Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Study on the utility of IRS 1D LISS-III data and the classification techniques for mapping of Sunderban mangroves

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mangrove conservation and management is a stupendous task chiefly due to the inaccessibility and the hostile substrate conditions. Remote sensing technology serves as an important tool in providing fast, accurate and up-to-date baseline information on the status of mangroves. It is almost impossible to carry out conventional field surveys in these swampy areas. The present study aims at the classification and mapping of the mangroves in Sunderban Biosphere Reserve (SBR) in the West Bengal province of India using IRS 1D LISS-III satellite data. Different classification approaches, viz., on-screen visual interpretation, supervised and unsupervised classifications were tried. The study showed that four mangroves classes, viz., Avicennia, Phoenix, mixed mangroves, and mangrove scrub and eight non-mangrove classes could be delineated using all the three approaches. All the mangrove and non-mangrove classes were field verified and the overall accuracy as well as user’s and producer’s accuracies for each category were determined. It was observed that among the three approaches, on-screen visual interpretation yielded higher classification accuracy (91.67%) compared to supervised (79.90%) and unsupervised classifications (71.08%). The results obtained through on-screen visual interpretation showed that all mangrove categories together cover 23.21% of the total geographical area of SBR, of which the mixed mangrove category covers maximum area (18.31%). Among the non-mangrove classes, the waterbody occupies largest area (35.36%) followed by agriculture (34.51%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2008) State of forest report 2005. Forest survey of India, ministry of environment and forests. Govt. of India, Dehradun

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschbacher J, Ofren RS, Delsol JP, Suselo TB, Vibulsresth S, Charrupat T (1995) An integrated comparative approach to mangrove vegetation mapping using remote sensing and GIS technologies: preliminary results. Hydrobiol 295:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AK (1964) Forests of Sundarban. Forest Department, Calcutta, West Bengal, Centenary Volume

  • Banerjee LK (2002) Sundarbans biosphere reserve. In: Singh NP, Singh KP (eds) Floristic diversity and conservation strategies in India, vol. V, Botanical Survey of India. Ministry of Environment and Forests, pp 2801–2829

  • Bina RT, Jara RB, Roque CR (1980) Application of multi-level remote sensing survey to mangrove forest resource management in the Philippines. In: Proceedings Asian Symposium on Mangrove Development, Research and Management, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 28–29 August

  • Blasco F, Lavenu F, Baraza J (1986) Remote sensing data applied to mangroves of Kenya coast. In: Proceedings 20th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment 3:1465–1480

  • Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury MU (1990) Digital analysis of remote sensing data for monitoring the ecological status of the mangrove forests of Sunderbans in Bangladesh. In: Proceedings 23rd International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment 1:493–497

  • Choudhury AB, Chakraborty K (1973) Wild life biology of the Sundarbans forests: a study of the habit and habitat of the tiger. Bull Bot Soc Bengal 23:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutrieux E, Denis J, Populus J (1990) Application of SPOT data to a baseline ecological study the Mahakam Delta mangroves East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Oceanol Acta 13:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi RS, Rao BRM, Bhattacharya S (1999) Mapping wetlands of the Sundarban delta and its environs using ERS-1 SAR data. Int J Remote Sens 20:2235–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eong OJ, Khoon GW, Ping WY, Kheng WH (1992) Identification of mangrove vegetation zones using MicroBRIAN and Landsat imagery. In: Third ASEAN Science and Technology Week Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, University of Singapore, Singapore, pp 383–389

  • Everitt JH, Judd FW (1989) Using remote sensing techniques to distinguish and monitor Black Mangrove—Avicennia germinans. J Coast Res 5:737–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt JH, Escobar DE, Judd FW (1991) Evaluation of airborne video imagery for distinguishing Black Mangrove—Avicennia germinans on the lower Texas Gulf Coast. J Coast Res 7:1169–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2007) The World’s Mangroves 1980–2005. FAO Forestry Paper 153, Rome

  • Gang PO, Agatsiva JL (1992) The current status of mangroves along the Kenyan coast, a case study of Mida Creek mangroves based on remote sensing. Hydrobiol 247:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giri CP, Delsol JP (1993) Mangrove forest for mapping in Phangnga bay, Thailand using SPOT HRV and JERS-I data in conjunction with GIS. In: Proceedings International Seminar on Remote Sensing for Coastal Zone and Coral Reef Applications, AIT, Bangkok, 25 October–1 November, 1993

  • Giri CP, Muhlhausen J (2008) Mangrove forest distributions and dynamics in Madagascar (1975–2005). Sens 8:2104–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray D, Zisman S, Corves C (1990) Mapping of the mangroves of Belize. Technical Report, University of Edinburgh

  • Green EP, Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Clark CD (1996) A review of remote sensing for the assessment and management of tropical coastal resources. Coast Manag 24:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green EP, Clark CD, Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Ellis AC (1998a) Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping. Int J Remote Sens 19:935–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green EP, Mumby PJ, Ellis AC, Edwards AJ, Clark CD (1998b) The assessment of mangrove areas using high resolution multispectral airborne imagery. J Coast Res 14:433–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord RM (1982) Digital image processing of remotely sensed data. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR, Ramset E, Davis BA, Thoemke CW (1991) The measurement of mangrove characteristics in south-west Florida using SPOT multispectral data. Geocarto Int 2:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay RJ, Hick PT, Houghton HJ (1991) Remote sensing of Kimberley rainforests. In: McKenzie NI, Johnston RB, Kendrick PG (eds) Kimberley Rainforests. Surrey Beatty & Sons

  • Kushwaha SPS, Dwivedi RS, Rao BRM (2000) Evaluation of various digital image processing techniques for detection of coastal wetlands using ERS-1 SAR data. Int J Remote Sens 21:565–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (2000) Remote sensing and image interpretation, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Long BG, Skewes TD (1994) GIS and remote sensing improves mangrove mapping. In: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Remote Sensing Conference, Melbourne, pp 545–550

  • Loo MGK, Lim TM, Chou LM (1992) Land use changes of a recreational island as observed by satellite imagery. In: Proceedings Third ASEAN Science and Technology Week Conference, vol. 6, University of Singapore, Singapore, pp 401–405

  • Lorenzo R, deJesus BR, Jara RB (1979) Assessment of mangrove forest deterioration in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines using Landsat MSS data. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment 2:1737–1745

  • Mas J (1999) Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sens 20:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed MIH, Hussein NA, Ibrahim MI, Kuchler DA (1992) Coastal resources mapping of Besut (Terrengganu coast) Malaysia using micro-BRIAN digital mapping technology and Landsat MSS satellite data. In: Proceedings Regional Symposium on Living Resources in Coastal Areas, Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines, pp 545–555

  • Murali RM, Vethamony P, Saran AK, Jayakumar S (2006) Change detection studies in coastal zone features of Goa, India by remote sensing. Curr Sci 91:816–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Naskar KR, Chakraborty NM (1984) Studies on the Economic fauna from the Sundarbans delta in West Bengal. J Indian Soc Coast Agric Res 2:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Naskar KR, Guha Bakshi DN (1982) Joint endeavour for protection of estuarine ecosystems of Sundarbans. In: Abstracts (102) of Sixth National Botanical Conference, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh

  • Palaganas VP (1992) Assessing changes in mangrove forest of Infanta-Real, Quezon Province (Philippines) using remote sensing. Dissertation, University of Newcastle

  • Patterson SG, Rehder JB (1985) An assessment of conversion and loss of mangroves using remote sensing imagery on Marco Island, Florida. In: Proceedings American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp 728–735

  • Populus J, Lantieri D (1991) Use of high resolution satellite data for coastal fisheries. Report 58, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome

  • Ramirez-Garcia P, Lopez-Blanco J, Ocana D (1998) Mangrove vegetation assessment in the Santiago river mouth, Mexico by means of supervised classification using Landsat TM imagery. For Ecol Manag 105:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey EJ, Jensen JR (1996) Remote sensing of mangrove wetlands: relating canopy spectra to site-specific data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 62:939–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath BK, Dutt CBS, Manikiam B (1989) Digital mapping of mangrove in middle Andamans of India. In: Proceedings of the sixth Symposium on Coastal and Ocean Management 1:741–750

  • Reark JB (1975) A history of the colonisation of mangroves on a tract of land on Biscayne Bay, Florida. In: Proceedings International Symposium on the Biology and Management of Mangroves, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, pp 776–804

  • Reddy CS, Pattanaik C, Murthy MSR (2007) Assessment and monitoring of mangroves of Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary, Orissa, India using remote sensing and GIS. Curr Sci 92:1409–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross P (1975) The mangroves of South Vietnam: the impact of military use of herbicides. In: Proceedings International Symposium on the Biology and Management of Mangroves, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, pp 695–709

  • Roy PS (1989) Mangrove vegetation stratification using Salyut 7 photographs. Geocarto Int 3:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saenger P, Hopkins MS (1975) Observations on the mangroves of the southwestern Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. In: Proceedings International Symposium on the Biology and Management of Mangroves, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, pp 126–136

  • Selvam V, Ravichandran KK, Gnanappazham L, Navamuniyammal M (2003) Assessment of community-based restoration of Pichavaram mangrove wetland using remote sensing data. Curr Sci 85:794–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod CL, McMillan C (1981) Black mangrove, Avicennia germinans, in Texas, past and present distribution. Contrib Mar Sci 24:115–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh IJ, Singh SK, Kushwaha SPS, Ashutosh S, Singh RK (2004) Assessment and monitoring of estuarine mangrove forests of Goa using satellite remote sensing. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 32:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Kushwaha SPS, Joshi PK (2006) Mangrove mapping and monitoring. GIM Int 20(3):60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulong I, Lokman MH, Tarmizi K, Ismail A (2002) Mangrove mapping using Landsat imagery and aerial photographs: Kemaman District, Terengganu, Malaysia. In: Dahdouh-Guebas F (ed) Remote Sensing and GIS in the Sustainable Management of Tropical Coastal Ecosystems, Environment, Development and Sustainability 4(2):93–112

  • Tomlinson PB (1986) The botany of mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tou JT, Gonzalez RC (1974) Pattern recognition principles. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheyden A, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Thomaes K, De Genst W, Hettiarachchi S, Koedam N (2002) High-resolution vegetation data for mangrove research as obtained from aerial photography. Environ Dev Sustain 4:113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibulsresth S, Downreang D, Ratanasermpong S, Silapathong C (1990) Mangrove forest zonation by using high resolution satellite data. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, pp 1–6

  • Vits C, Tack J (1995) The use of remote sensing as information source for environmental accounting of coastal areas in Kenja. Feasibility Study Reference No. T3/02/603, University of Ghent, pp 1–45

  • Wang Y, Bonynge G, Nugranad J, Traber M, Ngusaru A, Tobey J, Hale L, Bowen R, Makota V (2003) Remote sensing of mangrove change along the Tanzania Coast. Mar Geod 26:35–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodfine AC (1991) Northeast Sumatra prawn project, remote sensing component. Final Report to Natural Resources Institute/Overseas Development Agency, December 1991

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. P.S. Roy, Dean, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, for the encouragement and support throughout for this study. Thanks are also due to Dr. A.K. Raha, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Government of West Bengal and the officers and staff of SBR for providing the field support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSC), Indian Space Research Organisation, Dehradun, 248001, India

    S. Nandy & S. P. S. Kushwaha

Authors
  1. S. Nandy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. P. S. Kushwaha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Nandy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nandy, S., Kushwaha, S.P.S. Study on the utility of IRS 1D LISS-III data and the classification techniques for mapping of Sunderban mangroves. J Coast Conserv 15, 123–137 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-010-0126-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-010-0126-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation