Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with cancer survivors’ selection between two group physical activity programs

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Physical activity programs have health benefits for cancer survivors, but little is known about factors that influence cancer survivors’ actual choices between different physical activity programs. To address this knowledge gap, we examined factors associated with selecting between two group physical activity programs.

Methods

The present study is nested in a non-randomized trial. After attending an orientation to learn about the programs offered, cancer survivors (n = 133) selected between a dragon boat paddling team and group walking program. We measured the association between physical activity program chosen and demographic, clinical, physical and psychosocial characteristics.

Results

Roughly equal proportions chose to participate in dragon boat paddling or walking (55% versus 45%). Of the many variables studied, few were associated with program selection. Compared to those who chose the walking program, those who chose the dragon boat paddling team were more likely to be Caucasians (p = .015) and younger (p = .027), and marginally signifantly more like to have cancers other than breast cancer (p = .056) and have greater lower-body strength (.062).

Discussions/Conclusions

Among a cohort of cancer survivors who were interested in physical activity programs who chose between two markedly different group physical activity programs, the two programs attracted groups of approximately the same size and with remarkably similar characteristics overall. The two most notable associations were that Caucasians and younger adults were significantly more likely to choose the dragon boat paddling program.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

To meet the needs of cancer survivors, a menu of physical activity program options may be optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Courneya KS. Exercise interventions during cancer treatment: biopsychosocial outcomes. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001;29:60–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinto BM, Maruyama NC, Engebretson TO, Thebarge RW. Exercise participation, mood and coping in early-stage breast cancer survivors. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1998;16:45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Segar ML, Katch VL, Roth RS, Garcia AW, Portner TI, Glickman SG, et al. The effect of aerobic exercise on self-esteem and depressive and anxiety symptoms among breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998;25:107–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimeo FC, Stieglitz RD, Novelli-Fischer U, Fetscher S, Keul J. Effects of physical activity on the fatigue and psychologic status of cancer patients during chemotherapy. Cancer. 1999;85:2273–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Porock D, Kristjanson LJ, Tinnelly K, Duke T, Blight J. An exercise intervention for advanced cancer patients experiencing fatigue: a pilot study. J Palliat Care. 2000;16:30–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz AL. Daily fatigue patterns and effect of exercise in women with breast cancer. Cancer Pract. 2000;8:16–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheema BS, Gaul CA. Full-body exercise training improves fitness and quality of life in survivors of breast cancer. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20:14–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwartz AL, Mori M, Gao R, Nail LM, King ME. Exercise reduces daily fatigue in women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;33:718–23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Courneya KS, Mackey JR, Bell GJ, Jones LW, Field CJ, Fairey AS. Randomized controlled trial of exercise training in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors: cardiopulmonary and quality of life outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1660–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, Quinney HA, Fields AL, Jones LW, Fairey AS. A randomized trial of exercise and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2003;12:347–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL, Holmes MD, Chan AT, Chan JA, Colditz GA, et al. Physical activity and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holick CN, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, Titus-Ernstoff L, Bersch AJ, Stampfer MJ, et al. Physical activity and survival after diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:379–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones LW, Courneya KS. Exercise counseling and programming preferences of cancer survivors. Cancer Pract. 2002;10:208–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karvinen KH, Courneya KS, Campbell KL, Pearcey RG, Dundas G, Capstick V, et al. Exercise preferences of endometrial cancer survivors: a population-based study. Cancer Nurs. 2006;29:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stevinson C, Capstick V, Schepansky A, Tonkin K, Vallance JK, Ladha AB, et al. Physical activity preferences of ovarian cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2009;18:422–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karvinen KH, Courneya KS, Venner P, North S. Exercise programming and counseling preferences in bladder cancer survivors: a population-based study. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Jones LW, Reiman T. Exercise preferences among a population-based sample of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006;15:34–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers LQ, Markwell SJ, Verhulst S, McAuley E, Courneya KS. Rural breast cancer survivors: exercise preferences and their determinants. Psychooncology. 2009;18:412–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones LW, Guill B, Keir ST, Carter K, Friedman HS, Bigner DD, et al. Exercise interest and preferences among patients diagnosed with primary brain cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rogers LQ, Malone J, Rao K, Courneya KS, Fogleman A, Tippey A, et al. Exercise preferences among patients with head and neck cancer: prevalence and associations with quality of life, symptom severity, depression, and rural residence. Head Neck. 2009;31:994–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Shah P, Dunnington G, Hopkins-Price P. Exercise stage of change, barriers, expectations, values and preferences among breast cancer patients during treatment: a pilot study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007;16:55–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McKenzie DC. Abreast in a boat–a race against breast cancer. Cmaj. 1998;159:376–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell TL, Yakiwchuk CV, Griffin KL, Gray RE, Fitch MI. Survivor dragon boating: a vehicle to reclaim and enhance life after treatment for breast cancer. Health Care Women Int. 2007;28:122–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Unruh AM, Elvin N. In the eye of the dragon: women’s experience of breast cancer and the occupation of dragon boat racing. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:138–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Culos-Reed SN, Shields C, Brawley LR. Breast cancer survivors involved in vigorous team physical activity: psychosocial correlates of maintenance participation. Psychooncology. 2005;14:594–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lane K, Jespersen D, McKenzie DC. The effect of a whole body exercise programme and dragon boat training on arm volume and arm circumference in women treated for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2005;14:353–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. ACSM’s Health-Related Physical Fitness Assessment Manual (Paperback), 2nd ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

  28. Noonan V, Dean E. Submaximal exercise testing: clinical application and interpretation. Phys Ther. 2000;80:782–807.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ware JEJ, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2000.

  30. Ware JEJ, Kosinski M. SF-36 physical & mental health summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. 2nd ed. Lincoln: Quality Metric Incorporated; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fairclough DL, Cella DF. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G): non-response to individual questions. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:321–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Piper B, Lindsey A, Dodd M, Ferketich S, Paul S, Weller S. The development of an instrument to measure the subjective dimension of fatigue. In: Funk S, Tornquist E, Champagne M, Wiese R, editors. Key aspects of comfort: management of pain, fatigue, and nausea. New York: Springer; 1989. p. 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Antoni MH, Lehman JM, Kilbourn KM, Boyers AE, Culver JL, Alferi SM, et al. Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2001;20:20–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tomich PL, Helgeson VS. Is finding something good in the bad always good? Benefit finding among women with breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2004;23:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Delaney C. The Spirituality Scale: development and psychometric testing of a holistic instrument to assess the human spiritual dimension. J Holist Nurs. 2005;23:145–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilcox S, King AC, Brassington GS, Ahn DK. Physical activity preferences of middle-aged and older adults: a community analysis. J Aging Phys Activ. 1997;5:50–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Myers AM, Weigel C, Holliday PJ. Sex- and age-linked determinants of physical activity in adulthood. Can J Public Health. 1989;80:256–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Federation USDB; 2010.

  40. Courneya KS, Mackey JR, Fairey AS. Managing the side effects of cancer and its treatments with exercise. Am J Med Sports. 2003;5:132–6.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Irwin ML, Ainsworth BE. Physical activity interventions following cancer diagnosis: methodological challenges to delivery and assessment. Cancer Investig. 2004;22:30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Galvao DA, Newton RU. Review of exercise intervention studies in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:899–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Courneya KS, McKenzie DC, Mackey JR, Gelmon K, Reid RD, Friedenreich CM, et al. Moderators of the effects of exercise training in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2008;112:1845–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thompson CE, Wankel LM. The effects of perceived activity choice upon frequency of exercise behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1980;10:436–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy L. Carter.

Additional information

Funding Source

Support for this project provided by the National Cancer Institute #1R03CA128482 (PI Dr. Carter).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carter, C.L., Onicescu, G., Cartmell, K.B. et al. Factors associated with cancer survivors’ selection between two group physical activity programs. J Cancer Surviv 4, 388–398 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0142-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0142-x

Keywords

Navigation