Abstract
Purpose of Review
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic, inflammatory condition, primarily affecting the medium and larger arteries. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe GCA in the context of headache and facial pain, based on a case and the available current literature. Understanding the etiology, pathophysiology, the associated conditions, and the differential diagnoses is important in managing GCA.
Recent Findings
In a patient presenting with unilateral facial/head pain with disturbances of vision, GCA should be considered in the differential diagnosis. There is an association of GCA with several comorbid conditions, and infections including coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) infection. Management of GCA primarily depends upon the identification of the affected artery and prompt treatment. Permanent visual loss and other serious complications are associated with GCA.
Summary
GCA is characterized by robust inflammation of large- and medium-sized arteries and marked elevation of systemic mediators of inflammation. An interdisciplinary approach of management involving the pertinent specialties is strongly recommended.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic, inflammatory condition, primarily affecting the medium and larger arteries, usually in patients older than 50 years of age. Permanent loss of vision is one of the most serious complications of the condition. The etiology of GCA is largely unknown; however, the condition has been known to co-exist with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and systemic vasculitis. Biopsy of the affected temporal artery still remains the golden standard for confirmatory diagnosis of GCA when the temporal artery is affected. This narrative review is based on a case of bilateral temporal GCA. Based on an exhaustive literature search, we elaborate on the clinical features, etiopathogenesis, investigations, and management of GCA. We compare the cardinal features present in this case, with the established literature, and also provide a thorough review to differentiate GCA from other similar vasculitis entities.
Case Presentation
History of Present Illness
A 79-year-old South Asian male patient presented with the chief complaints of bilateral headaches, facial pain, bilateral neck and upper limb pain, complete loss of vision in the right eye, and acute partial loss of vision in the left eye.
Onset
The headache was of a sudden onset in the temporal region. The left-sided peri-auricular pain and the neck pain radiating to the arms were of a slow onset.
Location
The bilateral headache was in the temporal region; the facial pain sites were peri-auricular and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) areas bilaterally (right > left). The arm pains were along the entire length of both the arms. The bilateral neck pain radiated to the arms ipsilaterally. The loss of vision was complete in the right eye and partial in the left eye.
Chronicity
The temporal pain and vision loss were acute. The neck pain and the pain radiating to the arms were chronic.
Frequency and Duration
The frequency and duration of the temporal pain were continuous; TMJ and ear pain were intermittent (provoked); the neck pain and the radiating pain occurred intermittently, multiple times a day.
Intensity
The intensity of the temporal pain was 5 to 6 on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 10. The TMJ and ear pain were 4 to 5; neck pain radiating to arms was 3 to 4.
Quality
The temporal pain had a throbbing quality; the TMJ, ear, and neck pains were “dull-aching.”
Temporal Characteristics
The temporal pain was chronic progressive; the TMJ, ear, and neck pain were non-progressive; the visual symptoms were rapidly progressing.
Aggravating Factors
The temporal, TMJ, and ear pain were aggravated by chewing, and the neck and arm pain by neck movements.
Relieving Factors
The temporal pain was unrelenting. The TMJ, ear, neck, and arm pain were relieved by rest.
Response to Past Treatment
None of the chief complaints was responsive to any of the past attempted therapies, the details of which were not available.
Associated Features
The patient complained of claudication upon chewing, paresthesia in the neck and arm with neck movements, complete/partial loss of vision, and scalp tenderness.
Radiation/Referral
The jaw pain radiated to the neck, arms, and the side of the head ipsilaterally. The neck pain radiated to ipsilateral arm.
Association with Sleep
The patient reported poor quality of sleep.
Medical History
He is a known diabetic, hypertensive, and hyperlipidemic, all being managed adequately by medications. Patient takes olmesartan 40 mg OD, sitagliptin 50 mg BD, and rosuvastatin 5 mg OD.
Clinical Examination Findings
All the mandibular movements were within normal limits, but with pain. Cervical range of motion was restricted by approximately 30–40% with moderate pain. Palpation of the temporalis and masseter muscles elicited intense pain, reproducing the patient’s familiar pain and chief complaints of facial/jaw pain bilaterally, by approximately 70%. Temporal artery appeared tortuous on the right, and its pulse was nonpalpable on the right, and feeble on the left. Palpation of the bilateral sternocleidomastoid muscles reproduced the patient’s familiar pain and chief complaints by approximately 50–60%. Fibromyalgia screening was positive. TMJ palpation elicited mild pain of 3 on VAS bilaterally. For vision-related complaints, the patient was promptly referred to an ophthalmologist.
Laboratory Investigations
-
HbA1c = 7.4 (normal value: 4.0–5.6)
-
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) = 94 mm/h (normal value: 0–15)
-
C-reactive protein (CRP) = 131.8 mg/L (normal value: 0.0– 10.0)
-
Total leukocyte count (TLC) and polymorphonuclear leukocyte count were markedly high with reduction in lymphocyte count.
Imaging
Color duplex ultrasonography of the temporal artery showed atherosclerotic vessel wall changes in both temporal arteries. Perivascular hypoechoic halo noted around both superficial temporal arteries, more on the right than the left. These imaging findings are highly suggestive of GCA (Fig. 1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, brain stem and neck, with and without contrast, failed to reveal any of the characteristic features associated with GCA. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the neck vessels and the circle of Willis showed no narrowing, aneurysm, malformations, dissections, or other significant abnormalities.
Histopathology
Biopsy of the right superficial temporal artery showed a narrow lumen with hyperplastic intima layer, focal disruption and fragmentation of the internal elastic lamina, marked thickening of the tunica media with multiple ill-formed granulomas, and concomitant evidence of Monckeberg’s medial sclerosis (MMS). The granulomas were composed of epithelioid cells, lymphocytes, and multinucleated giant cells (Fig. 2). Multiple congested blood vessels, edema, and transmural inflammatory cell inflammation (lymphocytes, plasma cells, and neutrophils) were also seen. These histopathological findings were confirmatory of GCA.
Management
The patient was treated with methylprednisolone starting with 1 g intravenously (IV) once daily (OD) for 5 days, followed by tapered dose from 60 mg, reducing 10 mg weekly. Concomitantly, pantoprazole 40 mg IV and calcium 500 mg OD were administered for 5 days. Patient was scheduled for follow-up every 3 months afterwards.
Complications
This patient had significant complications including complete loss of vision in one eye and partial loss of vision in the other. The diabetic and hypertensive status of the patient posed a challenge in considering corticosteroid therapy for the management of this condition.
Discussion
Definition
Initially described by Hutchinson (1890) and Horton (1932), GCA is a form of autoimmune systemic vasculitis [1, 2]. In GCA, there is an increased incidence of involvement of the temporal arteries [3]; however, GCA is a systemic disease . GCA is defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) as a type of vasculitis or arteritis a group of diseases whose main feature is inflammation of the blood vessels. The 2018 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) is largely in consensus with the ACR criteria [4•]. A recent international consensus describes GCA as a granulomatous arteritis [5].
Synonyms
-
Horton’s disease [3]
-
Cranial arteritis [10]
-
Polymyalgia arteritica [8]
-
Arteritis of the aged [12]
-
Anarthritic rheumatoid disease, Pulseless disease [12]
Classification Criteria for GCA
The ACR 1990 criteria for GCA include age 50 years or older, a headache of new onset, and localized; reduced pulsation, and palpation-tenderness of the temporal artery, which are not attributed to arteriosclerosis of cervical arteries; elevated ESR (≥ 50 mm/h), and biopsy showing characteristic features. The ACR has recommended that at least three (or more) of the five criteria, when positive, carries high sensitivity and specificity with it. Additional ACR criteria include claudication of tongue, jaw, or upon swallowing, and scalp tenderness [1]. The current ACR/EULAR criteria are for vasculitis in general, and not limited to GCA. Clinicians can expect an update from ACR/EULAR on the diagnostic criteria of vasculitis and GCA in the upcoming months.
Epidemiology
GCA has an annual incidence of approximately 10–20 and prevalence of 50 cases [13] in every 100,000 of the general population middle aged or older [13, 14]. The peak incidence is over the age of 70 years [8, 13,15,16,16]. GCA shows a racial predilection for non-Hispanic Caucasians from the northern latitudes, and there is a geographic variation in the incidence of “biopsy positive/negative” GCA cases [17]. GCA has a female gender predilection, with an approximate female to male ratio of 2:1 in the Caucasian population, with an even gender distribution in populations in Spain, India, and Turkey [14, 17, 18]. One of the comorbidities of GCA, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), is reported to occur in approximately 50% of patients with GCA [19••]. Conversely, the same literature shows that approximately 18% of PMR cases have a concomitant GCA. The average time elapsed between onset of symptoms and diagnosis was 6 to 9 weeks [20, 21]. The cranial arteries, primarily the temporal artery of the scalp, are most commonly involved, followed by the ophthalmic, occipital, and posterior auricular arteries [15, 18, 22].
Etiology and Pathophysiology/Pathogenesis
The pathophysiology of GCA is complex and largely unknown; however, the role of age, genetics, and infections has been proposed amongst others [15]. The role of age in the pathogenesis of GCA has been linked to age-related degenerative changes [16, 23•], oxidative damage, protein abnormalities, mutations, mitochondrial defect, and age-related vascular inflammation [16, 24]. A possible role of sex hormones in the pathophysiology of GCA explains the female predilection [17, 25]. The role of infections has been proposed in the pathogenesis of GCA [26]. Due to the cyclical and seasonal nature of GCA manifestations, a role of sun exposure and seasonal infections has been suggested [26]. A hypothesis of increased “infectious load” and consequent activation of vascular dendritic cells has also been proposed. Infectious agents like Chlamydia pneumoniae, parvovirus B19, Epstein-Barr virus, varicella-zoster virus, and most recently COVID-19 have shown an association with GCA [26]. GCA is often described in the literature as a “T-cell mediated disease” [27]. The pathogenesis of GCA is thought to be brought about by an unknown antigen triggering a cascade of immunological events, culminating in the characteristic blood vessel and target tissue changes as observed in tissue histopathology [27, 28] (Fig. 3).
Genetics
A strong association of GCA with certain human leukocyte antigens (HLA) such as HLA-DR4 and HLA-DRB1*04 alleles has been reported [16, 25, 29••, 30]. The HLA-DRB1*04 allele is associated with the resistance of the disease to corticosteroid therapy [29••, 30] and loss of vision secondary to GCA [29••]. Other non-HLA genes related with GCA include PTPN22, LRRC32, IL17A, and IL33 [25].
Clinical Manifestations
Extracranial Manifestations
The constitutional symptoms include low-grade fever, fatigue, weight loss, night sweats, unexplained dry cough [31], backache, abdominal pain or dyspnea, anemia, and depression [14, 18]. Due to its strong association with GCA, all patients with a diagnosis of PMR should be tested for the presence of GCA and vice versa [32]. The extracranial blood vessels mainly involved with GCA include the aorta [33], abdominal aorta [33], the carotid arteries, the vertebral and basilar arteries [34]; the subclavian, axillary, iliac [33], femoral, renal [34], mesenteric [34] and others [33]. The extracranial features include limb claudication, limb vascular bruits, giant cell aortitis, and reduced or absent pulse [35]. Arthritis and arthralgia frequently involve the knees, wrists, and the metacarpophalangeal joints in an asymmetric, nonerosive pattern [36].
Craniofacial Manifestations
The most common/cardinal symptom of GCA is a new onset headache in the temporal region [6, 7, 14, 15, 37] with tenderness and allodynia upon palpation of the temporal artery [18]. Palpation of the artery may reveal irregular contour, beading, thickening, and induration. The onset, duration, frequency, and intensity are reported in widely variable patterns [21, 25, 32, 37, 38]. Scalp tenderness and allodynia are also reported [14, 32]. The involvement of the internal maxillary artery and facial artery results in jaw claudication [6, 14], which is defined as pain and fatigue in the facial and masticatory muscles upon prolonged function and may be relieved with rest [18, 39]. Temporal headache and jaw claudication are the initial symptoms for which the patient seeks relief; hence, their identification is crucial [6].
Approximately 20% of GCA patients present with visual symptoms [15, 18]. Blurred vision, amaurosis fugax, and loss of vision are the most frequent symptoms. Amaurosis fugax along with jaw claudication are symptoms most often related to permanent vision loss [17, 18, 40]. Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) is reported to be the cause of permanent loss of vision in majority of the cases of GCA [39, 41]. Vision loss usually begins unilaterally, and can simultaneously or, in a short period of time, sequentially involve the other eye [15, 17, 40]. Diplopia can be transient or permanent, unilateral, or bilateral depending on the artery involved, and is experienced before vision loss, by 20% of patients due to ophthalmoparesis [17, 42, 43]. One of the rare signs is visual blurring with heat or exercise (Uhthoff’s sign) and marked reduction of the visual field [39, 41].
Oral Manifestations
GCA affecting the lingual artery can show signs of ischemia of the tongue such as loss of taste, unilateral/bilateral pallor, cyanosis, and necrosis. Tongue claudication and pain at rest or on function can be a symptom [8, 18, 32, 38]. The involvement of the ascending pharyngeal artery can result in throat pain and dysphagia. Toothache and gingival pain can also occur secondary to GCA [15, 31, 32, 38, 44].
Atypical Manifestations
These include fever of unknown origin, cough, hearing loss [31], glossitis [15], Raynaud’s phenomenon, minor/major stroke limb claudication [31], and lesions in the breast and ovaries [15]. In addition, systemic associated comorbidities include hypertension, diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and glaucoma [18]. The various comorbidities reported in the literature are presented in Fig. 4.
Histopathology
The cardinal findings in the histopathology of GCA include arterial wall inflammation, destruction of the internal elastic lamina, thickening of the tunica intima, and the presence of multinucleated giant cells at the junction of the tunica media and tunica intima [7, 18]. Half of the temporal artery biopsy specimens may be negative for giant cells [7]. One-third of the biopsied arteries are shown to be negative for GCA [18, 25]. In addition to giant cells, the inflammatory response includes mononuclear lymphocytes, histiocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils [18]. Inflammation of the vasa vasorum may also be seen. “Skip lesions” where there may be unaffected segments of normal looking arterial tissue interspersed between the lesions along the course of the affected artery are characteristic of GCA [7, 18]. This necessitates the process of multiple punch biopsies to enhance the chances of capturing the lesional areas. Some authors and organizations (including EULAR) recommend temporal artery biopsy (when involvement of temporal artery is suspected from clinical features) earlier than late, due to the fact that the histopathological features may not be as robust later in the disease [18].
The diagnosis of GCA has traditionally been by the histopathology features subsequent to biopsy of the affected temporal artery. The 1990 ACR criteria require histopathology for diagnosis. However, the preference to include or avoid temporal artery biopsy has not been without some controversy. Factors such as biopsy length and site, presence of skip lesions, the experience of the surgeon, quality of the biopsy sample, and phenotypic characteristics of the GCA are reasons affecting sensitivity [45]. Though considered a safe procedure, TAB is an invasive technique with associated complications including facial nerve injury, brow ptosis, scalp necrosis, infection, bleeding, and hematoma [17, 46]. Accidental nerve and vein biopsies, incisional alopecia, widening of the scar, and foreign body reaction to entrapped hair have also been reported [46]. A negative biopsy is instrumental in avoiding the long-term risks of corticosteroid therapy [7]. Longer TAB segments are preferred for demonstrating inflammatory changes in artery segments, thereby minimizing the risk of missed diagnosis secondary to skip lesions [46]. Skip lesions are considered when features of arteritis were absent in single or multiple segments of the same artery that showed characteristic features of arteritis in other sections [46].
Laboratory Investigations
Since there are no specific blood biomarkers for GCA, multiple laboratory values are employed for diagnosis. The ACR criteria require the ESR to be > 50 mm/h. Increase in CRP (> 20 mg/L) is another feature [42]. These two values are non-specific yet are sensitive enough in correlation with clinical features of GCA. A complete blood count may reveal anemia, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, and an increase in acute-phase proteins in serum albumin electrophoresis [7]. Thrombocytosis is considered as an adjunct marker that may aid in the differentiation of AION from other types of optic neuropathy. When a complete metabolic panel is ordered, there may be findings of mild abnormalities in the liver function tests, including an increased alkaline phosphatase, increased aspartate transaminase, and prolonged prothrombin time. Elevated von Willebrand factor is another feature in GCA patients.
Imaging
An ultrasound (US) can be used along with the ACR criteria for GCA diagnosis [47]. This may preclude the necessity for the biopsy and avoid delay in prompt initiation of treatment. The EULAR recommends the use of US as the first imaging modality when a diagnosis of GCA is suspected. US abnormalities in GCA are described as “halo” sign, “compression sign,” stenosis, and occlusion. In a transverse scan, the halo is visible as concentric, homogenous, and hypoechoic arterial wall thickening which is well delineated towards the luminal side [48]. “Compression” sign is positive when the hypoechogenic thickened wall demonstrating vasculitis remains visible against the mid-echogenic to hyperechogenic surrounding tissue wall even upon compression [49]. Some studies suggest a 96% specificity for US in the diagnosis of GCA [50]. However, “halo” is also seen in conditions such as amyloidosis and atherosclerosis, hence the added significance of a thorough history and clinical examination [48]. EULAR recommends the use of high-resolution MRI to visualize artery thickness in cranial arteries when US imaging is not available [43], and to monitor long-term structural damage. Detailed information about the arterial lumen and wall can be obtained by MRA and can be used to support the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis [43], with a relatively high sensitivity and specificity.
Positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography angiography can be useful in suspected vasculitis such as GCA [34, 48]. EULAR only recommends the use of PET to detect mural inflammation in extracranial arteries and does not recommend it for cranial arteritis [43]. A combination of symptoms, clinical findings, laboratory data, and imaging is used to diagnose GCA. The ACR’s GCA criteria were formulated to differentiate GCA from other vasculitides and should not be confused with clinical diagnostic criteria [51].
Differential Diagnosis
Due to considerable overlap in the clinical features and investigations, the three entities considered in the differential diagnosis of GCA are PMR, MMS, and Takayasu arteritis. A summary of the comparisons of these four entities is given in Table 1.
Management
Corticosteroid therapy is the treatment of choice for GCA, due to its long-term success, although newer drugs are being currently studied. One of the main goals of steroid therapy is to prevent blindness [78]. Some studies have shown that hypoechoic halo disappears within 3 weeks with tapered doses of corticosteroids [44, 47], while others show evidence of continuing arteritis after a long course of steroid therapy [79, 80]. Daily dosage of 40–60 mg of prednisone is prescribed as a single or divided dose for 2–4 weeks [41, 67], with the progress being evaluated with subsequent ESR and CRP levels. However, a better assessment can be made with the level of interleukin-6 after 4 weeks, following which the dosage can be titrated [67, 81,83,83]. Abrupt exacerbation of the symptoms of GCA is seen in 30 to 50% of the cases even with corticosteroid therapy [39, 67, 81, 84]. Recently, tocilizumab has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to be used in combination with a tapered dose of corticosteroids, and not as a monotherapy [85]. There is no established treatment protocol regarding the dosage, route of drug administration, and period of the drug therapy; however, preventing blindness and stroke should be the primary objective [10, 86].
Complications
Stroke and blindness are the most common and serious complications of GCA [41, 70, 74, 87], along with thoracic aortic aneurysm and cardiovascular complications [88, 89]. Other significant complications of GCA include cranial aneurysm, posterior stroke, cognitive impairment, seizures, and mood fluctuations [34, 90, 91]. Life-threatening extracranial manifestations of GCA are intestinal infarction, pulmonary embolism, renal insufficiency, transient ischemic attacks, and carotid artery dissection [34, 38, 92,94,95,96,97,98,99,99]. Aortic complications reported are aortic aneurysm or dissection (mainly the ascending aorta), and aortic arch syndrome [34, 35, 100,102,103,104,104]. Lingual artery ischemia can cause tongue claudication which results in tongue blanching and bluish hue and may even lead to necrosis and gangrene formation [39, 44, 105]. More rare complications of GCA include lip necrosis [106]. Complications of GCA secondary to treatment with drugs such as steroids including methyl prednisone include ischemic cerebrovascular accidents [90, 92, 107], cardiac arrhythmias, infection, epileptic attacks, tissue necrosis, anaphylaxis, hyperglycemia, and gastric disturbances [40, 108,110,110]. Flaring up of the GCA can also occur due to low doses of corticosteroids [39]. Drugs such as tocilizumab used to treat GCA may cause adverse effects including myocardial infarction, stroke, organ failure, and infections [111].
Case Discussion in the Context of the Literature
Onset
The sudden onset of headache reported in this patient is consistent with the literature [18, 19••, 22, 24, 25]. Recently published reviews have mentioned the new onset or changed pattern of the headache in a middle-aged individual as “prompting concern” for GCA [15, 94]. The periauricular pain has been variably reported as slow or acute [112, 113]. Similar to this patient’s slow onset neck pain, case reports have previously been published [7, 41, 114]. Jaw claudication has also been reported in previous cases [6, 14, 19••, 24].
Location
Temporal pain reported by our patient has been consistent with location in the existing GCA literature [114]. However, the bilaterality of the headache is rather unusual [114]. Similar to our patient case, there have been reports of relatively rapid loss of vision in the second eye following the first. The patient also complains of peri-auricular and temporomandibular joint pain, which is also in accordance with previously published reports [7, 18, 22, 25]. The neck and arm pain experienced by our patient was found in other articles [11, 62, 114, 115].
Chronicity
The bilateral temporal pain reported as acute, and the neck and arm pain perceived as chronic, is consistent with established literature [55, 116].
Frequency
The reported “continuous” frequency of temporal pain, “intermittent” TMJ and ear pain, and “multiple episodes” of neck and arm pain have appeared in the published literature [24, 37, 113].
Duration
The long duration of the temporal pain, the shorter nature of the TMJ and ear pain, and the varied nature of neck and arm pain reported in this case were also reported previously [15, 37, 116].
Intensity
The temporal pain intensity of five to six, TMJ and ear pain intensity of four to five, and neck pain of three to four on a VAS scale are consistent with the literature [21].
Quality
The “throbbing and pulsating” quality of the temporal pain [117, 118] and “aching nature” of TMJ, neck, and arm pain have been reported [117, 119].
Temporal Characteristics
The chronic progressively worsening nature of the bilateral temporal pain, the non-progressive nature of the neck, arm, TMJ, and ear pain has been described previously [119].
Associated Features
The sudden loss of vision observed in this patient (both complete and partial) has been reported in the literature [120].
Radiation/Referral
Pain radiating from head and neck to the arm and shoulders has been reported in GCA cases [121].
Time Elapsed from Symptom Onset to Diagnosis
The time elapsed between the first appearance of symptoms to diagnosis in our current case (2 months) is consistent with the literature [20, 21, 122]. The time elapsed of approximately 2 to 3 months from onset of symptoms to the first vision loss, and the second episode of acute loss of vision within 2 weeks of the first episode, is consistent with the known literature [15, 17, 40].
Response to Past Treatment
The response of the patient’s condition to high doses of systemic corticosteroids (non-progression of further vision loss) goes along with the known literature [44, 47, 78].
Aggravating Factors
Jaw claudication and neck pain aggravated with function have been reported [18, 39].
Relieving Factors
The TMJ, ear, and the neck and radiating arm pain relieved by rest have been reported in previous literature [18, 39]. The unrelenting nature of the temporal pain has also been reported [118].
Association with Sleep
Association of GCA with disturbed sleep, reduced quality of sleep, and waking patient from sleep, observed in our current patient is consistent with existing literature [7, 123, 124]. An interesting feature noted by certain authors is the discovery of the loss of vision when patients wake up in the morning, and this has been proposed to be attributed to the sleep-related reduction in the blood pressure and the ensuing optic ischemia [124].
Other Features
The laboratory test features in the patient, of leukocytosis, neutrophilia, thrombocytosis, elevated ESR, and CRP, appear in the known literature [42, 55, 65, 98, 125]. The comorbidity of type II diabetes and symptoms of PMR that appeared in this patient have been previously described [18, 88].
A comparison of the features of the current case with those that appear in the literature is summarized in Table 2.
Conclusion and Clinical Pearls
GCA is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by vasculitis of the large and medium arteries. Headache, jaw claudication, and visual symptoms may be few of the earlier presenting symptoms of GCA. To prevent life-altering complications such as permanent blindness, prompt aggressive therapy is necessary once the differential diagnosis of GCA is established. Guidelines such as ACR and EULAR should be adhered in the management of the condition.
Data Availability
Data including the patient’s history, test results, and clinical notes is available within the article.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Stevens MB, Arend WP, Calabrese LH, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(8):1122–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780330810.
Ameer MA, Peterfy RJ, Khazaeni B. Temporal arteritis. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Copyright © 2022, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2022.
Borchers AT, Gershwin ME. Giant cell arteritis: a review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11(6–7):A544–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2012.01.003.
• Schwedt TJ, Dodick DW, Caselli RJ. Giant cell arteritis. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006;10(6):415–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-006-0071-6. A well-done review article that concisely describes the features of GCA.
Hellmich B, Agueda A, Monti S, Buttgereit F, de Boysson H, Brouwer E, et al. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of large vessel vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215672.
Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, Basu N, Cid MC, Ferrario F, et al. 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.37715.
Peral-Cagigal B, Pérez-Villar Á, Redondo-González LM, García-Sierra C, Morante-Silva M, Madrigal-Rubiales B, et al. Temporal headache and jaw claudication may be the key for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23(3):e290–4. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22298.
Younger DS. Giant cell arteritis. Neurol Clin. 2019;37(2):335–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2019.01.008.
Dejaco C, Duftner C, Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. The spectrum of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: revisiting the concept of the disease. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017;56(4):506–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew273.
Torp CK, Brüner M, Keller KK, Brouwer E, Hauge EM, McGonagle D, et al. Vasculitis therapy refines vasculitis mechanistic classification. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20(6):102829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102829.
Fraser JA, Weyand CM, Newman NJ, Biousse V. The treatment of giant cell arteritis. Rev Neurol Dis. 2008;5(3):140–52.
Gonzalez-Gay MA, Miranda-Filloy JA, Lopez-Diaz MJ, Perez-Alvarez R, Gonzalez-Juanatey C, Sanchez-Andrade A, et al. Giant cell arteritis in northwestern Spain: a 25-year epidemiologic study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007;86(2):61–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0b013e31803d1764.
Paulley JW, Hughes JP. Giant-cell arteritis, or arteritis of the aged. Br Med J. 1960;2(5212):1562–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5212.1562.
Li KJ, Semenov D, Turk M, Pope J. A meta-analysis of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis across time and space. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02450-w.
Ponte C, Martins-Martinho J, Luqmani RA. Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(Suppl 3):iii5-iii16. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez553.
Smith JH, Swanson JW. Giant cell arteritis. Headache. 2014;54(8):1273–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12425.
Nordborg C, Nordborg E, Petursdottir V. Giant cell arteritis. Epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis. Apmis. 2000;108(11):713–24. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0463.2000.d01-19.x.
Simon S, Ninan J, Hissaria P. Diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis: major review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;49(2):169–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13897.
•• Lyons HS, Quick V, Sinclair AJ, Nagaraju S, Mollan SP. A new era for giant cell arteritis. Eye (Lond). 2020;34(6):1013–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0608-7. This was selected because this is one of the most comprehensive reviews on GCA including pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of GCA.
Buttgereit F, Dejaco C, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;315(22):2442–58. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5444.
Singh AG, Kermani TA, Crowson CS, Weyand CM, Matteson EL, Warrington KJ. Visual manifestations in giant cell arteritis: trend over 5 decades in a population-based cohort. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(2):309–15. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.140188.
Imai N, Kuroda R, Konishi T, Serizawa M, Kobari M. Giant cell arteritis: clinical features of patients visiting a headache clinic in Japan. Intern Med. 2011;50(16):1679–82. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.50.5205.
• Thomas DC, Thomas P, Sivan A, Unnam P, Ajayakumar A, Kumar SS, et al. Monckeberg’s medial sclerosis as a cause for headache and facial pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021;25(8):50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-021-00965-0. This article describes and differentiates GCA from a very similar entity, Monckeberg’s medial sclerosis, which interestingly coexisted in the current case of GCA.
Weyand CM, Liao YJ, Goronzy JJ. The immunopathology of giant cell arteritis: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Neuroophthalmol. 2012;32(3):259–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e318268aa9b.
Pradeep S, Smith JH. Giant cell arteritis: practical pearls and updates. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018;22(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0655-y.
Winkler A, True D. Giant cell arteritis: 2018 review. Mo Med. 2018;115(5):468–70.
Ciccia F, Rizzo A, Ferrante A, Guggino G, Croci S, Cavazza A, et al. New insights into the pathogenesis of giant cell arteritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(7):675–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2017.05.004.
Al-Mousawi AZ, Gurney SP, Lorenzi AR, Pohl U, Dayan M, Mollan SP. Reviewing the pathophysiology behind the advances in the management of giant cell arteritis. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(2):177–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-0171-0.
•• Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Medium- and large-vessel vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(2):160–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra022694. This article succinctly explains the main differential diagnoses of GCA.
Mackie SL, Taylor JC, Haroon-Rashid L, Martin S, Dasgupta B, Gough A, et al. Association of HLA-DRB1 amino acid residues with giant cell arteritis: genetic association study, meta-analysis and geo-epidemiological investigation. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0692-4.
Carroll SC, Gaskin BJ, Danesh-Meyer HV. Giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34(2):159–73;quiz 94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01186.x.
Hellmann DB. Temporal arteritis: a cough, toothache, and tongue infarction. JAMA. 2002;287(22):2996–3000. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.22.2996.
Jones JG. Clinical features of giant cell arteritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1991;5(3):413–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80063-9.
Blockmans D, de Ceuninck L, Vanderschueren S, Knockaert D, Mortelmans L, Bobbaers H. Repetitive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in giant cell arteritis: a prospective study of 35 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(1):131–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21699.
Lensen KD, Voskuyl AE, Comans EF, van der Laken CJ, Smulders YM. Extracranial giant cell arteritis: a narrative review. Neth J Med. 2016;74(5):182–92.
Espitia O, Blonz G, Urbanski G, Landron C, Connault J, Lavigne C, et al. Symptomatic aortitis at giant cell arteritis diagnosis: a prognostic factor of aortic event. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021;23(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02396-5.
Salvarani C, Pipitone N, Versari A, Hunder GG. Clinical features of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(9):509–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2012.97.
Mollan SP, Paemeleire K, Versijpt J, Luqmani R, Sinclair AJ. European Headache Federation recommendations for neurologists managing giant cell arteritis. J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01093-7.
Paraskevas KI, Boumpas DT, Vrentzos GE, Mikhailidis DP. Oral and ocular/orbital manifestations of temporal arteritis: a disease with deceptive clinical symptoms and devastating consequences. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(7):1044–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0493-x.
Friedlander AH, Runyon C. Polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69(3):317–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(90)90292-z.
Liu GT, Glaser JS, Schatz NJ, Smith JL. Visual morbidity in giant cell arteritis. Clinical characteristics and prognosis for vision. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(11):1779–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31102-x.
Swannell AJ. Polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis: diagnosis and management. BMJ. 1997;314(7090):1329–32. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1329.
Dinkin M, Johnson E. One giant step for giant cell arteritis: updates in diagnosis and treatment. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2021;23(2):6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-020-00660-2.
Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Duftner C, Besson FL, Bley TA, Blockmans D, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(5):636–43. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212649.
Sandler NA, Ziccardi V, Ochs M. Differential diagnosis of jaw pain in the elderly. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126(9):1263–72. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0361.
Rubenstein E, Maldini C, Gonzalez-Chiappe S, Chevret S, Mahr A. Sensitivity of temporal artery biopsy in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(5):1011–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez385.
Davies CG, May DJ. The role of temporal artery biopsies in giant cell arteritis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(1):4–5. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588411x12851639107476.
Schmidt WA, Kraft HE, Vorpahl K, Völker L, Gromnica-Ihle EJ. Color duplex ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporal arteritis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(19):1336–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199711063371902.
Schäfer VS, Jin L, Schmidt WA. Imaging for diagnosis, monitoring, and outcome prediction of large vessel vasculitides. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020;22(11):76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-020-00955-y.
Chrysidis S, Duftner C, Dejaco C, Schäfer VS, Ramiro S, Carrara G, et al. Definitions and reliability assessment of elementary ultrasound lesions in giant cell arteritis: a study from the OMERACT Large Vessel Vasculitis Ultrasound Working Group. RMD Open. 2018;4(1):e000598. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000598.
Duftner C, Dejaco C, Sepriano A, Falzon L, Schmidt WA, Ramiro S. Imaging in diagnosis, outcome prediction and monitoring of large vessel vasculitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis informing the EULAR recommendations. RMD Open. 2018;4(1):e000612. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000612.
Ness T, Bley TA, Schmidt WA, Lamprecht P. The diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013;110(21):376–85;quiz 86. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2013.0376.
Russo RAG, Katsicas MM. Takayasu arteritis Front Pediatr. 2018;6:265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00265.
Lanzer P, Boehm M, Sorribas V, Thiriet M, Janzen J, Zeller T, et al. Medial vascular calcification revisited: review and perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(23):1515–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu163.
Bajocchi G, Cavazza A. Histopathology of vasculitis. Reumatismo. 2018;70(3):155–64. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2018.1096.
Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Clinical practice. Giant-cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):50–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1214825.
Guggino G, Ferrante A, Macaluso F, Triolo G, Ciccia F. Pathogenesis of polymyalgia rheumatica. Reumatismo. 2018;70(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2018.1048.
Camellino D, Giusti A, Girasole G, Bianchi G, Dejaco C. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of polymyalgia rheumatica. Drugs Aging. 2019;36(11):1015–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-019-00705-5.
Watts RA, Hatemi G, Burns JC, Mohammad AJ. Global epidemiology of vasculitis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022;18(1):22–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-021-00718-8.
Podgorska D, Podgorski R, Aebisher D, Dabrowski P. Takayasu arteritis - epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. J Appl Biomed. 2019;17(1):20. https://doi.org/10.32725/jab.2018.005.
Renauer P, Sawalha AH. The genetics of Takayasu arteritis. Presse Med. 2017;46(7–8 Pt 2):e179–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2016.11.031.
Esatoglu SN, Ok AM, Ucar D, Celik AF, Ugurlu S, Hamuryudan V et al. Takayasu’s arteritis: associated inflammatory diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38 Suppl 124(2):61–8.
Stamatis P. Giant cell arteritis versus Takayasu arteritis: an update. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2020;31(2):174–82. https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.31.2.174.
Barreira SC, Melo AT, Ponte C, Khmelinskii N. Macaroni sign and carotid occlusion in Takayasu’s arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(4):2029–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa520.
Dedushi K, Hyseni F, Musa J, Rahman M, Saliaj K, Vokshi V, et al. MRI diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis in a young woman. Radiol Case Rep. 2021;16(12):3915–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2021.09.030.
Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dejaco C. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. JAMA. 2020;324(10):993–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.10155.
Dejaco C, Brouwer E, Mason JC, Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: current challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(10):578–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.142.
Salvarani C, Cantini F, Boiardi L, Hunder GG. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(4):261–71. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra011913.
Keser G, Direskeneli H, Aksu K. Management of Takayasu arteritis: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(5):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket320.
Misra DP, Wakhlu A, Agarwal V, Danda D. Recent advances in the management of Takayasu arteritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(Suppl 1):60–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.13285.
Soriano A, Muratore F, Pipitone N, Boiardi L, Cimino L, Salvarani C. Visual loss and other cranial ischaemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(8):476–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.98.
Sobrero A, Manzo C, Stimamiglio A. The role of the general practitioner and the out-of-hospital public rheumatologist in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. Reumatismo. 2018;70(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2018.1036.
Hernández-Rodríguez J, Font C, García-Martínez A, Espígol-Frigolé G, Sanmartí R, Cañete JD, et al. Development of ischemic complications in patients with giant cell arteritis presenting with apparently isolated polymyalgia rheumatica: study of a series of 100 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007;86(4):233–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e318145275c.
Zhou Y, Feng Y, Zhang W, Li H, Zhang K, Wu Z. Physical exercise in managing Takayasu arteritis patients complicated with cardiovascular diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:603354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.603354.
Kermani TA, Warrington KJ. Prognosis and monitoring of giant cell arteritis and associated complications. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14(5):379–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666x.2018.1467758.
Camellino D, Cimmino MA. Imaging of polymyalgia rheumatica: indications on its pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keq450.
Pisani I, De Troia A, Allegri L, Corradi D, Vaglio A. Malignant Mönckeberg medial calcific sclerosis. Intern Emerg Med. 2018;13(4):615–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-018-1794-1.
Basu N, Karabayas M, Pusey C. Prognosis and future developments in vasculitis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32(1):148–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2018.08.011.
Dua AB, Husainat NM, Kalot MA, Byram K, Springer JM, James KE, et al. Giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy and benefits and harms of common treatments. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021;3(7):429–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11226.
McDonnell PJ, Moore GW, Miller NR, Hutchins GM, Green WR. Temporal arteritis. A clinicopathologic study Ophthalmology. 1986;93(4):518–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33706-0.
Fauchald P, Rygvold O, Oystese B. Temporal arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Clinical and biopsy findings. Ann Intern Med. 1972;77(6):845–52. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-77-6-845.
Salvarani C, Macchioni PL, Tartoni PL, Rossi F, Baricchi R, Castri C, et al. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: a 5-year epidemiologic and clinical study in Reggio Emilia. Italy Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1987;5(3):205–15.
Cantini F, Salvarani C, Olivieri I, Macchioni L, Ranzi A, Niccoli L, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in the evaluation of disease activity and severity in polymyalgia rheumatica: a prospective follow-up study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2000;30(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1053/sarh.2000.8366.
Hoffman GS, Cid MC, Hellmann DB, Guillevin L, Stone JH, Schousboe J, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adjuvant methotrexate treatment for giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(5):1309–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10262.
Jover JA, Hernández-García C, Morado IC, Vargas E, Bañares A, Fernández-Gutiérrez B. Combined treatment of giant-cell arteritis with methotrexate and prednisone. a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(2):106–14. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-2-200101160-00010.
Schirmer M, Muratore F, Salvarani C. Tocilizumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14(5):339–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666x.2018.1468251.
Hayreh SS, Zimmerman B. Management of giant cell arteritis. Our 27-year clinical study: new light on old controversies. Ophthalmologica. 2003;217(4):239–59. https://doi.org/10.1159/000070631.
Gonzalez-Gay MA, Piñeiro A, Gomez-Gigirey A, Garcia-Porrua C, Pego-Reigosa R, Dierssen-Sotos T, et al. Influence of traditional risk factors of atherosclerosis in the development of severe ischemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2004;83(6):342–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.md.0000145369.25558.b5.
Kermani TA, Warrington KJ, Crowson CS, Ytterberg SR, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE, et al. Large-vessel involvement in giant cell arteritis: a population-based cohort study of the incidence-trends and prognosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(12):1989–94. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202408.
Nordborg E, Bengtsson BA. Death rates and causes of death in 284 consecutive patients with giant cell arteritis confirmed by biopsy. BMJ. 1989;299(6698):549–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6698.549.
Gál R, Bălaşa R, Bajkó Z, Maier S, Simu I, Bălaşa A. Lethal subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage associated with temporal arteritis. A case report. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2017;3(4):153–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccm-2017-0028.
Salvarani C, Giannini C, Miller DV, Hunder G. Giant cell arteritis: involvement of intracranial arteries. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(6):985–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22359.
Säve-Söderbergh J, Malmvall BE, Andersson R, Bengtsson BA. Giant cell arteritis as a cause of death. Report of nine cases Jama. 1986;255(4):493–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03370040067025.
Andersson R. Giant cell arteritis as a cause of death. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2000;18(4 Suppl 20):S27–8.
Caselli RJ, Hunder GG, Whisnant JP. Neurologic disease in biopsy-proven giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Neurology. 1988;38(3):352–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.38.3.352.
Martin JF, Kittas C, Triger DR. Giant cell arteritis of coronary arteries causing myocardial infarction. Br Heart J. 1980;43(4):487–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.43.4.487.
Bajko Z, Balasa R, Maier S, Motataianu A, Barcutean L, Andone S, et al. Stroke secondary to giant-cell arteritis: a literature review. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(2):876. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10308.
Lie JT. Aortic and extracranial large vessel giant cell arteritis: a review of 72 cases with histopathologic documentation. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1995;24(6):422–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0049-0172(95)80010-7.
Camellino D, Matteson EL, Buttgereit F, Dejaco C. Monitoring and long-term management of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(9):481–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0458-5.
Brekke LK, Fevang BS, Diamantopoulos AP, Assmus J, Esperø E, Gjesdal CG. Survival and death causes of patients with giant cell arteritis in Western Norway 1972–2012: a retrospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):154. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1945-4.
Rynio P, Kazimierczak A, Gutowski P, Cnotliwy M. An unusual case of aortic rupture after deployment of a bare stent in the treatment of aortic dissection in a patient with giant-cell arteritis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017;12(2):194–8. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2017.67677.
Nuenninghoff DM, Hunder GG, Christianson TJ, McClelland RL, Matteson EL. Incidence and predictors of large-artery complication (aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and/or large-artery stenosis) in patients with giant cell arteritis: a population-based study over 50 years. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(12):3522–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11353.
Gruener AM, Poostchi A, Carey AR, Eberhart CG, Henderson AD, Chang JR, et al. Association of giant cell arteritis with race. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(10):1175–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2919.
Marie I, Proux A, Duhaut P, Primard E, Lahaxe L, Girszyn N, et al. Long-term follow-up of aortic involvement in giant cell arteritis: a series of 48 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2009;88(3):182–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3181a68ae2.
Metias M, Kelian S, MacColl C, Iyer V, Rapanos T. Aortic dissection and accelerated aneurysmal degeneration in a patient with giant cell arteritis. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2020;6(4):598–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.07.019.
Mar NJ. Implications of giant cell arteritis in older adults. Spec Care Dentist. 1994;14(2):71–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-4505.1994.tb01105.x.
Patterson A, Scully C, Barnard N, Griffiths MJ, Eveson JW, Novelli M. Necrosis of the tongue in a patient with intestinal infarction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;74(5):582–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90348-t.
Staunton H, Stafford F, Leader M, O’Riordain D. Deterioration of giant cell arteritis with corticosteroid therapy. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(4):581–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.57.4.581.
Chan CC, Paine M, O’Day J. Steroid management in giant cell arteritis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(9):1061–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.9.1061.
Bengtsson BA, Malmvall BE. The epidemiology of giant cell arteritis including temporal arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Incidences of different clinical presentations and eye complications. Arthritis Rheum. 1981;24(7):899–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780240706.
Andersson R, Malmvall BE, Bengtsson BA. Long-term corticosteroid treatment in giant cell arteritis. Acta Med Scand. 1986;220(5):465–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1986.tb02796.x.
Gale S, Wilson JC, Chia J, Trinh H, Tuckwell K, Collinson N, et al. Risk associated with cumulative oral glucocorticoid use in patients with giant cell arteritis in real-world databases from the USA and UK. Rheumatol Ther. 2018;5(2):327–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-018-0112-8.
Imran TF, Helfgott S. Respiratory and otolaryngologic manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015;33(2 Suppl 89):S-164–70.
Coppeto JR. Spontaneous ear pain as the initial presenting manifestation of giant cell arteritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47(9):1059. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.47.9.1059.
Shikino K, Yamashita S, Ikusaka M. Giant cell arteritis with carotidynia. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(12):1403–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4093-z.
Sharma TL. Common primary and secondary causes of headache in the elderly. Headache. 2018;58(3):479–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13252.
Caselli RJ, Hunder GG. Neurologic complications of giant cell (temporal) arteritis. Semin Neurol. 1994;14(4):349–53. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1041094.
Robson JC, Almeida C, Dawson J, Bromhead A, Dures E, Guly C, et al. Patient perceptions of health-related quality of life in giant cell arteritis: international development of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(10):4671–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keab076.
Rozen TD. Brief sharp stabs of head pain and giant cell arteritis. Headache. 2010;50(9):1516–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01718.x.
Hayreh SS. Masticatory muscle pain: an important indicator of giant cell arteritis. Spec Care Dentist. 1998;18(2):60–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-4505.1998.tb00905.x.
Mandura RA. Giant cell arteritis presenting as unilateral arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16653. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16653.
Jacob A, Ledingham JG, Kerr AI, Ford MJ. Ulcerative colitis and giant cell arteritis associated with sensorineural deafness. J Laryngol Otol. 1990;104(11):889–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100114264.
Czihal M, Zanker S, Rademacher A, Tatò F, Kuhlencordt PJ, Schulze-Koops H, et al. Sonographic and clinical pattern of extracranial and cranial giant cell arteritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(3):231–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2011.641581.
Waldman CW, Waldman SD, Waldman RA. Giant cell arteritis. Med Clin North Am. 2013;97(2):329–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2012.12.006.
Patil P, Karia N, Jain S, Dasgupta B. Giant cell arteritis: a review. Eye Brain. 2013;5:23–33. https://doi.org/10.2147/eb.S21825.
Oerding C, Kaden I, Wohlfarth K. Isolated bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis and recurrent ischemic strokes in a patient with suspected giant cell arteritis. Case Rep Neurol. 2020;12(1):84–91. https://doi.org/10.1159/000504018.
Wirth M, Schirmer L, Hofauer B, Lenschow M, Loos D, Thuermel K, et al. Head and neck giant cell arteritis: an autoimmune disease with many faces. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(9):986–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2017.1314010.
González-Gay M, Ortego-Jurado M, Ercole L, Ortego-Centeno N. Giant cell arteritis: is the clinical spectrum of the disease changing? BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1225-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Davis C Thomas and Priyanka Kodaganallur Pitchumani are first and last authors respectively, who are responsible for inception of the project, literature search, major write-up, and supervising the project. Blessy C Mathai, Anjali Ravi, Surabhi Chhabra, and Upasana Lingaiah performed literature search, contributed to case work-up and write-up, and aided in manuscript type up. Blessy C Mathai, Surabhi Chhabra, Priyanka Kodaganallur Pitchumani, and Davis C Thomas contributed to the custom diagrams. Prisly Thomas and Deep P Pillai are responsible for case work-up, management of the patient (treating physicians), literature search, processing and sharing of biopsy, and imaging reports. Dahlia Joseph contributed to case work-up, literature search, and analysis of biopsy reports.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
N/A; critical literature review.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from the patient for participation in this case report and for submission to the journal. No patient identifiers appear on any section of the manuscript.
Consent to Publish
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.
Conflict of Interest
Davis C Thomas, Prisly Thomas, Deep P Pillai, Dahlia Joseph, Upasana Lingaiah, Blessy C Mathai, Anjali Ravi, Surabhi Chhabra, and Priyanka Kodaganallur Pitchumani declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Uncommon and/or Unusual Headaches and Syndromes
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, D.C., Thomas, P., Pillai, D.P. et al. Giant Cell Arteritis: A Case-Based Narrative Review of the Literature. Curr Pain Headache Rep 26, 725–740 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-022-01075-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-022-01075-1