Abstract
Background
The combination chemotherapy regimen of streptozocin and 5-fluorouracil (FU/STZ) has been used for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Aim
The aim of this study was to analyse the use of this regimen in a tertiary oncology referral centre over a 10-year period.
Method
We retrospectively analysed nine cases from February 2000 to May 2010. Patient demographics, chemotherapy schedule, toxicities, progression-free and overall survival were tabulated for each patient.
Result
The median progression-free survival was 17 months (range 3–48+ months), and overall survival 31 months (range 12–53+ months) with no toxicity related deaths.
Conclusion
FU/STZ was a well-tolerated regimen that produced significant benefit in the setting of metastatic and progressive disease. Our case series demonstrated comparable progression-free survival and overall survival in relation to randomized controlled studies and previous case series.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold R, Rinke A, Schmidt C, Hofbauer L (2005) Endocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract: chemotherapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 19:649–665
Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S (2010) The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 39:707–712
Öberg K (2010) Pancreatic endocrine tumors. Semin Oncol 37:561–594
Basu B, Sirhoni B, Corrie P (2008) Systemic therapy for neuroendocrine tumours of gastroenteropathic origin. Endocr Relat Cancer 17:75–90
Broder LE, Carter SK (1973) Pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. II. Results of therapy with streptozotocin in 52 patients. Ann Intern Med 79:108–118
Sun W, Lipsitz S, Catalano P, Maillaird JA, Haller DG (2003) Phase II/III study of doxorubicin with fluorouracil compared with streptozocin with fluorouracil or dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced carcinoid tumours: ECOG Group Study E1281. J Clin Oncol 23:4897–4904
Moertel CG, Hanley JA, Johnson LA (1980) Streptozocin alone compared with streptozocin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 303:1189–1194
Moertel CG, Lefkopoulo M, Lipsitz S, Hahn RG, Klaassen D (1998) Streptozocin–doxorubicin, streptozocin–fluorouracil or chlorozotocin in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 326:519–523
Moertel CG, Johnson CM, McKusick MA et al (1994) The management of patients with advanced carcinoid tumours and islet cell carcinomas. Ann Intern Med 120:302–309
La Rosa S, Uccella S, Finzi G, Albarello L, Sessa F, Capella C (2003) Localisaton of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in digestive endocrine tumours: correlation with microvessel density and clinicopatologic features. Hum Pathol 34:18–27
Raymond E, Dahan L, Raoul JL et al (2011) Sunitinib malate for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. N Engl J Med 364:501–513
Phan A, Yao J, Fogelman D. (2010) A prospective, multi-institutional phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) and depot octreotide in advanced low-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma J Clin Oncol 28 (absract)
Hobday TJ, Rubin J, Holen K, Picus J, Donehower R, Marschke R, Maples W, Lloyd R, Mahoney M, Erlichman C (2007) MC044 h, a phase II trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic neuroendocine tumors: a phase II consortium study [abstract]. ASCO Annual Meeting Proc 25:4505a
Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T et al (2011) Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. N Engl J Med 364:514–523
O’Donnell PH, Ratatin MJ (2007) Evaluating the activity of temsirolimus in neuroendocrine cancer. Br J Cancer 177:177–179
Castellano D (2011) Sorafenib and bevacizumab combination targeted therapy in advanced neuroendocrine tumor: a phase II study of the Spanish Neuroendocrine Tumor Group (GETNE0801)
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naidoo, J., O’Toole, D., Kennedy, M.J. et al. A single institution experience of streptozocin/fluorouracil combination chemotherapy: a case series. Ir J Med Sci 181, 211–214 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0780-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0780-7