Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of solvent dearomatization effect in heavy feedstock thermal cracking to light olefin: An optimization study

  • Catalysis, Reaction Engineering
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Response surface method was used to study the effect of aromatic extraction of heavy feedstock in thermal cracking. N-methylpyrrolidone as the solvent performing dearomatization of feedstock was at different temperature and molar solvent to oil ratios. Temperature, flow rate and steam-to-hydrocarbon ratio were in the range of 1,053–1,143 K, 1–2 g/g, and 0.75–1.2 g/min, respectively. From the CCD studies, the effects of flow rate and coil outlet temperature were the key factors influencing the yield of light olefins. Ethylene and propylene yields increased more than 10% by dearomatization. C +5 decreased by 13% on average. Finally, we obtained the single maximum yield of ethylene, propylene, and simultaneous maximum yields for untreated and raffinate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Ren, M. Patel and K. Blok, Energy, 31, 425 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Ghasemi, M. Ismail, S. K. Kamarudin, K. Saeedfar, W. R.W. Daud, S. H. A. Hassan, L. Y. Heng, J. Alam and S. E. Oh, Appl. Energy, 1050 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Ghasemi, S. Shahgaldi, M. Ismail, B. H. Kim, Z. Yaakob and W. R. Wan Daud, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 13746 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Greene, PD 19 (1) Vacuum Gas Oil Cracking (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Suzuki, M. Itoh, M. Mishima, Y. Watanabe and Y. Takegami, Fuel, 60, 961 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. C. E. Van Camp, P. S. Van Damme and G. F. Froment, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 23, 155 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Sie, M. Senden and H. Van Wechem, Catal. Today, 8, 371 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F.W. Skraba, Method and apparatus for pyrolytically cracking hydrocarbons, in, Google Patents (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Depeyre, C. Flicoteaux and C. Chardaire, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 24, 1251 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Rodil, A. Carro, R. Lorenzo and R.C. Torrijos, Analytical Chemistry, 77, 2259 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I.K. Basily, A. L. Shafik, A. A. Sarhan and M. B. Mohamed, Journal of Nanotechnology (2012). DOI:10.1155/2012/439531.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Zou, Q. Lou, S. Mo and S. Feng, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32, 843 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.-c. Liu, B.-x. Shen, D.-q. Wang and J.-h. Dong, J. Petroleum Sci. Eng., 66, 156 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Gaile, V. Somov, G. Zalishchevskii, E. Kaifadzhyan and L. Koldobskaya, Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 79, 590 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. S. El-Gayar, G. Gohar, A. Ibrahim, H. Ibrahim and A. Aly, Fuel Process. Technol., 89, 254 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kukovecz, D. Mehn, E. Nemes-Nagy, R. Szabo and I. Kiricsi, Carbon, 43, 2842 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Sedighi, K. Keyvanloo and J. Towfighi, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27, 1170 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Senol, Measurement, 36, 131 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Keyvanloo, J. Towfighi, S. Sadrameli and A. Mohamadalizadeh, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 87, 224 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Sedighi, M. Ghasemi, S. H. A. Hassan, W.R.W. Daud, M. Ismail and E. Abdallah, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Z. Abghari, J. T. Darian, R. Karimzadeh and M. R. Omidkhah, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25, 681 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. D. Dicholkar, V.G. Gaikar, S. Kumar and R. Natarajan, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. (2013). DOI:10.1021/ie4003238.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. D. Kopinke, G. Bach and G. Zimmermann, J. Analytical and Appl. Pyrolysis, 27, 45 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Kumar and D. Kunzru, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 24, 774 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Akhnazarova and V. Kafarov, Chem. Chem. Eng., Moscow: MIR. Publishers. Moscow (URSS) (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Arteaga, E. Li-Chan, M. Vazquez-Arteaga and S. Nakai, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 5, 243 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. C. Montgomery, Design and analysis of experiments, John Wiley & Sons Inc. (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Ghasemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nouri, M., Sedighi, M., Ghasemi, M. et al. Evaluation of solvent dearomatization effect in heavy feedstock thermal cracking to light olefin: An optimization study. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 1700–1709 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0118-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0118-4

Key words

Navigation