Abstract
The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov), is a small grains pest of worldwide economic importance. The Russian wheat aphid is polyphagous and may encounter differential selective pressures from noncultivated grass hosts. Aphid biotypic diversity can disrupt the progress of plant breeding programs, leading to a decreased ability to manage this pest. The goal of this research was to quantify Russian wheat aphid biotype 2 (RWA2) reproductive and development rates on five common noncultivated grass hosts to gain information about host quality, potential refuges, and sources of selection pressure. First, RWA2 reproduction was compared on crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum, (L.) Gaertn.), intermediate wheatgrass (Elytrigia intermedia, (Host) Nevski), slender wheatgrass (Elymus trachycaulus, (Link) Gould ex Shinners), western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithi, (Rydb.) A. Löve), and foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum, (L.) Tesky) at 18–24°C. Second, RWA2 reproduction was compared on intermediate and crested wheatgrass at three temperature regimes 13–18°C, 18–24°C, and 24–29°C. At moderate temperatures (18–24°C), the intrinsic rate of increase values for all five hosts ranged from 0.141 to 0.199, indicating the possibility for strong population sources on all tested hosts. Aphids feeding on crested and intermediate wheatgrass at the 13–18°C temperature had lower fecundity, less nymph production days, longer generational times, and lower intrinsic rate of increase than aphids feeding at the 18–24°C temperature regime. Aphids feeding at 24–29°C did not survive long enough to reproduce. The positive intrinsic rates of increase in Russian wheat aphid on the wheatgrasses suggest that these grasses can support aphid populations at moderate to low temperatures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anstead JA, Burd JD, Shufran KA (2003) Over-summering and biotypic diversity of Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae) populations on non- cultivated grass hosts. Environ Entomol 32(3):662–667
Behle RW, Michels GJ (1990) Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera, Aphididae) development, reproduction, and survival on wheat and rye grown in 4 host-plant media. Southwestern Entomol 15:109–121
Birch LC (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Animal Ecol 17:15–26
Burd JD, Porter DR (2006) Biotypic diversity in greenbug (Hemiptera:Aphididae): characterizing new virulence and host associations. J Econ Entomol 99(3):959–965
Burd JD, Butts RA, Elliot NC, Shufran KA (1998) Seasonal development, overwintering biology, and host plant interactions of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in North America. In: Quisenberry SS, Peairs FB (eds) A response model for an introduced pest—the Russian wheat aphid. Thomas Say Publ. in Entomol., Entomol. Soc. Amer., Lanham, MD, pp 65–99
Donahue JD, Brewer MJ, Burd JD (2000) Relative suitability of crested wheatgrass and other perennial grass hosts for the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol 93(2):323–330
Girma M, Wilde G, Reese JC (1990) Influence of temperature and plant-growth stage on development, reproduction, life-span, and intrinsic rate of increase of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ Entomol 19:1438–1442
Haley SD, Peairs FB, Walker CB, Rudolph JB, Randolph TL (2004) Occurrence of a new Russian wheat aphid biotype in Colorado. Crop Sci 44:1589–1592
Hawley CJ, Peairs FB, Randolph TL (2003) Categories of resistance at different growth stages in Halt, a winter wheat resistant to the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol 96(1):214–219
Merrill SC, Peairs FB, Miller HR, Randolph TL, Rudolph JB, Talmich EE (2008) Reproduction and development of Russian wheat aphid biotype 2 on crested wheatgrass, intermediate wheatgrass, and susceptible and resistant wheat. J Econ Entomol 101(2):541–545
Merrill SC, Holtzer TO, Peairs FB (2009) Diuraphis noxia reproduction and development with a comparison of intrinsic rates of increase to other important small grain aphids: a meta-analysis. Environ Entomol 38:1061–1068
Morrison WP, Peairs FB (1998) Response model concept and economic impact. In Quisenberry SS, Peairs FB(eds) A response model for an introduced pest—the Russian wheat aphid. Thomas Say Publ. in Entomol., Entomol. Soc. Amer., Lanham, MD, pp 1–11
Ni XZ, Quisenberry SS (1997) Effects of wheat leaf epicuticular structure on host selection and probing rhythm of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J Econ Entomol 90:1400–1407
Porter DR, Burd JD, Shufran KA, Webster JA, Teetes GL (1997) Greenbug (Homoptera: Aphididae) biotypes: selected by resistant cultivars or pre-adapted opportunists? J Econ Entomol 90(5):1055–1065
Randolph TL, Merrill SC, Peairs FB (2008) Reproductive rates of Russian wheat aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) biotypes 1 and 2 on a susceptible and a resistant wheat at three temperature regimes. J Econ Entomol 101(3):955–958
Randolph T, Weiland A, Peairs F, Walker C, Pucherelli S (2011) Occurrence of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) on non-cultivated grasses within Colorado montane environments. Colorado State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin TB11-01:1–19
SAS Institute (2005) Statistics and graphics guide. Version 9. SAS Inst, Cary, NC
Weiland AA, Peairs FB, Randolph TL, Rudolph JB, Haley SD, Puterka GJ (2008) Biotypic diversity in Colorado Russian wheat aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) populations. J Econ Entomol 101(2):569–574
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Jeff Rudolph for maintaining the RWA2 colony. This research was supported by the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station Project 646, Biology and Management of Russian Wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov), in Colorado.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Michael Smith.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pucherelli, S.F., Peairs, F.B., Merrill, S.C. et al. Russian wheat aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) reproduction and development on five noncultivated grass hosts. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 6, 67–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9152-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-011-9152-5