Skip to main content
Log in

Metro passenger flow control with station-to-station cooperation based on stop-skipping and boarding limiting

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metro passenger flow control problem is studied under given total inbound demand in this work, which considers passenger demand control and train capacity supply. Relevant connotations are analyzed and a mathematical model is developed. The decision variables are boarding limiting and stop-skipping strategies and the objective is the maximal passenger profit. And a passenger original station choice model based on utility theory is built to modify the inbound passenger distribution among stations. Algorithm of metro passenger flow control scheme is designed, where two key technologies of stopping-station choice and headway adjustment are given and boarding limiting and train stopping-station scheme are optimized. Finally, a real case of Beijing metro is taken for example to verify validity. The results show that in the three scenarios with different ratios of normal trains to stop-skipping trains, the total limited passenger volume is the smallest and the systematic profit is the largest in scenario 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HE Ying-song. Analysis and research on passenger volume control in rail transit stations [D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2013. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. STUBENSCHROTT M, KOGLER C, MATYUS T, SEER S. A dynamic pedestrian route choice model validated in a high density metro station [J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2014, 2: 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. XU Xin-yue. Calculation of station service capacity and assessment of capacity adaptability in urban rail transit [D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. HAYWOOD L, KONING M. The distribution of crowding costs in public transport: New evidence from Paris [J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2015, 77: 182–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. SUN A, HICKMAN M. The real-time stop-skipping problem [J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005, 9(2): 91–109.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. JIANG C S, DENG Y F, HU C, DING H, CHOW W K. Crowding in platform staircases of a metro station in China during rush hours [J]. Safety Science, 2009, 47: 931–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. FELIPE D, JUAN C M, RICARDO G. How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2012, 46(9): 1202–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. CORTES C E, SAEZ D, MILLA F, NUNEZ A, RIQUELME M. Hybrid predictive control for real-time optimization of public transport system’s operations based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization [J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2010, 18(5): 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CORTES C E, SAEZ D, ALEJANDRO T. Integrating short turning and deadheading in the optimization of transit services [J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2011, 45(6): 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MANELY E J, ORR S W, CHENG T. A heuristic model of bounded route choice in urban areas [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 56: 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. HOOGENDOOM P S, WAGENINGEN-KESSELS V F. Continuum theory for pedestrian traffic flow: Local route choice modelling and its implications [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 59: 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MAI T, FOSGERAU M, FREJINGER E. A nested recursive logit model for route choice analysis. Transportation [J]. Research Part B: Methodological, 2015, 75: 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. YUKI H, TAKASHI N. Asymmetric effect of route-length difference and bottleneck on route choice in two-route traffic system [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2015, 428: 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. GENTILE G, SANG N, PALLOTTINO S. Route choice on transit networks with online information at stops [J]. Transportation Science, 2005, 39(3): 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MA Jiang-shan, FUKUDA D. A hyperpath-based network generalized extreme-value model for route choice under uncertainties [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 59: 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ZHANG Jun-lin, YANG Hai. Modeling route choice inertia in network equilibrium with heterogeneous prevailing choice sets [J]. Transportation Research Part C, 2015, 57: 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. BELLEI G, GENTILE G, MESCHINI L, PAPOLA N. A demand model with departure time choice for within-day dynamic traffic assignment [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175: 1557–1576.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. BELLEI G, GENTILE G, PAPOLA N. A within-day dynamic traffic assignment model for urban road networks [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2005, 39: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. GENTILE G, MESCHINI L, PAPOLA N. Macroscopic arc performance models with capacity constraints for within-day dynamic traffic assignment [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2005, 39: 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. LEIVA C, MUNOZ J C, GIESEN R, LARRAIN H. Design of limited-stop services for an urban bus corridor with capacity constraints [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2010, 44(10): 1186–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. XU Xin-yue, LIU Jun, LI Hai-ying, ZHOU Yan-fang. An analytical method to calculate station evacuation capacity [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science & Technology of Mining and Metallurgy, 2014, 21(10): 4043–4050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. PALMA D A, KILANI M, PROOST S. Discomfort in mass transit and its implication for scheduling and pricing [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2015, 71: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. GENTILE G, MESCHINI L, PAPOLA N. Spillback congestion in dynamic traffic assignment: A macroscopic flow model with time-varying bottlenecks [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2007, 41: 1114–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. TROZZI V, GENTILE G, BELL G H M, KAPARIAS L. Dynamic user equilibrium in public transport networks with passenger congestion and hyperpaths [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2013, 57: 266–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-ying Li  (李海鹰).

Additional information

Foundation item: Projects(RCS2015ZZ002, RCS2014ZT25) supported by State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control & Safety, China; Project(2015RC058) supported by Beijing Jiaotong University, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, M., Li, Hy., Xu, Xy. et al. Metro passenger flow control with station-to-station cooperation based on stop-skipping and boarding limiting. J. Cent. South Univ. 24, 236–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3424-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3424-x

Key words

Navigation