Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Dilemma of Adolescent Varicoceles: Do They Really Have to Be Repaired?

  • Pediatric Urology (D Weiss, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Urology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary indication for varicocele repair in adults, that of failed paternity, must be substituted in the adolescent population with surrogate parameters of testicular size differential and semen analysis. Making recommendations based on these two parameters is incredibly difficult because studies often have contradictory findings, different patient populations, and lack of long-term follow up of the key endpoint, paternity. Therefore, it is not a surprise that recommendations for adolescent varicocele repair are general (with some exceptions) and necessarily so because of limitations in quality of evidence. Apart from pain, all indications for varicocele repair in adolescence remain controversial. This highlights the most important task for future studies: to prevent pediatric urologists from allowing a potentially damaging process to go untreated, while at the same time avoiding unnecessary intervention on a highly prevalent condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Papavramidou NS, Christopoulou-Aletras H. Treatment of "hernia" in the writings of Celsus (first century AD). World J Surg. 2005;29(10):1343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Noske HD, Weidner W. Varicocele—a historical perspective. World J Urol. 1999;17(3):151–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kendirci M, Kadioglu A, Boylu U, Miroglu C. Urogenital surgery of the 15th century in Anatolia. J Urol. 2005;173(6):1879–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tulloch WS. Varicocele in subfertility; results of treatment. Br Med J. 1955;2(4935):356–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. • Roque M, Esteves SC. A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the diagnosis and management of varicocele in children and adolescents. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):262–8. This review illustrates the rather general recommendations from different organizations and guidelines around the world.

  6. Alsaikhan B, Alrabeeah K, Delouya G, Zini A. Epidemiology of varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):179–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Oster J. Varicocele in children and adolescents. An investigation of the incidence among Danish school children. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1971;5(1):27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shridharani A, Lockwood G, Sandlow J. Varicocelectomy in the treatment of testicular pain: a review. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22(6):499–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Han DY, Yang QY, Chen X, et al. Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(7):1071–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. World Health Organization. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(6):1289–1293.

  11. •• Bogaert G, Orye C, De Win G. Pubertal screening and treatment for varicocele do not improve chance of paternity as adult. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2298–303. This study provides the only available data on paternity in adolescent varicocele patients. A good example of the type of longitudinal data we need more of.

  12. Vanlangenhove P, Dhondt E, Van Maele G, Van Waesberghe S, Delanghe E, Defreyne L. Internal spermatic vein insufficiency in varicoceles: a different entity in adults and adolescents? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(3):667–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jargiello T, Drelich-Zbroja A, Falkowski A, Sojka M, Pyra K, Szczerbo-Trojanowska M. Endovascular transcatheter embolization of recurrent postsurgical varicocele: anatomic reasons for surgical failure. Acta Radiol. 2015;56(1):63–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tilki D, Kilic E, Tauber R, et al. The complex structure of the smooth muscle layer of spermatic veins and its potential role in the development of varicocele testis. Eur Urol. 2007;51(5):1402–9. discussion 1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Durairajanayagam D, Agarwal A, Ong C. Causes, effects and molecular mechanisms of testicular heat stress. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30(1):14–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thonneau P, Bujan L, Multigner L, Mieusset R. Occupational heat exposure and male fertility: a review. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(8):2122–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstein M, Eid JF. Elevation of intratesticular and scrotal skin surface temperature in men with varicocele. J Urol. 1989;142(3):743–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mieusset R, Bujan L. Testicular heating and its possible contributions to male infertility: a review. Int J Androl. 1995;18(4):169–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanter M, Aktas C. Effects of scrotal hyperthermia on Leydig cells in long-term: a histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study in rats. J Mol Histol. 2009;40(2):123–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Romeo C, Santoro G. Free radicals in adolescent varicocele testis. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:912878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abrol N, Panda A, Kekre NS. Painful varicoceles: role of varicocelectomy. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(4):369–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kroese AC, de Lange NM, Collins J, Evers JL. Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000479.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi HM. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011;59(3):455–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chiba K, Fujisawa M. Clinical outcomes of varicocele repair in infertile men: a review. World J Mens Health. 2016;34(2):101–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. British Medical A, Levy A, British MA. Consent, rights, and choices in health care for children and young people. London: BMJ Books; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alkaram A, McCullough A. Varicocele and its effect on testosterone: implications for the adolescent. Transl Androl Urol. 2014;3(4):413–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Goede J, Hack WW, Sijstermans K, et al. Normative values for testicular volume measured by ultrasonography in a normal population from infancy to adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;76(1):56–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kass EJ, Stork BR, Steinert BW. Varicocele in adolescence induces left and right testicular volume loss. BJU Int. 2001;87(6):499–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Paltiel HJ, Diamond DA, Di Canzio J, Zurakowski D, Borer JG, Atala A. Testicular volume: comparison of orchidometer and US measurements in dogs. Radiology. 2002;222(1):114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Diamond DA, Zurakowski D, Bauer SB, et al. Relationship of varicocele grade and testicular hypotrophy to semen parameters in adolescents. J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 2):1584–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Christman MS, Zderic SA, Canning DA, Kolon TF. Active surveillance of the adolescent with varicocele: predicting semen outcomes from ultrasound. J Urol. 2014;191(5):1401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kurtz MP, Zurakowski D, Rosoklija I, et al. Semen parameters in adolescents with varicocele: association with testis volume differential and total testis volume. J Urol. 2015;193(5 Suppl):1843–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chu DI, Zderic SA, Shukla AR, et al. The natural history of semen parameters in untreated asymptomatic adolescent varicocele patients: a retrospective cohort study. J Pediatr Urol. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.09.008.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kolon TF, Clement MR, Cartwright L, et al. Transient asynchronous testicular growth in adolescent males with a varicocele. J Urol. 2008;180(3):1111–4. discussion 1114-1115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Khasnavis S, Kogan BA. Natural history of testicular size in boys with varicoceles. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(3):148 e141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seimens Medical Solutions USA I. Acuson Sequoia Ultrasound Systems User Manuel. 2006.

  37. Kurtz MP, Migliozzi M, Rosoklija I, Zurakowski D, Diamond DA. Accuracy of orchidometry in boys with varicocele. J Pediatr Urol. 2015; doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.02.011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Diamond DA, Kurtz MP. Re: Evaluation and Management of the Adolescent Varicocele: T. F. Kolon J Urol 2015; 194: 1194–1201. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 1):1173–1175.

  39. Christman MS, Zderic SA, Kolon TF. Comparison of testicular volume differential calculations in adolescents with varicoceles. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):396–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li F, Chiba K, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on testicular volume in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Urology. 2012;79(6):1340–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spinelli C, Di Giacomo M, Lo Piccolo R, Martin A, Messineo A. The role of testicular volume in adolescents with varicocele: the better way and time of surgical treatment. J Urol. 2010;184(4 Suppl):1722–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kocvara R, Dolezal J, Hampl R, et al. Division of lymphatic vessels at varicocelectomy leads to testicular oedema and decline in testicular function according to the LH-RH analogue stimulation test. Eur Urol. 2003;43(4):430–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(3):231–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Janczewski Z, Bablok L. Semen characteristics in pubertal boys. III. Semen quality and somatosexual development. Arch Androl. 1985;15(2–3):213–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Keene DJ, Fitzgerald CT, Cervellione RM. Sperm concentration and forward motility are not correlated with age in adolescents with an idiopathic varicocele and symmetrical testicular volumes. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51(2):293–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Keene DJ, Sajad Y, Rakoczy G, Cervellione RM. Testicular volume and semen parameters in patients aged 12 to 17 years with idiopathic varicocele. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(2):383–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mori MM, Bertolla RP, Fraietta R, Ortiz V, Cedenho AP. Does varicocele grade determine extent of alteration to spermatogenesis in adolescents? Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1769–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hamilton JA, Cissen M, Brandes M, et al. Total motile sperm count: a better indicator for the severity of male factor infertility than the WHO sperm classification system. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(5):1110–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fine RG, Gitlin J, Reda EF, Palmer LS. Barriers to use of semen analysis in the adolescent with a varicocele: survey of patient, parental, and practitioner attitudes. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(1):41 e41–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Coutinho K, McLeod D, Stensland K, Stock JA. Variations in the management of asymptomatic adolescent grade 2 or 3 left varicoceles: a survey of practitioners. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(3):430–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pastuszak AW, Kumar V, Shah A, Roth DR. Diagnostic and management approaches to pediatric and adolescent varicocele: a survey of pediatric urologists. Urology. 2014;84(2):450–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ku JH, Kim SW, Park K, Paick JS. Benefits of microsurgical repair of adolescent varicocele: comparison of semen parameters in fertile and infertile adults with varicocele. Urology. 2005;65(3):554–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. • Chu DI, Zderic SA, Shukla AR, et al. Does varicocelectomy improve semen analysis outcomes in adolescents without testicular asymmetry? J Pediatr Urol. 2016. The studies by Chu et al. demonstrate the importance to better understand the role of SA in the picture of varicocele pathophysiology: while over 80% of patients had improved TMC postoperatively, only half of patients achieved a normal TMC with repair while in the same cohort spontaneous improvement to normal TMC without repair does also exist.

  54. Yaman O, Ozdiler E, Anafarta K, Gogus O. Effect of microsurgical subinguinal varicocele ligation to treat pain. Urology. 2000;55(1):107–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen SS. Factors predicting symptomatic relief by varicocelectomy in patients with normospermia and painful varicocele nonresponsive to conservative treatment. Urology. 2012;80(3):585–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Park HJ, Lee SS, Park NC. Predictors of pain resolution after varicocelectomy for painful varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(5):754–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Konforte D, Shea JL, Kyriakopoulou L, et al. Complex biological pattern of fertility hormones in children and adolescents: a study of healthy children from the CALIPER cohort and establishment of pediatric reference intervals. Clin Chem. 2013;59(8):1215–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Li F, Yue H, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of surgical repair on testosterone production in infertile men with varicocele: a meta-analysis. Int J Urol. 2012;19(2):149–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hanna GB, Byrne D, Townell N. Right-sided varicocele as a presentation of right renal tumours. Br J Urol. 1995;75(6):798–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wilms G, Oyen R, Casselman J, Peene P, Steeno O, Baert AL. Solitary or predominantly right-sided varicocele: a possible sign of situs inversus. Urol Radiol. 1988;9(4):243–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Meij-de Vries A, den Bakker FM, van der Wolf-de Lijster FS, Meijer RW, Goede J, Heij HA. High prevalence of intratesticular varicocele in a post-orchidopexy cohort. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(3):328–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Woldu SL, Van Batavia JP, Poon SA, Raimondi PM, Glassberg KI. Is adolescent varicocelectomy safe after previous inguinal surgery? J Urol. 2010;184(4 Suppl):1716–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Urology, Boston Children’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Bryan S. Sack, Mattias Schäfer & Michael P. Kurtz

  2. Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, Cnopf’sche Kinderklinik, St. Johannis-Muehlgasse 19, 90419, Nuremberg, Germany

    Mattias Schäfer

Authors
  1. Bryan S. Sack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mattias Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael P. Kurtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan S. Sack.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Bryan S. Sack, Mattias Schäfer, and Michael P. Kurtz each declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pediatric Urology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sack, B.S., Schäfer, M. & Kurtz, M.P. The Dilemma of Adolescent Varicoceles: Do They Really Have to Be Repaired?. Curr Urol Rep 18, 38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0686-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0686-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation