Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Parent’s use of the Internet in the search for healthcare information and subsequent impact on the doctor–patient relationship

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Internet is an unavoidable source of healthcare information. This information, both reliable and unreliable, has previously been shown to influence carer’s decisions.

Aims

Our aim was to evaluate this information seeking behavior among parents and its subsequent potential impact on the doctor–patient relationship.

Method

We undertook a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of paediatric outpatients. Enrollment took place over 4 weeks in March 2015. There were no inclusion or exclusion criteria and enrollment was voluntary. In total 100 questionnaires were completed.

Results

General Practitioners were the most common source of healthcare information. The Internet ranked third as a reliable source of healthcare information. The Internet was commonly used as an educational resource to learn about causes, treatment, and medications. A significant percentage of our population expressed concern regarding Internet information reliability. A small percentage of parents were concerned that disclosing Internet usage may worsen the relationship with their doctor.

Conclusions

Parents showed a willingness to learn about diseases and treatments, and felt that the Internet was a good resource to do so. This study shows that open discussion about Internet usage between parents and doctors is not common and carers feel at risk of judgment should they admit to Internet usage. The Internet should be seen as a positive adjunct to patient education which can improve understanding, thus strengthening the doctor–patient relationship. The Internet will never replace the role of healthcare professionals but must be seen as an integral part of a multi-disciplinary approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wald HS, Dube CE, Anthony DC (2007) Untangling the web—the impact of internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 68(3):218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Griffits F, Cave J, Boardman F et al (2012) Social networks—the future for health care delivery. Social Sci Med 75(12):2233–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kind T, Huang ZJ, Farr D et al (2005) Internet and computer access and use for health information in an underserved community. Ambul Pediatr 5(2):117–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohall AT, Cohall R, Dye B et al (2004) Parents of urban adolescents in Harlem, New York, and the internet: a cross-sectional survey on preferred resources for health information. J Med Internet Res 6(4):e43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kivits J (2006) Informed patients and the internet: a mediated context for consultations with health professional. J Health Psychol 11(2):269–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McMullan M (2006) Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns 63(1–2):24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tuffrey C, Finlay F (2002) Use of the internet by parents of paediatric outpatients. Arch Dis Child 87(6):534–536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Alessandro DM, Kreiter CD, Kinzer SL et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial of an information prescription for pediatric patient education on the internet. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158(9):857–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouche G, Migeot V (2008) Parental use of the internet to seek health information and primary care utilisation for their child: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 28(8):300. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll AE, Zimmerman FJ, Rivara FP et al (2005) Perceptions about computers and the internet in a pediatric clinic population. Ambul Pediatr 5(2):122–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandolfini C, Impicciatore P, Bonati M (2000) Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children. Pediatrics 105(1):e1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N et al (1997) Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ 314(7098):1875–1879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR (2002) Two wrongs don’t make a right: harm aggravated by inaccurate information on the Internet. Pediatrics 109(3):522–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mukhopadhyay RS, Waller A, Franklin VL (2008) What do UK children;s hospital websites offer patients and families? Arch Dis Child 93:179–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roche MI, Skinner D (2009) How parents search, interpret, and evaluate genetic information obtained from the internet. J Genet Couns. 18(2):119–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Harvey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have read and understood IJMS policy on declaration of interests and declare that we have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harvey, S., Memon, A., Khan, R. et al. Parent’s use of the Internet in the search for healthcare information and subsequent impact on the doctor–patient relationship. Ir J Med Sci 186, 821–826 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1555-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1555-6

Keywords

Navigation