Skip to main content
Log in

Peripheral challenge in container port system: A case study of Pearl River Delta

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth of peripheral ports to dominant hubs has been well documented in North America and Europe, and has led to the elaboration of several theoretical models. However, although changes in containerization growth have been taking place in the South and East Asia in recent years, particularly in China, only a few studies have focused on this region. The Pearl (Zhujiang) River Delta (PRD) has a typical port system with hub and peripheral ports, and provides an excellent case for studying the Peripheral Challenge. This paper introduces the theoretical evidence of the Hayuth model and analyzes the evolution of the container port system in the PRD with five phases: 1) phase I: preconditions for change and phase II: initial container port development in the 1970s and early 1980s; 2) phase III: diffusion, consolidation, and port concentration in the middle and late 1980s; 3) phase IV: the load center in the 1990s; and (4) phase V: the Peripheral Challenge since the late 1990s. The results illustrate that the Shenzhen port presents mounting challenges to the Hong Kong port, descending from a transshipment hub of China to a regional load center of Southeast China. Furthermore, this paper explores five points that have led to the evolution of the port system in the PRD: 1) competition in the regional port systems; 2) different interested parties; 3) shift of investment strategies of international terminal operators; 4) integration of shipping networks and reorganization of carriers; and 5) cost-based competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airriess C A, 1989. The spatial spread of container transport in a developing regional economy. Transportation Research, (23): 453–461.

  • Baird A J, 1997. Rejoinder: Extending the lifecycle of container main ports in upstream urban locations. Maritime Policy & Management, 24(2): 299–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Youhui, 1999. On the evolution model of container port system: A case study of the lower Changjiang River container port system. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 19(6): 485–490. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Youhui, Cao Weidong, 2003. Formation and evolution mechanism of coastal container ports system in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 58(3): 424–432. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao Youhui, Li Haijian, Chen Wen, 2004. The spatial structure and the competition pattern of the container port system of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 59(6): 1020–1027. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Development and Labour Bureau, 2004. Study on Hong Kong Port-Master Plan 2020. Hong Kong: Economic Development and Labour Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial Board of China Transportation & Communication, 1971–2007. China Transportation & Communications Year Book 1970–2007. Beijing: House of China Transportation & Communications Year Book. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman S, 1982. The Competitive Dynamics of Container Shipping. Aldershot, UK: Cower Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggett P, 1966. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. London: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayuth Y, 1981. Containerization and load center concept. Economic Geography, 57(2): 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayuth Y, 1988. Rationalization and deconcentration of the U.S. container port system. The Professional Geographer, 40(3): 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James J W, 2000. The evolution of a regional container port system. Journal of Transport Geography, (8): 263–275. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00013-2

  • Kuby M, Reid N, 1992. Technological change and the concentration of the U.S general cargo port system: 1970–1988. Economic Geography, 68(3): 272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H M, 1978. Current trend in Great Lakes shipping. Geo-Journal, (2): 117–122.

  • Notteboom T E, 1997. Concentration and load centre development in the European container port system. Journal of Transport Geography, 5(2): 99–115. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00072-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack B, 1990. Intermodal transportation in North America and the development of inland load centers. The Professional Geographer, 42(1): 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr J T, 1994. The mid-Atlantic load center. Maritime Policy and Management, 21(3): 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taaffe E, Morril R, 1963. Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries. Geographical Review, 53(4): 503–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Chengjin, 2008. Research prospect and progress of modern port geography. Advances in Earth Science, 23(3): 243–251. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Liehui, 2007. A review of the western research on port system. Economic Geography, 27(2): 291–295. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Lijun, Hou Chaohui, Hu Guoqiang et al., 2005. Modern Port Logistics. Beijing: China Economic Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiao’e Wang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41171108), Knowledge Innovation Programs of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZCXZ-YW-Q10-4-1), Project of National Science and Technology Infrastructure Program (No. 2008BAH31B05)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C., Wang, J. & Ducruet, C. Peripheral challenge in container port system: A case study of Pearl River Delta. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 22, 97–108 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0517-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0517-1

Keywords

Navigation