Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The rehabilitation of patients for total hip arthroplasty is unsatisfactory, especially the prolonged rehabilitation.

Aims

To explore indications and key points of anterolateral minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

110 patients admitted for unilateral total hip arthroplasty were randomly selected for surgery with either anterolateral minimally-invasive incision or standard posterolateral incision. Demographic data, perioperative index and postoperative function index were recorded and statistically analyzed.

Results

No significant difference was detected in operation time, abduction angle, anteversion angle, stem alignment and stem fixation. The incision length, blood loss, perioperative transfusion and 100-mm VAS score at the first 24 h in minimally-invasive group were significantly lower. The Harris hip score and Barthel index were significantly higher in minimally-invasive group at 3 months’ follow-up, but not significantly different 3 years after operation.

Conclusions

There are fewer traumas, fewer blood losses and more rapid recovery in this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schofield SF (2004) Minimally invasive surgery for hip replacement. ANZ J Surg 74:287–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertin KC, Röttinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:248–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B (2004) Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:164–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger RA (2004) The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 53:149–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein WM, Branson JJ (2004) Posterior-lateral approach to minimal incision total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 35:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR (2002) Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 25(10):1031–1043

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cameron HU (2002) Mini-incisions: visualization is key. Orthopedics 25(5):473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ et al (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18(2):123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI et al (2000) Mortality after total hip replacement: 0–10-year follow-up of 39, 543 patients in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 71:19–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Knutsson S, Engberg IB (1999) An evaluation of patients’ quality of life before, 6 weeks and 6 months after total hip replacement surgery. J Adv Nurs 30:1349–1359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borghi B, Casati A (2000) Incidence and risk factors for allogenic blood transfusion during major joint replacement using an integrated autotransfusion regimen. Eur J Anaesthesiol 17:411–4117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorr LD (2005) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sculco TP (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty 19:78–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N et al (2004) Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:214–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N et al (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P et al (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:701–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Meneghini RM et al (2004) Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:239–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Howell JR, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am 35:107–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS et al (2003) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg 85:39–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Waldman BJ (2003) Advancements in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 26:s833–s836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, C., Zhu, Q., Han, Y. et al. Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ir J Med Sci 179, 285–290 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0437-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0437-y

Keywords

Navigation