Skip to main content
Log in

ICD Programming to Reduce Shocks and Improve Outcomes

  • Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing (EK Heist, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the clinical benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), there is a high frequency of inappropriate ICD therapy associated with impaired quality of life, unwanted health care resource utilization, and adverse clinical outcome. Alternative strategies of ICD programming are needed to reduce the risk of inappropriate and “unnecessary” ICD therapies and to improve patient outcome. In this review, we provide an overview of the rate of inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapies in clinical trials and large registries as well as a review of current trials evaluating novel ICD programming to reduce inappropriate ICD therapy to avoid unnecessary ICD therapy. Based on recent studies including a large randomized trial, we recommend a simple programming approach involving high-rate device therapy beginning at 200 bpm with a 2.5 sec delay for it reduces inappropriate therapy, unnecessary therapy, and all-cause mortality in patients receiving ICD or CRT-D devices for primary prevention indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1933–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Khatib SM, Hellkamp A, Bardy GH, Hammill S, Hall WJ, Mark DB, et al. Survival of patients receiving a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in clinical practice vs clinical trials. JAMA. 2013;309:55–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown DW, Croft JB, Greenlund KJ, Mensah GA, Giles WH. Trends in hospitalization for the implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators in the united states, 1990-2005. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1753–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Stevenson LW, Heidenreich PA, Lang CM, Curtis JP, et al. Review of the registry's fourth year, incorporating lead data and pediatric icd procedures, and use as a national performance measure. Heart Rhythm Off J Heart Rhythm Soc. 2010;7:1340–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Opic P, Utens EM, Moons P, Theuns DA, van Dijk AP, Hoendermis ES, et al. Psychosocial impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (icd) in young adults with tetralogy of fallot. Clin Res Cardiol Off J Ger Card Soc. 2012;101:509–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sweeney MO, Wathen MS, Volosin K, Abdalla I, DeGroot PJ, Otterness MF, et al. Appropriate and inappropriate ventricular therapies, quality of life, and mortality among primary and secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: results from the pacing fast vt reduces shock therapies (painfree rx ii) trial. Circulation. 2005;111:2898–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daubert JP, Zareba W, Cannom DS, McNitt S, Rosero SZ, Wang P, et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in madit ii: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1357–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Rees JB, Borleffs CJ, de Bie MK, Stijnen T, van Erven L, Bax JJ, et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:556–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1009–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein RC, Raitt MH, Wilkoff BL, Beckman KJ, Coromilas J, Wyse DG, et al. Analysis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (avid) trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:940–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL, Leon AR, Lieberman R, Wilkoff B, et al. Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the miracle icd trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2685–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saxon LA, Hayes DL, Gilliam FR, Heidenreich PA, Day J, Seth M, et al. Long-term outcome after icd and crt implantation and influence of remote device follow-up: the altitude survival study. Circulation. 2010;122:2359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorian P. Counterpoint: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias increase mortality. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gasparini M, Nisam S. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator harm? Europace. 2012;14:1087–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sweeney MO. Point: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias increase mortality. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:985–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sweeney MO, Sherfesee L, DeGroot PJ, Wathen MS, Wilkoff BL. Differences in effects of electrical therapy type for ventricular arrhythmias on mortality in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:353–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pacifico A, Ferlic LL, Cedillo-Salazar FR, Nasir Jr N, Doyle TK, Henry PD. Shocks as predictors of survival in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:204–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moss AJ, Greenberg H, Case RB, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Brown MW, et al. Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator. Circulation. 2004;110:3760–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vollmann D, Luthje L, Vonhof S, Unterberg C. Inappropriate therapy and fatal proarrhythmia by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm Off J Heart Rhythm Soc. 2005;2:307–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehto M, Snapinn S, Dickstein K, Swedberg K, Nieminen MS. Prognostic risk of atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction: the optimaal experience. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:350–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedersen OD, Abildstrom SZ, Ottesen MM, Rask-Madsen C, Bagger H, Kober L, et al. Increased risk of sudden and non-sudden cardiovascular death in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter following acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jabre P, Jouven X, Adnet F, Thabut G, Bielinski SJ, Weston SA, et al. Atrial fibrillation and death after myocardial infarction: a community study. Circulation. 2011;123:2094–100.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yabe S, Smith WM, Daubert J, Wolf PD, Rollins DL, Ideker RE. Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. Circ Res. 1990;66:1190–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hurst T, Hinrichs M, Breidenbach C, Katz N, Waldecker B. Detection of myocardial injury during transvenous implantation of automatic cardioverter-defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Epstein AE, Kay GN, Plumb VJ, Dailey SM, Anderson PG. Gross and microscopic pathological changes associated with nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator leads. Circulation. 1998;98:1517–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Geuze RH, de Vente J. Arrhythmias and left ventricular function after defibrillation during acute myocardial infarction in the intact dog. Am Heart J. 1983;106:292–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilkoff BL, Williamson BD, Stern RS, Moore SL, Lu F, Lee SW, et al. Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the prepare (primary prevention parameters evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:541–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shome S, Li D, Thompson J, McCabe A. Improving contemporary algorithms for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator function. J Electrocardiol. 2010;43:503–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wathen MS, DeGroot PJ, Sweeney MO, Stark AJ, Otterness MF, Adkisson WO, et al. Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: pacing fast ventricular tachycardia reduces shock therapies (painfree rx ii) trial results. Circulation. 2004;110:2591–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wathen MS, Sweeney MO, DeGroot PJ, Stark AJ, Koehler JL, Chisner MB, et al. Shock reduction using antitachycardia pacing for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001;104:796–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilkoff BL, Ousdigian KT, Sterns LD, Wang ZJ, Wilson RD, Morgan JM. A comparison of empiric to physician-tailored programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the prospective randomized multicenter empiric trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:330–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, Brown MW, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, et al. Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through icd programming. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2275–83. This study provides evidence on the beneficial effects of novel ICD programming to reduce inappropriate ICD therapy and improve survival in primary prevention ICD patients.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schuger C, Daubert JP, Brown MW, Cannom D, Estes 3rd NA, Hall WJ, et al. Multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial: reduce inappropriate therapy (madit-rit): background, rationale, and clinical protocol. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2012;17:176–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gasparini M, Proclemer A, Klersy C, Kloppe A, Lunati M, Ferrer JB, et al. Effect of long-detection interval vs standard-detection interval for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on antitachycardia pacing and shock delivery: the advance iii randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309:1903–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saeed M, Razavi M, Neason CG, Petrutiu S. Rationale and design for programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with primary prevention indication to prolong time to first shock (provide) study. Europace. 2011;13:1648–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schwab JO, Gasparini M, Lunati M, Proclemer A, Kaup B, Santi E, et al. Avoid delivering therapies for nonsustained fast ventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with implantable cardioverter/defibrillator: the advance iii trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20:663–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saeed M, Neason CG, Razavi M, Chandiramani S, Alonso J, Natarajan S, et al. Programming antitachycardia pacing for primary prevention in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: results from the prove trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:1349–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Institutional research support from Boston Scientific, St. Paul, Minnesota to the University of Rochester Medical Center for MADIT-related ICD trials.

Valentina Kutyifa, Wojciech Zareba, and Arthur J. Moss declare that they have no other conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentina Kutyifa.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kutyifa, V., Zareba, W. & Moss, A.J. ICD Programming to Reduce Shocks and Improve Outcomes. Curr Cardiol Rep 16, 496 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-014-0496-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-014-0496-1

Keywords

Navigation