Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of cutaneous drug reactions

  • Published:
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drugs are potent chemicals that often have effects in the body beyond the desired action. These effects may range from mild and expected side effects to dramatic and lifethreatening anaphylaxis. Adverse drug reactions account for between 2% and 6% of hospital admissions and may prevent administration of otherwise effective therapeutic agents. Cutaneous and mucocutaneous eruptions are the most common adverse reactions to oral or parenteral drug therapy, and the spectrum ranges from transitory exanthematous rash to the potentially fatal toxic epidermal necrolysis. Different mechansims, including both immunologic and nonimmunologic, are responsible for cutaneous adverse drug reaction. The treatment of cutaneous drug eruptions essentially rests on accurate history, a thorough physical examination, discontinuation of the offending drug, and supportive care. The management of a cutaneous drug eruption is very much individualized, based on the clinical setting. This review aims to provide a general approach to the patient with a presumed cutaneous drug reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN: Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 1998, 279:1200–1205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, et al.: Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1995, 274:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ives TJ, Bentz EJ, Gwyther RE: Dermatologic adverse drug reactions in a family medicine setting. Arch Fam Med 1992, 1:241–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Einarson TR: Drug-related hospital admissions. Ann Pharmacother 1993, 27:832–840.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bigby M, Jick S, Jick H, Arndt K: Drug-induced cutaneous reactions. A report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program on 15,438 consecutive inpatients, 1975 to 1982. JAMA 1986, 256:3358–3363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alanko K, Stubb S, Kauppinen K: Cutaneous drug reactions: clinical types and causative agents. A five-year survey of in-patients (1981–1985). Acta Derm Venereol 1989, 69:223–226.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roujeau JC, Stern RS: Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med 1994, 331:1272–1285. A detailed overview of the clinical manifestations of serious cutaneous drug eruptions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, systemic hypersensitivity syndromes, drug-induced vasculitis, warfarin-induced skin necrosis, serum sickness, and angioedema.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coombs RRA, Gell PGH: Classification of Allergic Reactions for Clinical Hypersensitivity and Disease. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Descotes J, Choquet-Kastylevsky G: Gell and Coombs’s classification: is it still valid? Toxicology 2001, 158:43–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wintroub BU, Stern R: Cutaneous drug reactions: pathogenesis and clinical classification. J Am Acad Dermatol 1985, 13(2 Pt 1):167–179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knowles SR, Uetrecht J, Shear NH: Idiosyncratic drug reactions: the reactive metabolite syndromes. Lancet 2000, 356:1587–1591. An excellent discussion on idiosyncratic drug reactions and the role of the metabolites of the drugs in the pathogenesis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pirmohamed M, Breckenridge AM, Kitteringham NR, Park BK: Adverse drug reactions. BMJ 1998, 316:1295–1298.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma VK, Dhar S: Clinical pattern of cutaneous drug eruption among children and adolescents in north India. Pediatr Dermatol 1995, 12:178–183.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nolan L, O’Malley K: Adverse drug reactions in the elderly. Br J Hosp Med 1989, 41:446, 448, 452–457.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pirmohamed M, Park BK: Genetic susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001, 22:298–305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roujeau JC, Huynh TN, Bracq C, et al.: Genetic susceptibility to toxic epidermal necrolysis. Arch Dermatol 1987, 123:1171–1173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schofield JK, Tatnall FM, Brown J, et al.: Recurrent erythema multiforme: tissue typing in a large series of patients. Br J Dermatol 1994, 131:532–535.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Atkin PA, Shenfield GM: Medication-related adverse reactions and the elderly: a literature review. Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev 1995, 14:175–191.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gordin FM, Simon GL, Wofsy CB, Mills J: Adverse reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1984, 100:495–499.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Levene G, Baker H: Drug reactions. II. Ampicillin and infectious mononucleosis. Br J Dermatol 1968, 80:417–418.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Morris J: Infectious-mononucleosis rash after talampicillin. Lancet 1976, 1(7956):423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mulroy R: Amoxycillin rash in infectious mononucleosis. Br Med J 1973, 1(852):554.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Booker HE: Idiosyncratic reactions to the antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia 1975, 16:171–181.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kramer MS, Leventhal JM, Hutchinson TA, Feinstein AR: An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. I. Background, description, and instructions for use. JAMA 1979, 242:623–632.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanctot KL, Naranjo CA: Computer-assisted evaluation of adverse events using a Bayesian approach. J Clin Pharmacol 1994, 34:142–147.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore-Robinson M, Warin RP: Effect of salicylates in urticaria. Br Med J 1967, 4:262–264.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Timsit JF, Mion G, Rouyer N, et al.: Bronchopulmonary distress associated with toxic epidermal necrolysis. Intensive Care Med 1992, 18:42–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chosidow O, Delchier JC, Chaumette MT, et al.: Intestinal involvement in drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. Lancet 1991, 337(8746):928.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Revuz J, Penso D, Roujeau JC, et al.: Toxic epidermal necrolysis. Clinical findings and prognosis factors in 87 patients. Arch Dermatol 1987, 123:1160–1165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bauer KA: Coumarin-induced skin necrosis. Arch Dermatol 1993, 129(6):766–768.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Comp PC: Coumarin-induced skin necrosis. Incidence, mechanisms, management and avoidance. Drug Safety 1993, 8:128–135.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Karch FE, Lasagna L: Adverse drug reactions. A critical review. JAMA 1975, 234(12):1236–1241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sogn DD: Penicillin allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984, 74(4 Pt 2):589–593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wide L, Bennich H, Johansson SG: Diagnosis of allergy by an in-vitro test for allergen antibodies. Lancet 1967, 2(7526):1105–1107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harle DG, Baldo BA: Drugs as allergens: an immunoassay for detecting IgE antibodies to cephalosporins. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1990, 92(4):439–444.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ordoqui E, Zubeldia JM, Aranzabal A, et al.: Serum tryptase levels in adverse drug reactions. Allergy 1997, 52(11):1102–1105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Girard M: Conclusiveness of rechallenge in the interpretation of adverse drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1987, 23:73–79.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sacerdoti G, Vozza A, Ruocco V: Identifying skin reactions to drugs. Int J Dermatol 1993, 32:469–479. Describes the various skin manifestations of the drugs and the in vivo and in vitro tests available for their diagnosis.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Alanko K, Stubb S, Reitamo S: Topical provocation of fixed drug eruption. Br J Dermatol 1987, 116:561–567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Camarasa JG: Patch test diagnosis of exfoliative dermatitis due to carbamazepine. Contact Dermatitis 1985, 12:49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ring J, Brockow K, Ollert M, Engst R: Antihistamines in urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy 1999, 29(suppl 1):31–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Heimbach DM, Engrav LH, Marvin JA, et al.: Toxic epidermal necrolysis. A step forward in treatment. JAMA 1987, 257:2171–2175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Demling RH: Burns. N Engl J Med 1985, 313:1389–1398.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Konstantinow A, Muhlbauer W, Balda BR, Ring J: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (drug-induced Lyell’s syndrome). 2. Treatment. Dtsche Med Wochenschr 2001, 126:177–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Weston WL: Steroids in erythema eultiforme (EM). Pediatr Dermatol 2000, 17:75–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Viard I, Wehrli P, Bullani R, et al.: Inhibition of toxic epidermal necrolysis by blockade of CD95 with human intravenous immunoglobulin. Science 1998, 282:490–493. An interesting pilot study showing the clinical efficacy of an intravenous immunoglobulin directed against the lytically active Fas ligand that mediates keratinocyte death.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Loria RC, Finnerty N, Wedner HJ: Successful use of aztreonam in a patient who failed oral penicillin desensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989, 83:735–737.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Vaillant L, Camenen I, Lorette G: Patch testing with carbamazepine: reinduction of an exfoliative dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1989, 125:299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Stark BJ, Earl HS, Gross GN, et al.: Acute and chronic desensitization of penicillin-allergic patients using oral penicillin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987, 79:523–532.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Adkinson NFJ: Drug allergy. In Allergy: Principles and Practice, edn. 5. Edited by Middleton EJ, Reed CE, Ellis EF, et al. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998:1212–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Patterson R, Roberts M, Grammer LC: Insulin allergy: reevaluation after two decades. Ann Allergy 1990, 64:459–462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Smith RM, Iwamoto GK, Richerson HB, Flaherty JP: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole desensitization in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1987, 106:335.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sullivan TJ, Yecies LD, Shatz GS, et al.: Desensitization of patients allergic to penicillin using orally administered betalactam antibiotics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1982, 69:275–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Koopmans PP, van der Ven AJ, Vree TB, van der Meer JW: Pathogenesis of hypersensitivity reactions to drugs in patients with HIV infection: allergic or toxic? AIDS 1995, 9:217–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee BL, Safrin S: Interactions and toxicities of drugs used in patients with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 1992, 14:773–779.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Greenberg RG, Berger TG: Nail and mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation with azidothymidine therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990, 22(2 Pt 2):327–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ferguson GC, Nunn AJ, Fox W, et al.: A second international co-operative investigation into thiacetazone side-effects. Rashes on two thiacetazone containing regimens. Tubercle 1971, 52:166–181.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Roudier C, Caumes E, Rogeaux O, et al.: Adverse cutaneous reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Arch Dermatol 1994, 130:1383–1386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Carr A, Penny R, Cooper DA: Efficacy and safety of rechallenge with low-dose trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole in previously hypersensitive HIV-infected patients. AIDS 1993, 7:65–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Heller HM: Adverse cutaneous drug reactions in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection. Clin Dermatol 2000, 18:485–489. This review describes the various cutaneous manifestations of drugs encountered in HIV patients.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Veenstra J, Veugelers PJ, Keet IP, van der Ven AJ, et al.: Rapid disease progression in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals with adverse reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis. Clin Infect Dis 1997, 24:936–941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babu, K.S., Belgi, G. Management of cutaneous drug reactions. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2, 26–33 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-002-0034-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-002-0034-x

Keywords

Navigation