Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic optimization of neural network and fuzzy logic for oil bubble point pressure modeling

  • Separation Technology, Thermodynamics
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bubble point pressure is a critical pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) property of reservoir fluid, which plays an important role in almost all tasks involved in reservoir and production engineering. We developed two sophisticated models to estimate bubble point pressure from gas specific gravity, oil gravity, solution gas oil ratio, and reservoir temperature. Neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system are powerful tools for extracting the underlying dependency of a set of input/output data. However, the mentioned tools are in danger of sticking in local minima. The present study went further by optimizing fuzzy logic and neural network models using the genetic algorithm in charge of eliminating the risk of being exposed to local minima. This strategy is capable of significantly improving the accuracy of both neural network and fuzzy logic models. The proposed methodology was successfully applied to a dataset of 153 PVT data points. Results showed that the genetic algorithm can serve the neural network and neurofuzzy models from local minima trapping, which might occur through back-propagation algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Danesh, PVT and phase behavior of petroleum reservoir fluids, First Ed., Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. B. Standing, SPE 47-275 (1947).

  3. J. A. Lasater, Trans AIME, 213, 379 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. Glaso, J. Pet. Technol., 32(5), 785 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. A. Al-Marhoun, J. Pet. Technol., 40(5), 650 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. E. Petrosky and F. F. Farshad, SPE 26644 (1993).

  7. B. Dindoruk and P. G. Christman, SPE 71633 (2003).

  8. W. D. McCain Jr., SPE Reservoir Eng., 6(2), 266 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Velarde, T.A. Blasingame and W. D. McCain Jr., J. Can. Pet. Technol., 38(13), 62 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. A. Al-Shammasi, SPE 53185 (1999).

  11. M. Asoodeh and P. Bagheripour, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 45, 45 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Asoodeh and P. Bagheripour, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 90-91, 1 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mohaghegh, J. Pet. Technol., 52, 64 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Asoodeh, Pet. Sci. Technol., 31–39 (2013), DOI:10.1080/10916466. 2010.545783.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Asoodeh and K. Kazemi, Energy Sources, Part A, 35–12 (2013), DOI:10.1080/15567036.2011.574195.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. B. Gharbi and M. Adel, SPE 38099 (1997).

  17. M. A. Al-Marhoun and E. A. Osman, SPE 78592 (2002).

  18. H.M. Goda, E.M. EI-M Shokir, K. A. Fattah and M. H. Sayyouh, SPE 85650 (2003).

  19. S. Dutta and J. P. Gupta, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., (72), 93 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Khoukhi and S. Albukhitan, International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technol., 4(1), 47 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Khoukhi, Comput. Geosci., 44, 109 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O. G. Numbere, I. I. Azuibuike and S. S. Ikiensikimama, Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, Nigeria (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Asoodeh and P. Bagheripour, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 63(5), 11 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. A. Zadeh, Inf. Control., 8(3), 338 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fuzzy logic, Neural Network & GA and Direct Search Toolboxes, MATLAB User’s Guide (2010).

  26. T. Takagi and M. Sugeno, IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern., 15(1), 116 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. Bhatt and H. B. Helle, Geophys. Prospect., 50, 645 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. D. Ostermann, C. A. Ehlig-Economides and O.O. Owalabi, SPE 11703 (1983).

  30. M. Dolka and M. Osman, SPE 21342 (1991).

  31. M. I. Omar and A. C. Todd, SPE 25338-MS (1993).

  32. D. G. Giambattista and M. Villa, SPE 28904 (1994).

  33. A. Kadkhodaie-Illkchi, M.R. Rezaee, H. Rahimpour-Bonab and A. Chehrazi, Comput. Geosci., 36, 2314 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. E. H. Mamdani, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, 1 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. E. H. Mamdani, IEEE Transactions on Computers, 26, 1182 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  36. P.M. Larsen, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 12, 3 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. O. A. Jarrah and A. Halawani, Artif. Intell., 133, 117 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Chiu, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2, 267 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M. S. Chen and S.W. Wang, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 103, 239 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mojtaba Asoodeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Afshar, M., Gholami, A. & Asoodeh, M. Genetic optimization of neural network and fuzzy logic for oil bubble point pressure modeling. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 31, 496–502 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0248-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0248-8

Keywords

Navigation