation and transformation of nitrogen compounds at different influent concentrations in sewer pipe. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 1553–1563.
APHA, AWWA, WEF. (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation.
Kappeler, J., & Brodmann, R. (1995). Low F/M bulking and scumming: towards a better understanding by modeling. Water Science and Technology, 31, 225–324.
Nowak, O., Svardal, K., & Schweighofer, P. (1995). The dynamic behaviour of nitrifying activated sludge systems8 influenced by inhibiting wastewater compounds. Water Science and Technology, 31, 115–124.
Wijffels, R. H., de Gooijer, C. D., Schepers, A. W., Beuling, E. E., Mallee, L. F., & Tramper, J. (1995). Dynamic modeling of immobilized Nitrosomonas europaea: implementation of diffusion limitation over expanding microcolonies. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 17, 462–471.
Tartakovsky, B., Kotlar, E., & Sheintuch, M. (1996). Coupled nitrification-denitrification processes in a mixed culture of coimmobilized cells: Analysis and experiment. Chemical Engineering Science, 51, 2327–2336.
Pérez, J., Poughon, L., Dussap, C., & Montesinos, J. L. (2005). Dynamics and steady state operation of a nitrifying fixed bed biofilm reactor: mathematical model based description. Process Biochemistry, 40, 2359–2369.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the National Science Council of R.O.C. for financial support under the grant number NSC 97-2221-E-324-048.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pai, TY., Lo, HM., Wan, TJ. et al. Behaviors of Biomass and Kinetic Parameter for Nitrifying Species in A2O Process at Different Sludge Retention Time. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174, 2875–2885 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1233-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1233-3