Abstract
The problem of nitrate accumulation in aerobic tank and total nitrogen excessive discharge in effluent was very common in traditional livestock and poultry farming wastewater treatment systems owing to the lengthy process flow and low process control level. A strain LYX of aerobic bacterium was isolated from the activated sludge of a wastewater treatment system in a pig farm, which could remove nitrate effectively in aerobic tank and was identified Pseudomonas mendocina by 16S rRNA sequencing. Under the condition of nitrate as the sole nitrogen source, this strain removed over 90% of NO3−-N with an initial concentration of 110 mg/L under aerobic conditions within 48 hours. Among them, 37.9% of NO3− -N was assimilated into Bio-N, about 51.9% was reduced to gaseous nitrogen and less than 0.5% of nitrogen was replaced by NO3−-N and NH4+-N, 9.7% NO3−-N remained in the effluent at the end. At the same time, four key genes (napA, nirK, norB and nosZ) related to nitrate nitrogen removal were expressed during the denitrification process of P. mendocina LYX, in which the transcription level of the indicator genes of this aerobic denitrifying bacterium (napA) was the highest. In addition, it was found with the 15N tracer technique that inoculation of this strain on sludge increased the amount of nitrogen loss from 9.26 nmol N/(g·h) to 23.835 nmol N/(g·h). Therefore, P. medocina LYX is a potential bioagent for advanced nitrogen removal by assimilating and reducing nitrate simultaneously in aerobic tanks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APAH (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Administration
Bai H, Liao S, Wang A, Huang J, Shu W, Ye J (2019). High-efficiency inorganic nitrogen removal by newly isolated Pannonibacter phragmitetus B1. Bioresource Technology, 271: 91–99
Berks B C, Richardson D J, Robinson C, Reilly A, Aplin R T, Ferguson S J (1994). Purification and characterization of the periplasmic nitrate reductase from Thiosphaera pantotropha. European Journal of Biochemistry, 220(1): 117–124
Bi Z, Wanyan D Q, Li X, Huang Y (2020). Biological conversion pathways of sulfate reduction ammonium oxidation in anammox consortia. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(3): 38
Bouchez T, Patureau D, Delgenès J P, Moletta R (2009). Successful bacterial incorporation into activated sludge flocs using alginate. Bioresource Technology, 100(2): 1031–1032
Bousselhaj K, Fars D, Laghmari A, Nejmeddine A, Ouazzani N, Ciavatta C (2004). Nitrogen fertilizer value of sewage sludge co-composts. Agronomie, 24(8): 487–492
CEPB(China Environmental Protection Bureau) (2002). Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. Beijing: Chinese Environmental Science Press
Henderson S L, Dandie C E, Patten C L, Zebarth B J, Burton D L, Trevors J T, Goyer C (2010). Changes in denitrifier abundance, denitrification gene mRNA levels, nitrous oxide emissions, and denitrification in anoxic soil microcosms amended with glucose and plant residues. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(7): 2155–2164
Hu Z, Zhang J, Li S, Xie H (2013). Impact of carbon source on nitrous oxide emission from anoxic/oxic biological nitrogen removal process and identification of its emission sources. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 20(2): 1059–1069
Khardenavis A A, Kapley A, Purohit H J (2007). Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by diverse Diaphorobacter sp. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 77(2): 403–409
Knapp C W, Dodds W K, Wilson K C, O’brien J M, Graham D W (2009). Spatial heterogeneity of denitrification genes in a highly homogenous urban stream. Environmental Science & Technology, 43 (12): 4273–4279
Lei X, Jia Y, Chen Y, Hu Y (2019). Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification without nitrite accumulation by a novel isolated Ochrobactrum anthropic LJ81. Bioresource Technology, 272: 442–450
Li B, Wang Y, Li J, Yang L, Li X, Zhou Z, Li Y, Chen X, Wu L (2019). The symbiosis of anaerobic ammonium oxidation bacteria and heterotrophic denitrification bacteria in a size-fractioned single-stage partial nitrification/anammox reactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 151: 107353
Massara TM, Malamis S, Guisasola A, Baeza J A, Noutsopoulos C, Katsou E (2017). A review on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions during biological nutrient removal from municipal wastewater and sludge reject water. Science of The Total Environment, 596: 106–123
Miyahara M, Kim S W, Fushinobu S, Takaki K, Yamada T, Watanabe A, Miyauchi K, Endo G, Wakagi T, Shoun H (2010). Potential of aerobic denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri TR2 to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 76(14): 4619–4625
Pan Y, Ni B J, Bond P L, Ye L, Yuan Z (2013). Electron competition among nitrogen oxides reduction during methanol-utilizing denitri-fication in wastewater treatment. Water Research, 47(10): 3273–3281
Philippot L (2002). Denitrifying genes in bacterial and Archaeal genomes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta- Gene Structure and Expression, 1577(3): 355–376
Rajta A, Bhatia R, Setia H, Pathania P (2020). Role of heterotrophic aerobic denitrifying bacteria in nitrate removal from wastewater. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 128(5):1261–1278
Takaya N, Catalan-Sakairi M, Sakaguchi Y, Kato I, Zhou Z, Shoun H (2003). Aerobic denitrifying bacteria that produce low levels of nitrous oxide. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69(6): 3152–3157
Su J F, Yang S, Huang T L, Li M, Liu J R, Yao Y X (2020). Enhancement of the denitrification in low C/N condition and its mechanism by a novel isolated Comamonas sp. YSF15. Environmental Pollution, 256: 113294
Sun S, Cheng X, Sun D (2013). Emission of N2O from a full-scale sequencing batch reactor wastewater treatment plant: Characteristics and influencing factors. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 85(7): 545–549
Van Doan T, Lee T K, Shukla S K, Tiedje J M, Park J (2013). Increased nitrous oxide accumulation by bioelectrochemical denitrification under autotrophic conditions: Kinetics and expression of denitrification pathway genes. Water Research, 47(19): 7087–7097
Wood D W, Setubal J C, Kaul R, Monks D E, Kitajima J P, Okura V K, Zhou Y, Chen L S, Wood G E, Almeida N F, Woo L, Chen Y C, Paulsen I T, Eisen J A, Karp P D, Bovee D, Chapman P, Clendenning J, Deatherage G, Gillet W, Grant C, Kutyavin T, Levy R, Li M J, McClelland E, Palmieri A, Raymond C, Rouse G, Saenphimmachak C, Wu Z, Romero P, Gordon D, Zhang S P, Yoo H, Tao Y M, Biddle P, Jung M, Krespan W, Perry M, Gordon-Kamm B, Liao L, Kim S, Hendrick C, Zhao Z Y, Dolan M, Chumley F, Tingey S V, Tomb J F, Gordon M P, Olson M V, Nester E W (2001). The genome of the natural genetic engineer Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science, 294(5550): 2317–2323
Wang X J, Wang W Q, Zhang Y, Sun Z T, Zhang J, Chen G H, Li J (2019) Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by a novel isolated Pseudomonas sp. JQ-H3 using polycaprolactone as carbon source. Bioresource Technology, 288:121506
Wu J, Hong Y, Ye J, Li Y, Liu X, Jiao L, Li T, Li Y, Bin L, Wang Y (2019). Diversity of anammox bacteria and contribution to the nitrogen loss in surface sediment. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 142: 227–234
Xu Z, Dai X, Chai X (2018). Effect of different carbon sources on denitrification performance, microbial community structure and denitrification genes. Science of the Total Environment, 634: 195–204
Yao S, Ni J, Chen Q, Borthwick A G L (2013). Enrichment and characterization of a bacteria consortium capable of heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification at low temperature. Bioresource Technology, 127: 151–157
Zhang J, Jia W, Wang R, Ngo H H, Guo W, Xie H, Liang S (2016). Microbial community characteristics during simultaneous nitrification-denitrification process: Effect of COD/TP ratio. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(3): 2557–2565
Zhang M Y, Pan L Q, Liu L P, Su C, Dou L, Su Z P, He Z Y (2020). Phosphorus and nitrogen removal by a novel phosphate-accumulating organism, Arthrobacter sp. CEPF HHEP5 capable of heterotrophic nitrificationaerobic denitrification: Safety assessment, removal characterization, mechanism exploration and wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 312:123633
Zhang Q L, Liu Y, Ai G M, Miao L L, Zheng H Y, Liu Z P (2012). The characteristics of a novel heterotrophic nitrification—aerobic denitrification bacterium, Bacillus methylotrophicus strain L7. Bioresource Technology, 108(3): 35–44
Zhang Y, Wang Y Y, Yan Y, Han H C, Wu M (2019). Characterization of CANON reactor performance and microbial community shifts with elevated COD/N ratios under a continuous aeration mode. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(1): 7
Zhao B, He Y L, Hughes J, Zhang X F (2010). Heterotrophic nitrogen removal by a newly isolated Acinetobacter calcoaceticus HNR. Bioresource Technology, 101(14): 5194–5200
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (Grant No.2016YFC0400706), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41671481 and 41977340) and the Science & Technology Plan Project of Guangdong (No. 2016B020240003); Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2019B110205004). We would like to thank Professor Hong YG and Dr. Wu JP (Guangzhou University) for their warmful help on 15N labeling test and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Highlights
• Pseudomonas mendocina was first reported for aerobic nitrate removal.
• It removed 90% of NO3− -N in 24 h under aerobic conditions.
• This strain converted NO3−-N to bio-nitrogen (37.9%) and gaseous nitrogen (49.7%).
• Inoculation of this strain increased sludge denitrification rate by 4.3 times.
Supplementary materials
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Ling, J., Chen, P. et al. Pseudomonas mendocina LYX: A novel aerobic bacterium with advantage of removing nitrate high effectively by assimilation and dissimilation simultaneously. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 15, 57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1349-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1349-3