Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Importance of Powertrain Downsizing in a Benefit–Cost Analysis of Vehicle Lightweighting

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reducing vehicle weight is an important avenue to improve energy efficiency and decrease greenhouse gas emissions from our cars and trucks. Conventionally, models have estimated acceptable increased manufacturing cost as proportional to the lifetime fuel savings associated with reduced vehicle weight. Vehicle lightweighting also enables a decrease in powertrain size and significant reductions in powertrain cost. Accordingly, we propose and apply a method for calculating the maximum net benefits and breakeven cost of vehicle lightweighting that considers both efficiency and powertrain downsizing for a conventional internal combustion engine vehicle, a battery electric vehicle with a range of 300 miles (BEV300), and a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV). We find that excluding powertrain downsizing cost savings undervalues the potential total net benefits of vehicle lightweighting, especially for the BEV300 and FCEV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.J. Joost, JOM 64, 1032 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11837-012-0424-z.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Mascarin, T. Hannibal, A. Raghunathan, Z. Ivanic, and J. Francfort, Vehicle Lightweighting: 40% and 45% Weight Savings Analysis: Technical Cost Modeling for Vehicle Lightweighting. Idaho National Laboratory: INL/EXT-14-33863 (2015). doi:10.2172/1186760.

  3. H. Hakamada, T. Furuta, Y. Chino, Y. Chen, H. Kusuda, and M. Mabuchi, Energy 32, 1352 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y.S. Song, J.R. Youn, and T.G. Gutowski, Compos. A 40, 1257 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.05.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.A. Witik, J. Payet, V. Michaud, C. Ludwig, and J.-A.E. Manson, Compos. A 42, 1694 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A.T. Mayyas, A. Qattawi, A.R. Mayyas, and M.A. Omar, Energy 39, 412 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.12.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H.C. Kim and T.J. Wallington, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 6089 (2013). doi:10.1021/es3042115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Light-Duty Vehicle Mass Reduction and Cost Analysis—Midsize Crossover Utility Vehicle: EPA-420-R-12-026 (2012).

  9. N.P. Lutsey, Review of technical literature and trends related to automobile mass-reduction technology. University of California, Davis: UCD-ITS-RR-10-10 (2010).

  10. D. MacKenzie, S. Zoepf, and J. Heywood, Int. J. Veh. Des. 65, 73 (2014). doi:10.1504/IJVD.2014.060066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Moawad, N. Kim, N. Shidore, and A. Rousseau, Assessment of Vehicle Sizing, Energy Consumption and Cost through Large Scale Simulation of Advanced Vehicle Technologies. Argonne National Laboratory: ANL/ESD-15/28 (2016). doi:10.2172/1245199.

  12. National Research Council, Cost, Effectiveness, and Deployment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles (2015). doi:10.17226/21744.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA

    J. Ward, D. Gohlke & R. Nealer

Authors
  1. J. Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Gohlke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Nealer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ward.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 232 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, J., Gohlke, D. & Nealer, R. The Importance of Powertrain Downsizing in a Benefit–Cost Analysis of Vehicle Lightweighting. JOM 69, 1065–1070 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2330-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2330-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation