Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drivers of internationalization success: a conjoint choice experiment on German SME managers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internationalization is a common growth strategy for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, SMEs face several challenges within the internationalization process. As SMEs are characterized by limited resources, managers are constantly involved in a decision-making process concerning the allocation of the SMEs’ resources. Therefore, internationalization can be understood as a complex, multidimensional decision process. Based on a set of 2244 internationalization decisions made by German SME managers, the present study examines how eight strategic and structural factors drive the perceived international success of SMEs. When applying conjoint choice analysis, the results suggest that especially equity financing in the internationalization process, an appropriate market selection as well as proactive motives, and a long-term scope can drive SMEs’ international success. Moreover, it becomes evident that strategic factors are more relevant for successful internationalization than structural factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abor JY, Agbloyor EK, Kuipo R (2014) Bank finance and export activities of Small and Medium Enterprises. Rev Dev Finance 4(2):97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs ZJ, Morck R, Shaver JM, Yeung B (1997) The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: a policy perspective. Small Bus Econ 9(1):7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agndal H, Chetty S (2007) The impact of relationship on changes in internationalization strategies of SMEs. Eur J Mark 41(4):1449–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja G (2000) The dualty of collaboration. Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strateg Manag J 21(3):317–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aivazian VA, Ge Y, Qiu J (2005) The impact of leverage on firm investment: Canadian evidence. J Corp Finance 11(2):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali AJ, Camp RC (1993) The relevance of firm size and international business experience to market entry strategies. J Glob Mark 6(4):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Gabrielsson J, Wictor I (2004) International activities in small firms: examining factors influencing the internationalisation and export growth of small firms. Can J Adm Sci 21(1):22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armario JM, Ruiz DM, Armario EM (2008) Market orientation and internationalization in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Small Bus Manage 46(4):485–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle J, Hitt M, Sirmon D, Very P (2007) The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. J Manage Stud 44(1):73–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle J-L, Naldi L, Nordqvist M, Hitt MA (2012) Internationalization of family-controlled firms: a study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrep Theory Pract 36(6):1115–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmussen CG, Pedersen T, Petersen B (2007) How do we capture ‘global specialization’ when measuring firm’s degree of globalization? Manag Int Rev 47:791–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astrachan J, Shanker M (2003) Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy: a closer look. Fam Bus Rev 16(3):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banalieva ER, Eddleston KA (2011) Home-region focus and performance of family firms: the role of family vs non-family leaders. J Int Bus Stud 42(8):1060–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellone F, Musso P, Nesta L, Schiavo S (2010) Financial constraints and firm export behaviour. World Econ 33(3):347–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik SK, Driffield N, Pal S (2010) ‘Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. J Int Bus Stud 41(4):437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey WJ, Tesar G (1977) The export behavior of smaller Wisconsin manufacturing firms. J Int Bus Stud 9:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley M, Jarrell GA, Kim EH (1984) On the existence of an optimal capital structure: theory and evidence. J Finance 39(3):857–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazell JD, Diener CG, Karniouchina E, Moore WL, Séverin V, Uldry P-F (2006) The no-choice option and dual response choice designs. Mark Lett 17(4):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley PJ (1989) Foreign direct investment by small and medium sized enterprises: the theoretical background. Small Bus Econ 9(2):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley PJ, Devinney T, Louviere J (2007) ‘Do managers behave the way theory suggests? A choice-theoretic examination of foreign direct investment location decision-making. J Int Bus Stud 38(7):1069–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman TA (1996) An empirical examination of multinational corporate capital structure. J Int Bus Stud 27(3):553–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calia P, Ferrante MR (2013) How do firms combine different internationalisation modes? A multivariate probit approach. Rev World Econ 149(4):663–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calof J, Beamish P (1995) Adapting to foreign markets: explaining internationalization. Int Bus Rev 4(2):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calof JL, Viviers W (1995) Internationalization of small and medium sized South African enterprises. J Small Bus Manage 33(4):71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves RE (1971) International corporations: the industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica 38(149):38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil ST (1984a) Organizational characteristics associated with export activities. J Manage Stud 21(1):322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil ST (1984b) Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. J Bus Res 12(2):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerrato D, Piva M (2012) The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: the effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. J Manage Gov 16(4):617–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesinger B, Fink M, Madsen TK, Kraus S (2012) Rapidly internationalizing ventures: how definitions can bridge the gap across contexts. Manag Decis 50(10):1816–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesinger B, Bouncken R, Fredrich V, Kraus S (2014) The alchemy of family enterprises’ internationalisation: dexterous movers or prodigal laggards? Eur J Int Manag 8(6):671–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesinger B, Hughes M, Mensching H, Bouncken R, Fredrich V, Kraus S (2016) A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality. J World Bus 51(4):586–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan PS, Heide D (1993) Strategic alliances in technology: key competitive weapon. Adv Manag J 58(4):9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JP, Cheng A, Jia H, Jawon K (1997) An investigation of the relationship between international activities and capital structure. J Int Bus Stud 28(3):563–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao Y-C, Yang K-P, Yu C-MJ (2006) Performance, internationalization, and firm-specific advantages of SMEs in a newly-industrialized economy. Small Bus Econ 26(5):475–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittenden F, Hall G, Hutchinson P (1996) Small firm growth, access to capital markets and financial structure: review of issues and an empirical investigation. Small Bus Econ 8(1):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua JH, Chrisman JJ, Sharma P (1999) Defining family business by behavior. Entrep Theory Pract 24(4):19–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Claver E, Rienda L, Quer D (2009) Family firms’ international commitment: the influence of family-related factors. Fam Bus Rev 22(2):125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick D, Barr P (2007) SMEs’ barriers towards internationalization and assistance requirements in the UK: differences between exporters and firms employing multiple modes of market entry. J Small Bus Entrep 20(3):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra A, Maloney MM, Manrakhan S (2007) Causes of the difficulties in internationalisation. J Int Bus Stud 38(6):709–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’ Artis K (2010) Structural estimation of variety gains from trade integration in Asia. Aust Econ Rev 43(3):270–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Angelo A, Majocchi A, Zucchella A, Buck T (2013) Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: insights from an Italian sample. Int Mark Rev 30(2):80–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq D, Sapienza HJ, Crijns H (2005) The internationalization of small and medium-sized firms. Small Bus Econ 24(4):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick M, Mitter C, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B, Pernsteiner H (2016) The impact of finance and governance on the internationalisation modes of family firms. Eur Int Manag (forthcoming)

  • Douglas SP, Craig CS, Keegan WJ (1982) Approaches to assessing international marketing opportunities for small and medium-sized companies. Columbia J World Bus 17(3):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Doukas JA, Pantzalis C (2003) Geographic diversification and agency costs of debt of multinational firms. J Corp Finance 9(1):59–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreux DRI (1990) financing family business: alternatives to selling out or going public. Fam Bus Rev 3(3):225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1988) The eclectic paradigm of international production: a restatement and some possible extensions. J Int Bus Stud 19(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1996) The geographical sources of the competitiveness of firms: some results of a new survey. Transnatl Corp 5(3):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Efrat K, Shoham A (2012) Born global firms: the differences between their short- and long-term performance drivers. J World Bus 47(4):675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggers F, Sattler H (2011) Preference measurement with conjoint analysis. Overview of state-of-the-art approaches and recent developments. GfK Mark Intell Rev 3(1):36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers F, Eggers F, Kraus S (2016) Entrepreneurial branding: measuring consumer preferences through choice-based conjoint analysis. Int Entrep Manag J 12(2):427–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad H (2004) Internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: a grounded theoretical framework and an overview. Can J Adm Sci 21(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad H, Wright RW (1999) Internationalization of SMEs: management responses to a changing environment. J Int Mark 7(4):4–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista F (2005) Qualitative insights into the international new venture creation process. J Int Entrep 3(3):179–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabian F, Molina H, Labianca G (2009) Understanding decisions to internationalize by small and medium-sized firms located in an emerging market. Manag Int Rev 49(5):537–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, French KR (2002) Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Rev Financial Stud 15(1):1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez Z, Nieto MJ (2005) Internationalization strategy of small and medium-sized family businesses. Fam Bus Rev 18(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher D (2004) International entrepreneurship and the small business. Entrep Reg Dev 16(4):289–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman J, Styles C, Lawley M (2012) Does firm location make a difference to the export performance of SMEs? Int Mark Rev 29(1):88–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frishammar J, Andersson S (2009) The overestimated role of strategic orientations for international performance in smaller firms. J Int Entrep 7(1):57–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gankema HGJ, Snuif HR, Zwart PS (2000) The internationalization process of small and medium-sized enterprises: an evaluation of stage theory. J Small Bus Manage 38(4):15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C (1989) Consumer trends in the EC: how can retailers respond?. Longman Group, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes L, Ramaswamy K (1999) An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. J Int Bus 30:173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves C, Thomas J (2008) Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: an examination of family influence. Fam Bus Rev 21(2):151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves C, Shan YC (2014) An empirical analysis of the effect of internationalization on the performance of unlisted family and nonfamily firms in Australia. Fam Bus Rev 27(2):142–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel A, Höpner M, Kurdelbusch A, Rehder B, Zugehör R (2003) Two dimensions of the internationalization of firms. J Manag Stud 40(3):701–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck RKZ, Stafford K (2001) The vital institution of family business: economic benefits hidden in plain sight. In: McCann GK, Upton N (eds) Destroying myths and creating value in family business. Stetson University Press, Deland, pp 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart J-F (2007) The theoretical rationale for a multinationality/performance relationship. Manag Int Rev 47(3):423–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Read Psychol Cult 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1014

  • Huber J, Zwerina K (1996) The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. J Mark Res 33(3):307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ietto-Gillies G (1998) Different conceptual frameworks for the assessment of the degree of internationalisation: an empirical analysis of various indices for the top 100 transnational corporations. Transnatl Corp 7(1):17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ietto-Gillies G, London SE (2009) Conceptual issues behind the assessment of the degree of internationalization. Transnatl Corp 18(3):59–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaw Y-L, Cheng C-L (2006) The influence of the Internet in the internationalization of SMEs in Taiwan. Hum Syst Manag 25(3):167–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreing market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 18(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1990) The mechanisms of internationalization. Int Mark Rev 7(4):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J Int Bus Stud 40(9):1411–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafouros M, Buckley PJ, Sharp JA, Wang C (2008) The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation 28:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T, Palepu K, Sinha J (2005) Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Bus Rev 83(6):63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35(2):124–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Ambos CT, Eggers F, Cesinger B (2015) Distance and perceptions of risk in internationalization decisions. J Bus Res 68(7):1501–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Meier F, Eggers F, Bouncken R, Schuessler F (2016a) Standardisation vs. adaption: a conjoint experiment on the influence of psychic, cultural and geographical distance on international marketing mix decisions. Eur J Int Manag 10(2):127–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus S, Mensching H, Calabrò A, Cheng CF, Filser M (2016b) Family firm internationalization: a configurational approach. J Bus Res. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.158

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiser PM, Marino LD, Weaver KM (2002) Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: a multi-country analysis. Entrep: Theory Pract 26(4):71–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhfeld WF, Tobias RD, Garratt M (1994) Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J Mark Res 31(4):545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen O, Puumalainen K, Sintonen S, Kyläheiko K (2010) Organisational capabilities and internationalisation of the small and medium-sized information and communication technology firms. J Int Entrep 8(2):135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo A, Kao M-S, Chang Y-C, Chiu C-F (2012) The influence of international experience on entry mode choice: difference between family and non-family firms. Eur Manag J 30(3):248–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou LC (1995) Export stimulation research: review, evaluation and integration. Int Bus Rev 4(2):133–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou LC, Katsikeas CS (1996) The export development process: an integrative review of empirical models. J Int Bus Stud 27(3):517–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman M, Montgomery D (1998) First-mover (dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strateg Manag J 19(12):1111–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman-Yaconi L, Hooper T, Hutchings K (2010) Toward a model of understanding strategic decision-making in micro-firms: exploring the Australian information technology sector. J Small Bus Manage 48(1):70–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liesch PW, Knight GA (1999) Information internalization and hurdle rates in small and medium enterprise internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 30(1):383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohrke FT, Holloway BB, Woolley TW (2010) Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research. Organ Res Methods 13(1):16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD (2000) Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JW, Beamish PW (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strateg Manag J 22(6/7):565–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JW, Beamish P (2006a) SME internationalization and performance: growth vs. profitability. J Int Entrep 4(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JW, Beamish PW (2006b) Partnering strategies and performance of SMEs international joint ventures. J Bus Ventur 21(4):285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Ventur 16(5):429–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon DW, Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2000) Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. J Manag 26(5):1055–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra S, Sivakumar K (2011) Simultanous determination of optimal cultural distance and market potential in international market entry. Int Mark Rev 28(6):601–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandl I (2008) Overview of family business relevant issues. Final report, project on behalf of the european commission. Austrian Institute for SME Research, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl I, Celikel-Esser F (2012) Born global: the potential of job creation in new international businesses. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski C (1977) The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis 8(3):229–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews JA (2002) A resource-based view of schumpeterian economic dynamics. J Evolut Econ 12(1):29–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall P, Oviatt BM (1996) New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: a follow-up study. J Bus Ventur 11(1):23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton R, Bell J (2004) Capital structure and the pace of SME internationalisation. In: Etemad H (ed) International entrepreneurship in small and medium size enterprises: orientation, environment and strategy. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, pp 57–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensching H, Calabrò A, Eggers F, Kraus S (2016) Internationalization of family and non-family firms: a conjoint experiment among CEOs. Eur J Int Manag (in press)

  • Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I (2005) Managing for the long run: lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkov M, Hofstede G (2012) Is national culture a meaningful concept? Cultural values delineate homogeneous national clusters of in-county regions. Cross Cult Res 46(2):133–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra CS, McConaughy DL (1999) Founding family control and capital structure: the risk of loss of control and the aversion to debt. Entrep Theory Pract 23(4):53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitter C, Emprechtinger S (2016) The role of stewardship in the internationalisation of family firms. Int J Entrep Ventur (forthcoming)

  • Mitter C, Duller C, Feldbauer-Durstmüller B, Kraus S (2014) Internationalization of family firms: the effect of ownership and governance. RMS 8(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen O, Servais P (2002) Born global or gradual global? Examining the behavior of small and medium-sized enterprises. J Int Mark 10(3):49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Bullón F, Sánchez-Bueno MJ (2012) Do family ties shape the performance consequences of diversification? Evidence from the European Union. J World Bus 47(3):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustakallio M, Autio E, Zahra SA (2002) Relational and contractual governance in family firms: effects on strategic decision making. Fam Bus Rev 15(3):205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers SC (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5(2):147–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakos G, Brouthers KD, Brouthers LE (1998) The impact of firm and managerial characteristics on small and medium-sized Greek firms’ export performance. J Glob Mark 11(4):23–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naldi L, Nordqvist M (2008) Family firms venturing into international markets: a resource dependence perspective. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, pp 395–413. MA: Babson College, Wellesley

  • Naldi L, Nordquist M, Sjoeberg K, Wiklund J (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation. Risk taking and performance in family firms. Fam Bus Rev 20(1):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nocco A, Ottaviano GIP, Salto M (2014) Monopolistic competition and optimum product selection. Am Econ Rev 104(5):304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Cass A, Weerawerdena J (2009) Examining the role of international entrepreneurship, innovation and international market performance in SME internationalisation. Eur J Mark 43(11/12):1325–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orengo KM (2012) Internationalization and entrepreneurial orientation. A network perspective: four cases of Puerto Rican SMEs’. AD-Minister 21:55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Suh J, Yeung B (2013) Do multinational and domestic corporations differ in their leverage policies? J Corp Finance 20:115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW (2001) The resource-based view and international business. J Manag 27(6):803–829

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutziouris PZ (2001) The views of family companies on venture capital: empirical evidence from the UK small to medium-size enterprising economy. Fam Bus Rev 14(3):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond L, St-Pierre J, Uwizeyemungu S, Dinh TL (2014) Internationalization capabilities of SMEs: a comparative study of the manufacturing and industrial service sectors. J Int Entrep 12(3):230–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riahi-Belkaoui A (1998) The effects of the degree of internationalization on firm performance. Int Bus Rev 7(3):315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripollés-Meliá M, Menguzzato-Boulard M, Sánchez-Peinado L (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation and international commitment. J Int Entrep 5(1):65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano CA, Tanewski GA, Smyrnios KX (2001) Capital structure decision making: a model for family businesses. J Bus Ventur 16(3):285–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi PE, Allenby GM (1993) A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. J Mark Res 30(2):171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman AM (1981) Inside the multinationals: the economics of internal markets. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman AM, Oh CH (2011) Multinational enterprises and regional economic integration: rethinking key metrics in international business. In: International handbook on the economics of integration, vol III. Edward Elgar Publishing

  • Sanders G, Carpenter MA (1998) Internationalization and firm governance: the roles of CEO compensation, top team composition and board structure. Acad Manag J 41(2):158–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza HJ, Autio E, George G, Zahra SA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):914–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer R (2012) SMEs and networks: overcoming the liability of outsidership. J Int Entrep 11(1):80–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer R, Vahlne JE, Johanson J (2010) Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. J Int Entrep 8(4):343–370. doi:10.1007/s10843-010-0064-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciascia S, Mazzola P, Astrachan J, Pieper T (2012) The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: exploring nonlinear effects. Small Bus Econ 38(1):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P (2004) An overview of the field of family business studies: current status and directions for the future. Fam Bus Rev 17(1):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham A, Albaum G (1995) Reducing the impact of barriers to exporting: a managerial perspective. J Int Mark 3(4):85–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon D, Hitt MA (2003) Managing resources: linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrep Theory Pract 27(4):339–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer L (2009) Degree of internationalization – a multidimensional challenge. J Appl Bus Res 25(3):93–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieg P, Kraus S, Bouncken RB (2014) Assessing the landscape of SME internationalization: a review of existing literature. J Int Bus 14(3):173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. In: March JG (ed) Handbook of organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 142–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strateg Manag J 21(8):791–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan A, Brewer P, Liesch PW (2007) Before the first export decision: internationalisation readiness in the pre-export phase. Int Bus Rev 16(3):294–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatoglu E, Demirbag M, Kaplan G (2003) Motives for retailer internationalization to Central and Eastern Europe. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 39(4):40–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Knox S (1991) The single European grocery market: prospects for channel crossing. Eur Manag J 9(1):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen S, Pedersen T (2000) Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strateg Manag J 21(6):689–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trudgen R, Freeman S (2014) Measuring the performance of born-global firms throughout their development process: the roles of initial market selection and internationalisation speed. Manag Int Rev 54(4):551–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and development (UNCTAD) (2007) The Universe of the largest transnational corporations. UNCTAD current studies on FDI and development, no 3. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman S, Van de Ven AH, Buckeye J, Hudson R (1990) Starting up in a turbulent environment: a process model of failure among firms with high customer dependence. J Bus Ventur 5(5):277–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon R (1971) Sovereignty at bay: the multinational spread of US enterprise. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwaal E, Donkers B (2002) Firm size and export intensity: solving an empirical puzzle. J Int Bus Stud 33(3):603–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wlömert N, Eggers F (2016) Predicting new service adoption with conjoint analysis: external validity of BDM-based incentive-aligned and dual-response choice designs. Mark Lett 27(1):195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi JM, Kraus S, Filser M, Kellermanns FW (2015) Mapping the field of family business research: past trends and future directions. Int Entrep Manag J 11(1):113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie YH, Suh T (2014) Perceived resource deficiency and internationalization of small- and medium-sized firms. J Int Entrepr 12(3):207–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad Manag J 38(2):341–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer S, Mosakowski E (1997) The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services. Strateg Manag J 18(6):439–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (2003) International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses: the effect of ownership and involvment. J Bus Ventur 18(4):495–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra S (2005) A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36(1):20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Wu A, Barnes BR (2012) The effects of early internationalization on performance outcomes in young international ventures: the mediating role of marketing capabilities. J Int Mark 20(4):882–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou S, Stan S (1998) The determinants of export performance: a review of the empirical literature between 1987 and 1997. Int Mark Rev 15(5):333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuchella A, Scabini P (2007) International entrepreneurship, theoretical foundations and practices. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project is supported by the International University of Lake Constance (IBH). The International University of Lake Constance is a network of 30 universities and colleges located in Austria, Germany, the Principality of Liechtenstein and Switzerland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Kraus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kraus, S., Mitter, C., Eggers, F. et al. Drivers of internationalization success: a conjoint choice experiment on German SME managers. Rev Manag Sci 11, 691–716 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0201-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0201-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation