Skip to main content
Log in

Strategies to Assess and Manage Frailty among Patients Diagnosed with Primary Malignant Brain Tumors

  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Opinion statement

Frailty refers to a biologic process that results in reduced physiologic and functional reserve. Patients diagnosed with primary malignant brain tumors experience high symptom burden from tumor and tumor-directed treatments that, coupled with previous comorbidities, may contribute to frailty. Within the primary malignant brain tumor population, frailty is known to associate with mortality, higher healthcare utilization, and increased risk of postoperative complications. As such, methods to assess and manage frailty are paramount. However, there is currently no clear consensus on how to best assess and manage frailty throughout the entirety of the disease trajectory. Given the association between frailty and health outcomes, more research is needed to determine best practice protocols for the assessment and management of frailty among patients diagnosed with primary malignant brain tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, Cioffi G, Waite KA, Kruchko C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2016–2020. Neuro-Oncology. 2023;25(Supplement_4):iv1–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(suppl_4):iv1–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. ScientificWorldJournal. 2001;1:323–36. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Li D, Yuan Y, Lau YM, Hurria A. Functional versus chronological age: geriatric assessments to guide decision making in older patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(6):e305–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30348-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Dale W, Klepin HD, Williams GR, Alibhai SMH, Bergerot C, Brintzenhofeszoc K, et al. Practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients receiving systemic cancer therapy: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(26):4293–312. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.23.00933. ASCO report that outlines geriatric assessment tools and the outcomes from randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy geriatric-assessment informed management interventions.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dale W, Williams GR, A RM, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Maggiore RJ, Merrill JK, et al. How is geriatric assessment used in clinical practice for older adults with cancer? A survey of cancer providers by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021;17(6):336-44. https://doi.org/10.1200/op.20.00442.

  10. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62(7):722–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.7.722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saliba D, Elliott M, Rubenstein LZ, Solomon DH, Young RT, Kamberg CJ, et al. The Vulnerable Elders Survey: a tool for identifying vulnerable older people in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(12):1691–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Mertens C, Delva F, Fonck M, et al. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2166–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489–95. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Krenzlin H, Jankovic D, Alberter C, Kalasauskas D, Westphalen C, Ringel F, et al. Frailty in glioblastoma is independent from chronological age. Front Neurol. 2021;12: 777120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.777120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Deluche E, Leobon S, Lamarche F, Tubiana-Mathieu N. First validation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool in older patients with glioblastoma. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. 2019;10(1):159–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2018.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider M, Potthoff AL, Scharnbock E, Heimann M, Schafer N, Weller J, et al. Newly diagnosed glioblastoma in geriatric (65 +) patients: impact of patients frailty, comorbidity burden and obesity on overall survival. J Neurooncol. 2020;149(3):421–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03625-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shahrestani S, Lehrich BM, Tafreshi AR, Brown NJ, Lien BV, Ransom S, et al. The role of frailty in geriatric cranial neurosurgery for primary central nervous system neoplasms. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(4):E15. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.7.FOCUS20426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cloney M, D’Amico R, Lebovic J, Nazarian M, Zacharia BE, Sisti MB, et al. Frailty in geriatric glioblastoma patients: a predictor of operative morbidity and outcome. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:362–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.096.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Botros D, Khalafallah AM, Huq S, Dux H, Oliveira LAP, Pellegrino R, et al. Predictors and impact of postoperative 30-day readmission in glioblastoma. Neurosurgery. 2022;91(3):477–84. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Khalafallah AM, Huq S, Jimenez AE, Brem H, Mukherjee D. The 5-factor modified frailty index: an effective predictor of mortality in brain tumor patients. J Neurosurg. 2020;135(1):78–86. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.5.JNS20766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katiyar V, Sharma R, Tandon V, Goda R, Ganeshkumar A, Suri A, et al. Impact of frailty on surgery for glioblastoma: a critical evaluation of patient outcomes and caregivers’ perceptions in a developing country. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(4):E14. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.7.FOCUS20482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Youngerman BE, Neugut AI, Yang J, Hershman DL, Wright JD, Bruce JN. The modified frailty index and 30-day adverse events in oncologic neurosurgery. J Neurooncol. 2018;136(1):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2644-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Richardson AM, McCarthy DJ, Sandhu J, Mayrand R, Guerrero C, Rosenberg C, et al. Predictors of successful discharge of patients on postoperative day 1 after craniotomy for brain tumor. World Neurosurg. 2019;126:e869–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Harland TA, Wang M, Gunaydin D, Fringuello A, Freeman J, Hosokawa PW, et al. Frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes in brain tumor patients. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e813–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huq S, Khalafallah AM, Jimenez AE, Gami A, Lam S, Ruiz-Cardozo MA, et al. Predicting postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients with a 5-factor modified frailty index. Neurosurgery. 2020;88(1):147–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Huq S, Khalafallah AM, Patel P, Sharma P, Dux H, White T, et al. Predictive model and online calculator for discharge disposition in brain tumor patients. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e786–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sastry RA, Pertsch NJ, Tang O, Shao B, Toms SA, Weil RJ. Frailty and outcomes after craniotomy for brain tumor. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;81:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonney PA, Chartrain AG, Briggs RG, Jarvis CA, Ding L, Mack WJ, et al. Frailty is associated with in-hospital morbidity and nonroutine disposition in brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomy. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e1045–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang CM, Ma YL, Yang XY, Ji RQ, Gu WJ, Zhou JX. Association of preoperative frailty with postoperative delirium after elective brain tumor resection: retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort. Surgery. 2021;170(6):1763–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. • Thommen R, Kazim SF, Rumalla K, Kassicieh AJ, Kalakoti P, Schmidt MH, et al. Preoperative frailty measured by risk analysis index predicts complications and poor discharge outcomes after Brain Tumor Resection in a large multi-center analysis. J Neurooncol. 2022;160(2):285–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04135-z. Compared the predictive utility of the modified frailty index and risk analysis index among a sample of neuro-oncology patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kassicieh AJ, Rumalla K, Kazim SF, Asserson DB, Schmidt MH, Bowers CA. Preoperative risk model for perioperative stroke after intracranial tumor resection: ACS NSQIP analysis of 30,951 cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2022;53(6):E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.9.Focus22402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmidt AQ, von Euw S, Roy JM, Skandalakis GP, Kazim SF, Schmidt MH, et al. Frailty predicts hospital acquired infections after brain tumor resection: analysis of 27,947 patients’ data from a prospective multicenter surgical registry. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023;229: 107724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. • Huq S, Liu J, Romano R, Seal S, Khalafallah AM, Walston JD, et al. Frailty in patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors: a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2022;166:268-78.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.039. Review that provides an overview of frailty screening tools used within neuro-oncology populations and outlines individual study results.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Qureshi HM, Tabor JK, Pickens K, Lei H, Vasandani S, Jalal MI, et al. Frailty and postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients: a systematic review subdivided by tumor etiology. J Neurooncol. 2023;164(2):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04416-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Song X, MacKnight C, Latta R, Mitnitski AB, Rockwood K. Frailty and survival of rural and urban seniors: results from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2007;19(2):145–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res. 2013;183(1):104–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor modified frailty index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(2):173-81.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, Blaser C, Carlson MA, Bailey TL, et al. Development and initial validation of the risk analysis index for measuring frailty in surgical populations. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):175–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Goede V. Frailty and cancer: current perspectives on assessment and monitoring. Clin Interv Aging. 2023;18:505–21. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.S365494.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Callahan KE, Clark CJ, Edwards AF, Harwood TN, Williamson JD, Moses AW, et al. Automated frailty screening at-scale for pre-operative risk stratification using the electronic frailty index. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(5):1357–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pajewski NM, Lenoir K, Wells BJ, Williamson JD, Callahan KE. Frailty screening using the electronic health record within a medicare accountable care organization. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(11):1771–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Klepin HD, Isom S, Callahan KE, Pajewski N, Topaloglu U, Wagner LI, et al. Association between an electronic health record (EHR)–embedded frailty index and survival among older adults receiving cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):12009. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.12009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Klepin HD, Isom S, Callahan KE, Pajewski N, Topaloglu U, Wagner LI, et al. Frailty status determined by an electronic health record embedded frailty index and hospitalization risk among older adults following the initiation of cancer chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2023;41(16_suppl):12010. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.12010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lansbury LN, Roberts HC, Clift E, Herklots A, Robinson N, Sayer AA. Use of the electronic Frailty Index to identify vulnerable patients: a pilot study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(664):e751–6. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X693089.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Clegg A, Bates C, Young J, Ryan R, Nichols L, Ann Teale E, et al. Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):353–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Cooper L, Loewenthal J, Frain LN, Tulebaev S, Cardin K, Hshieh TT, et al. From research to bedside: incorporation of a CGA-based frailty index among multiple comanagement services. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(1):90–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mohile SG, Dale W, Somerfield MR, Schonberg MA, Boyd CM, Burhenn PS, et al. Practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients receiving chemotherapy: ASCO guideline for geriatric oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(22):2326–47. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.78.8687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. •• Lorimer CF, Walsh G, MacKinnon M, Corbett A, Bedborough K, Greenwood K, et al. Geriatric assessment of glioblastoma patients is feasible and may provide useful prognostic information. Neurooncol Pract. 2020;7(2):176–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npz040. Prospective study that demonstrated the feasibility of geriatric assessment for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. •• Lombardi G, Bergo E, Caccese M, Padovan M, Bellu L, Brunello A, et al. Validation of the comprehensive geriatric assessment as a predictor of mortality in elderly glioblastoma patients. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11101509. Demonstrated the prognostic value of comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adult patients diagnosed with glioblastoma.

  50. •• Mohile SG, Mohamed MR, Xu H, Culakova E, Loh KP, Magnuson A, et al. Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study. Lancet. 2021;398(10314):1894–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01789-X. Randomized controlled trial of geriatric assessment-informed management intervention.

  51. •• Li D, Sun C-L, Kim H, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Chung V, Koczywas M, et al. Geriatric assessment–driven intervention (GAIN) on chemotherapy-related toxic effects in older adults with cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncology. 2021;7(11):e214158-e. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4158 .  Randomized controlled trial of geriatric assessment-informed management intervention.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.E.E. wrote the main manuscript. H.D.K. and G.J.L. provided feedback and edits to manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alayna E. Ernster PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki Declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ernster, A.E., Klepin, H.D. & Lesser, G.J. Strategies to Assess and Manage Frailty among Patients Diagnosed with Primary Malignant Brain Tumors. Curr. Treat. Options in Oncol. 25, 27–41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01167-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-023-01167-z

Keywords

Navigation