Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative evaluation of human interaction for design and assembly of 3D CAD models in desktop and immersive environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computer aided design (CAD) systems have become today the basic tools used to design and develop products in the industry. In current CAD software most of the editing commands are issued with the aid of widgets and alphanumeric data input devices, while research community is proposing the use of virtual reality environments for CAD modelling. This paper presents an experimental study which compares the performance and usability of a multimodal immersive VR (virtual reality)-CAD system with a traditional CAD system. A comparative analysis was done for the modelling and the assembling process of 3D models. The results obtained from this investigation have shown that, in spite of the variety of interface devices in the virtual environment which provide a natural interaction to the user, the modelling time is about the same compared with a traditional desktop interface. The assembling time, however, is shown to be much smaller for multimodal system. Furthermore, the multimodal interface poses a higher physical stress factor, the hand movement distance being on average 1.6–2.3 times greater than the desktop interface for modelling process and assembling process, respectively. A post-experiment questionnaire shows that the multimodal system produce a great satisfaction for users in modelling and assembly processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arangarasan, R., Gadh, R.: Geometric modeling and collaborative design in a multi-modal multi-sensory virtual environment. In: Proceedings of DETC’00, ASME2000 Conferences, Baltimore, September 10–13 (2000)

  2. Backstrand G., Hogberg D., De Vin L., Case K., Piamonte P.: Ergonomics analysis in a virtual environment. Int. J. Manufact. Res. 2(2), 198–208 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balaji C., Stone R., McAdams D.: Developing design templates for product platform focused design. J. Eng. Des. 15(3), 209–228 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berta J.: Integrating VR and CAD. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 19(5), 14–19 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bitmanagement BS Contact Stereo: http://www.bitmanagement.com

  6. Blackler A., Popovic V., Mahar D.: The nature of intuitive use of products: an experimental approach. Des. Stud. 24(6), 491–506 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourdot P., Convard T., Picon F., Ammi M., Touraine D., Vézien M.-J.: VR–CAD integration: multimodal immersive interaction and advanced haptic paradigms for implicit edition of CAD models. Comput. Aided Des. 42(5), 445–461 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlo H.: Séquin: CAD tools for aesthetic engineering. Comput. Aided Des. 37(7), 737–750 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavazza, M., Lugrin, J.-L., Hartley, S., Renard, M.L., Nandi, A., Jacobson, J., Crooks, S.: Intelligent virtual environments for virtual reality art. Comput. Graphics (2005, in press)

  10. Chamaret, D., Richard, P.: Multimodal prop-based interaction with virtual mock-up: CAD model integration and human performance evaluation. In: ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology 2008, Bordeaux, France (2008)

  11. Chu C., Mo J., Gadh R.: A quantitative analysis on virtual reality-based computer aided design system interfaces. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 2, 216–223 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dani T.H., Gadh R.: COVIRDS: a conceptual virtual design system. Comput. Aided Des. 29(8), 555–563 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Amicis, R., Bruno, F., Stork, A., Luchi, M.L.: The eraser pen: a new interaction paradigm for curve sketching in 3D. In: Design 2002, vol. 46, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 14–17 (2002)

  14. Deisinger, J., Breining, R., Rosler, A., Ruckert, D., Hofle, J.: Immersive ergonomic analyses of console elements in a tractor cabin. In: 4th International Immersive Projection Technology Workshop Proceedings, Ames, Iowa, USA (2000)

  15. Dellisanti, M., Fiorentino, M., Monno, G., Uva, A.E.: Flexible multimodal architecture for CAD application. In: Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, Trento (2007)

  16. DIN EN ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office with Visual Display Terminals—Guidance on Usability, Beuth, Berlin (1998)

  17. Eves G.: Virtual Reality Based Training for Industry, a Cognitive Process Approach. VR Solutions, Australia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fiorentino, M., de Amicis, R., Stork, A. Monno, G.: Spacedesign: a mixed reality workspace for aesthetic industrial design. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Washington, DC, pp. 86–94 (2002)

  19. Gaggioli, A., Breining, R.: Perception and Cognition in Immersive Virtual Reality. In: Riva, G., Davide, F. (eds.) Communications through virtual technology: identity community and Technology in the Internet Age. IOS Press, Amsterdam, NL (2001)

  20. Girbacia, F., Runde, C., Butnaru, T., Sisca, S., Talaba, D.: An interactive multi wall projected virtual environment for virtual reality based design and manufacturing simulation. In: 12th International Conference on Machine Design and Production, Kusadasi, Turkey (2006)

  21. Gruchalla, K.: Immersive well-path editing: investigating the added value of immersion. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, Chicago, IL, pp. 157–164, 27–31 March 2004

  22. Hacker W.: Action regulation theory and occupational psychology, review of German empirical research since 1987. German J. Psychol. 18(2), 91–120 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Igarashi, T., Matsuoka, S., Teddy, T.H.: A sketching interface for 3D freeform design. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ’99, Los Angels, pp. 409–416 (1999)

  24. Ingrassia T., Cappello F.: Virtual reality approaches for immersive designVirDe: a new virtual reality design approach. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manufact. 3, 1–11 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ISO/DIS 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTS), Part 11: Guidance on Usability, International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland (1997)

  26. Jezernik A., Hren G.: A solution to integrate computer-aided design (CAD) and virtual reality (VR) databases in design and manufacturing processes. Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol. 22, 768–774 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Keefe, D.F., Acevedo Feliz, D., Moscovich, T., Laidlaw, D.H., LaViola, J.: CavePainting: a fully immersive 3D artistic medium and interactive experience. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (SI3D’01), Chapel Hill, NC, pp. 85–93, 26–29 March 2001

  28. Keefe, D.F., Acevedo, D., Miles, J., Drury, F., Swartz, S., Laidlaw, D.: Scientific sketching for collaborative VR visualization design. IEEE Transact. Vis. Comput. Graphics (2008)

  29. Keskin, C., Erkan, A., Akarun, L.: Real time hand tracking and 3D gesture recognition for interactive interfaces using Hmm. In: Proceedings ICANN/ICONIPP 2003, Istanbul (2003)

  30. Kok A.J.F., van Liere R.: A multimodal virtual reality interface for 3D interaction with VTK. J. Knowl. Inform. Syst. 13(2), 197–219 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Krause, F.L., Gobel, M., et al.: A three-stage conceptual design process using virtual environments. In: WSCG’2004 Poster Proceedings, Plzen, Czech Republic, 2–6 February 2004

  32. Laviola, J.J.J.: MSVT: a virtual reality-based multimodal scientific visualization tool. In: IASTED 1999 International Conference on Computer Graphics and Imaging, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (1999)

  33. Leu M.C. et al.: Creation of freeform solid models in virtual reality. CIRP Ann. 50(1), 73–77 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma, S.-Q., Gao, Z.-L.: A solution to integrate CAD/CAE system and VR for complex product design processes. In: 2009 2nd International on Information and Computing Science, Manchester, England, pp. 331–333, 21–22 May 2009

  35. Mizell, D., Jones, S., Slater, M., Spanlang, B.: Comparing Immersive Virtual Reality with Other Display Modes for Visualizing Complex 3D Geometry (Report for EPSRC Grant GR/M86200/01) (2000)

  36. Moustakas, K., Tzovaras, D., et al: MASTER-PIECE: a multimodal (gesture + speech) interface for 3D model search and retrieval integrated in a virtual assembly application. In: Proceedings of the eNTERFACE 2005, Mons, Belgium, pp. 62–75 (2005)

  37. NaturalPoint Optitrack Full Body Motion Capture: http://www.naturalpoint.com/optitrack/products/motion-capture

  38. Naumann A., Hurtienne J., Israel J.H., Mohs C., Kindsmüller M.C., Meyer H.A., Hußlein S.: Intuitive use of user interfaces: defining a vague concept. In: Harris, D. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, HCII 2007, pp. 128–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Neugebauer, R., Weidlich, D., Zickner, H.: Virtual reality aided design of parts and assemblies. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manufact. 1(1), 15–20 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nichols S.: Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use. J. Appl. Ergon. 30(1), 79–90 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Oliver, J., Kuehne, R.: A virtual environment for interactive assembly planning and evaluation. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Automation Conference, Boston, MA, pp. 863–867 (1995)

  42. Johansson P., Ynnerman A.: Immersive visual interface-assesing usability by the effects of learning/results from an empirical study. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 4(2), 124–131 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pache M., Lindemann U.: Sketching in 3D. What should future tools for conceptual design looklike?. In: Lindemann, U. (eds) Human Behaviour in Design: Individuals, Teams, Tools, pp. 243–252. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Prabhat F. et al.: A comparative study of desktop, fishtank, and cave systems for the exploration of volume rendered confocal data sets. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 14(3), 551–563 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu Q., Sun S., Dong Z.: A computer-aided ergonomics evaluation system for customized furniture design. Adv. Mater. Res. 102–104, 890–894 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Raposo, A., Corseuil, E., Wagner, G., Santos, I., Gattass, M.: Towards the use of cad models in VR applications. In: VRCAI 2006 ACM Virtual Reality Continuum and its Applications, Hong Kong, China (2006)

  47. Raposo A., Santos I., Soares L., Wagner G., Corseuil E., Gattass M.: Environ: integrating VR and CAD in engineering projects. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 29(6), 91–95 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosenbaum D.A.: The cinderella of psychology: the neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. Am. Psychol. 60, 308317 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Santos P., Stork A., Gierlinger T., Pagani A., Paloc C., Barandarian I., Conti G., de Amicis R., Witzel M., Machui O., Jiménez J., Araujo B., Jorge J., Bodammer G.: IMPROVE: an innovative application for collaborative mobile mixed reality design review. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manufact. 1(3), 115–126 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sarah L., Henning B., Kocha I.: Anticipatory movement compatibility for virtual reality interaction devices. Behav. Inform. Technol. 29(2), 165–174 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shena Y., Ong S.K., Neea A.Y.C.: Augmented reality for collaborative product design and development. Des. Stud. 31(2), 118–145 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharon O.: Breaking the robustness barrier: recent progress on the design of robust multimodal systems. Adv. Comput. 56, 305–341 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sousa Santos, B., Paulo Dias, A. Pimentel, Baggerman, J.W., Ferreira, C., Silva, S., Madeira, J.: Head mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: a user study. Multimed. Tools Appl. 41, 161–181 (2010)

  54. Spool, J.M.: What makes a design seem ’intuitive’? http://www.uie.com/articles/design_intuitive/ (2005). Accessed 25 Nov 2011

  55. Trika, S., Banerjee P., Kashyap, R.L.: Virtual reality interfaces for feature-based computer-aided design systems. Comput. Aided Des. 29(8), 565–574

  56. Walliser, F.-S.: Entwicklung und Nachweisführung einer Methodik zur Einführung und Stabilisierung von veränderten Prozessen in der Produktentwicklung. [Development and verification of a method for implementation and stabilization of changed processes in product development]. Dissertation. http://www.archiv.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/1999/0020/ (1999)

  57. Wan, H., Gao, S., Peng, Q., Dai, G., Zhang, F.: MIVAS: a multi-modal immersive virtual assembly system. In: ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, vol. 4, pp. 113–122 (2004)

  58. Wang, Q.H., Li, J.R.: A desktop VR prototype for industrial training applications. J. Virtual Real. 7(3), 187–197 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Weidlich D., Cser L., Polzin T., Cristiano D., Zickner H.: Virtual reality approaches for immersive design. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manufact. 3, 103–108 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. SolidWorks Corporation: http://www.solidworks.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Transilvania University of Brasov, Bdul. Eroilor 29, 500036, Brasov, Romania

    Mădălina Ioana Toma, Florin Gîrbacia & Csaba Antonya

Authors
  1. Mădălina Ioana Toma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florin Gîrbacia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Csaba Antonya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mădălina Ioana Toma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toma, M.I., Gîrbacia, F. & Antonya, C. A comparative evaluation of human interaction for design and assembly of 3D CAD models in desktop and immersive environments. Int J Interact Des Manuf 6, 179–193 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0144-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0144-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation